Assessing the Global Operating Environment
Assessing the Global Operating Environment
Examining the environments in which the force operates.Download Index/Download Assessment
Measuring the “strength” of a military force—the extent to which that force can accomplish missions—requires examination of the environments in which the force operates.
You Might Also Like
About Assessing the Global Operating Environment
Aspects of one environment may facilitate military operations, but aspects of another may work against them. A favorable operating environment presents the U.S. military with obvious advantages; an unfavorable operating environment may limit the effect of U.S. military power. The capabilities and assets of U.S. allies, the strength of foes, the geopolitical environment of the region, and the availability of forward facilities and logistics infrastructure all factor into whether an operating environment is one that can support U.S. military operations.
When assessing an operating environment, one must pay particular attention to any treaty obligations the United States has with countries in the region. A treaty defense obligation ensures that the legal framework is in place for the U.S. to maintain and operate a military presence in a particular country. In addition, a treaty partner usually yields regular training exercises and interoperability as well as political and economic ties.
Additional factors—including the military capabilities of allies that might be useful to U.S. military operations; the degree to which the U.S. and allied militaries in the region are interoperable (e.g., can use common means of command, communication, and other systems); and whether the U.S. maintains key bilateral alliances with nations in the region—also affect the operating environment. Likewise, nations where the U.S. has already stationed assets or permanent bases and countries from which the U.S. has launched military operations in the past may provide needed support to future U.S. military operations. The relationships and knowledge gained through any of these factors would undoubtedly ease future U.S. military operations in a region and contribute greatly to a positive operating environment.
In addition to U.S. defense relations within a region, additional criteria—including the quality of the local infrastructure, the political stability of the area, whether or not a country is embroiled in any conflicts, and the degree to which a nation is economically free—should also be considered.
Each of these factors contributes to the judgment as to whether a particular operating environment is favorable or unfavorable to future U.S. military operations. The operating environment assessment is meant to add critical context to complement the threat environment assessment and U.S. military assessment detailed in subsequent sections of the Index.
This Index will refer to all disputed territories by the name employed by the United States Department of State and should not be seen as reflecting a position on any of these disputes.
Assessing Threats to U.S. Vital Interests
The Index focuses on three fundamental vital national interests.
An Assessment of U.S. Military Power
America must defend itself while deterring enemies and opportunists.
Glossary of Terms and AbbreviationsLearn More
A guide to understanding the terms and abbreviations used throughout the 2018 Index.
The assessment portion of the Index of U.S. Military Strength is composed of three major sections that address America’s military power, the operating environments within or through which it must operate, and threats to U.S. vital national interests.
This Index measures the capability of the U.S. military based on the current state of its combat equipment. Four factors are key to this assessment. This appendix presents each of the services’ principal combat platforms and corresponding modernization programs, scoring them in each of the four factors.
The Honorable J. William MiddendorfRead More
His decision-making, relationship-building, and statesmanship on the international stage have enhanced America’s security and stability during a volatile period in our history.
View the graphics used throughout the 2018 Index.
The 2017 IndexSee the 2017 Index
Unfortunately, our work for the 2017 Index reveals that the trends identified in our 2015 and 2016 editions continue in a negative direction.