The EU’s New Investment Deal With China Is a Blow to the Transatlantic Alliance

COMMENTARY Europe

The EU’s New Investment Deal With China Is a Blow to the Transatlantic Alliance

Jan 13th, 2021 2 min read

Commentary By

Walter Lohman @WalterLohman

Director, Asian Studies Center

Nile Gardiner, Ph.D. @NileGardiner

Director, Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom and Bernard and Barbara Lomas Fellow

European Council President Charles Michel attends a video conference to approve an investment pact between China and the European Union on December 30, 2020 in Brussels, Belgium. Anadolu Agency / Contributor / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

Instead of forging a common course of action on the China challenge, Brussels used it as leverage to secure short-term commercial advantage.

The EU is already a significant investor in China. Europeans have invested as much as $181 billion in China, with Germany being the largest investor.

The deal is a political win for China at a time when its diplomatic relationships around the world are worsening.

The European Union and the People’s Republic of China reached a comprehensive agreement on investment Dec. 30, and it has already elicited a storm of disapproval from advocates of transatlantic cooperation in both the U.S. and Europe.

For good reason. Instead of forging a common course of action on the China challenge, Brussels used it as leverage to secure short-term commercial advantage. The Chinese, of course, were more than willing to accommodate.

The European Union and China had been looking to complete a bilateral investment agreement before the end of 2020. Beijing’s sudden flexibility on the terms of the agreement were clearly part of an effort to preempt more robust transatlantic cooperation in confronting China.

Essentially, the deal gives investors greater, more secure access to one another’s markets.

The EU is already a significant investor in China. Europeans have invested as much as $181 billion in China, with Germany being the largest investor.

The deal is a political win for China at a time when its diplomatic relationships around the world are worsening. Beijing has become increasingly belligerent toward countries that want to shine a light on Chinese human rights abuses, such as the use of forced labor, or who want to investigate the origins of COVID-19.

It also hands Beijing a major strategic boost after suffering a series of setbacks in Europe, with several governments reconsidering their earlier willingness to allow Huawei to develop their 5G networks.

The U.S. and its European allies share a set of values, and vast array of interests. This is indisputable. They understand each other to a degree that only people born of the same political culture can.

The U.S. and European countries have contemporary habits of cooperation—as exemplified by NATO, for instance—deeper than the U.S. has ever had anywhere else in the world. It is in the interest of both sides of the Atlantic to bring these assets to bear in their strategic competition with China.

Reaching transatlantic consensus on China will be challenging. It will require the U.S. to utilize relationships throughout the capitals of EU member states, in Strasbourg, and in Brussels itself to convince continental Europe of the value of cooperation. 

The United States has many friends in Europe who see the China challenge the same way they do. And its diplomats know their way around European capitals better than the Chinese. 

Washington has been spearheading international efforts to shed light on China’s belligerence and abusive trade practices on several fronts. Sadly, the recent comprehensive agreement on investment clouds efforts to make common cause with Europe in areas of shared interest.

It is time for our European allies to stand with the United States in advancing a robust transatlantic approach toward China—one that holds Beijing to account for its anti-market trade practices, its dismal track record on human rights, its destruction of freedom in Hong Kong, its increasingly aggressive approach toward the free world, and its refusal to operate in a transparent manner over the outbreak of COVID-19.

This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal