Chinese Leadership Corrupts Another U.N. Organization

COMMENTARY Global Politics

Chinese Leadership Corrupts Another U.N. Organization

May 11th, 2020 4 min read

Commentary By

Brett D. Schaefer

Senior Research Fellow, International Regulatory Affairs

Dean Cheng

Senior Research Fellow, Asian Studies Center

Klon Kitchen

Director, Center for Technology Policy

Zhao’s attitude ignores legitimate security concerns about Huawei.  IMAGEMORE Co.,Ltd./Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Chinese influence in the United Nations and its affiliated international organizations has been expanding significantly over the past decade. 

Zhao has championed Beijing’s priorities in violation of his obligation to be a neutral international civil servant.

The member states of the International Telecommunication Union should remind Zhao that he reports to them, not to Beijing.

Chinese influence in the United Nations and its affiliated international organizations has been expanding significantly over the past decade. 

China watchers long have hoped that the communist nation’s integration into the international system would “normalize” China. They hoped China would come to appreciate the value of observing international rules and norms and become freer economically and politically. 

However, it is now clear that the reverse actually has happened and that China is influencing those organizations far more than they are moderating China. 

The most glaring example is the obsequious treatment China received from the World Health Organization despite its lack of transparency and cooperation on COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus. However, that is hardly the only example.  

Another is the International Telecommunication Union, which has been led by China’s Houlin Zhao as secretary-general since 2015 following his election at the organization’s plenipotentiary conference. Founded in 1865 as the International Telegraph Union, the global entity is responsible for issues related to information and communication technologies. 

Even before he became secretary-general of the union, Zhao had sought to insulate China from agreed practices on internet governance. He actively attempted to undermine the role of ICANN (the Internet Corporation for the Assignment of Names and Numbers), the private, nonprofit entity responsible for coordinating key processes and procedures necessary for the internet to operate smoothly and doing so through a governance structure with multiple stakeholders. 

Zhao, who was born in China, pressed Chinese companies and internet service providers to go solely through Beijing’s National Internet Registry rather than the Asia-Pacific Network Information Center, which ICANN processes entail. 

When Zhao was head of the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau of the International Telecommunication Union, he fought for Chinese national authorities to be allowed to grant new addresses directly.   

Since becoming secretary-general of the International Telecommunication Union, Zhao has championed Beijing’s priorities in violation of his obligation to be a neutral international civil servant. For example, under his leadership: 

—Earlier this year, the Financial Times noted how the International Telecommunication Union has provided a forum for Chinese proposals for a “radical change to the way the internet works … which critics say will also bake authoritarianism into the architecture underpinning the web.”   

—In 2019, Zhao vowed to join hands with China on its Belt and Road Initiative, saying: “It’s the grand guide and platform for China’s foreign aid plans. It’s an express train that once you get on, you can join forces with China and develop along with the country.”  

—In 2017, Zhao again championed China’s key investment effort, saying: “China’s One Belt, One Road can improve lives at scale through ICT [information and communications technology] investment.”  

Most recently, Zhao has dismissed U.S. security concerns about the involvement of the Chinese telecom company Huawei in developing 5G mobile networks as a “loser’s attitude.” 

“Those preoccupations with Huawei’s equipment, up to now there is no proof so far,” Zhao said. “I would encourage Huawei to be given equal opportunities to bid for business, and during the operational process, if you find anything wrong, then you can charge them and accuse them. But if we don’t have anything then to put them on the blacklist–I think this is not fair.”

Zhao’s attitude ignores legitimate security concerns about Huawei. 

As a Chinese company, Huawei is subject to China’s national security and cybersecurity laws, which mandate government access to all information that transits, is stored on, or in any other way touches that nation’s networks–even if the information is collected outside China. 

Moreover, because of China’s focus on integrating civilian and military industrial sectors, its products are more likely to be exploited by the People’s Liberation Army. This only exacerbates a proven history of low cybersecurity standards, stealing intellectual property and data, and deliberately circumventing international sanctions on rogue nations such as Iran.

Upon appointment, International Telecommunication Union officials, including the secretary-general, take an oath of office. Zhao was sworn in with the following pledge:

I solemnly swear to exercise in all loyalty, discretion and conscience the functions entrusted to me as a staff member of the International Telecommunication Union; to discharge these functions and to regulate my conduct with the interest of the Union only in view, without seeking or accepting instructions or assistance from any Government or other authority external to the Union in regard to the accomplishment of my duties.

It is extraordinary for an international civil servant to shill blatantly for a company from his home country the way Zhao is doing for Huawei, or to so boldly endorse initiatives of his home country the way Zhao has championed China’s Belt and Road Initiative. It is even rarer when those statements involve official responsibilities. 

The member states of the International Telecommunication Union should remind Zhao that he reports to them, not to Beijing.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal