July 11, 2019 Supreme Court Review of the 2018-2019 Term
The Supreme Court’s 2018-2019 term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right?
Panel I (11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.)
Shay Dvoretzky, Jones Day
Andy Pincus, Mayer Brown
Kannon Shanmugam, Paul Weiss
John Malcolm, The Heritage Foundation (Moderator)
Panel II (12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.)
Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal
Adam Liptak, The New York Times
Richard Wolf, USA Today
Elizabeth Slattery, The Heritage Foundation (Moderator)
The Supreme Court’s 2018-2019 term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right? What will the Court’s ruling in The American Legion v. American Humanist Association mean for the future of religion in the public square? How will Rucho v. Common Cause and Benisek v. Lamone, the partisan gerrymandering cases, impact the next election cycle? Will the ruling in Kisor v. Wilkie rein in administrative agencies? How have Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh changed the balance of the Court, and have any broader themes of the Roberts Court emerged this term?
Please join us as our distinguished panels of practitioners and journalists discuss these cases and more from the 2018-2019 term.
COMMENTARY3 min read
COMMENTARY4 min read
COMMENTARY1 min read