July 28, 2007
By Michael Franc
During the heady days of 1993 when former First Lady Hillary
Clinton assembled a group of health experts to reconfigure our
health-care system, liberal strategists realized that the march
toward socialized medicine might be a slow and halting one. Thus,
they devised several alternate routes to the promised land of a
universal, government-run system. Intriguingly, one of these
fall-back scenarios bears an uncanny resemblance to the dramatic
expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
now under consideration on Capitol Hill.
One option set forth by Clinton's health task force was dubbed
"Kids First." "Under this approach," the task force authors
explained, "health care reform is phased in by population [group],"
beginning with "the most vulnerable of our citizens -- children."
Kids First, they admitted, "is really a precursor to the new
[universal] system" under which states would receive "broad
flexibility in its design so that it can be easily folded into . .
. future program structures."
Those "future program structures" included plans to eventually
add other "population groups" to the government's rolls.
Enacted four years after HillaryCare expired, SCHIP began as a
modest program to expand coverage to children in families with
incomes up to twice the poverty level ($40,000 for a family of four
today). But one decade and some $40 billion later, profligate
states have exploited loopholes and transformed SCHIP into a far
more expansive program, one that now covers children in families
with annual incomes as high as $82,000, their parents, and even
some childless adults.
Following the script outlined in the task force memo, liberals
lawmakers now want to expand SCHIP to "new populations" by
increasing eligibility for this welfare-style benefit to children
(including "slackers" up to age 24) in households with incomes as
high as 400% of the federal poverty level. In the Senate version,
SCHIP's annual funding level would triple by 2012 to approximately
$15 billion. (Liberals also pander to illegal immigrants with a
provision that would eliminate the requirement that persons
applying for Medicaid or SCHIP services show proof of
The appeal of using children for political gain is undeniable.
"You can't," Republican pollster Whit Ayres says, "construct a
[poll] question on children and health without getting an
overwhelming majority in favor of giving health insurance to
children." Voting against more health care for kids, he notes, is
Nevertheless, the liberal road map would steer us straight into
a ditch. Offering children from middle-income households a
welfare-style health insurance benefit causes what economists call
a "crowding out" effect -- i.e., expanding public health-insurance
programs actually reduces the overall level of private coverage.
Not only does this dramatically increase the cost per each new
child covered, but it needlessly undermines private coverage.
MIT economist Jonathan Gruber examined recent expansions of
government insurance programs for children and found that "a
natural reaction for workers may be to drop coverage of eligible
dependents only, while maintaining coverage for themselves."
Indeed, under the proposed expansion, SCHIP coverage would be
available to income groups where 89% or more of children are
already enrolled in private health plans. The Congressional Budget
Office found that the Senate's SCHIP bill would move more than 2
million children with private coverage to the government's
Of course, if the conservative alternative is simply a little
less socialism (the counteroffer from Senate Republican leaders is
hardly inspiring: bar adults from SCHIP and limit coverage to
children in families below 200% of poverty), the march toward
HillaryCare will continue.
Thankfully, a hardy band of conservative senators have an
alternative. Spearheaded by Sens. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Tom
Coburn (R-Okla.), they propose overhauling the way we finance
health care. They would jettison the current entitlement-style tax
provision, which subsidizes even the most outrageously expansive
health plans, and replace it with a universal health-care tax
credit, capped at $2,000 for individuals and $5,000 for families.
They also want states to dismantle regulatory obstacles and create
competitive marketplaces where individuals could buy the health
insurance plan that best suits their needs, thereby lowering the
cost of coverage.
According to the Joint Tax Committee, this ambitious approach
not only is budget neutral, but it would deliver private coverage
to 24 million currently uninsured Americans -- six times the level
achieved in the latest installment of HillaryCare.
Kudos to DeMint and his allies. Conservative lawmakers can't
beat something with nothing, especially when it's socialism
hitching a ride on the backs of our children.
Franc, who has held a number of positions on Capitol
Hill, is vice president of Government Relations at The Heritage
First appeared in Human Events
During the heady days of 1993 when former First Lady Hillary Clinton assembled a group of health experts to reconfigure our health-care system, liberal strategists realized that the march toward socialized medicine might be a slow and halting one. Thus, they devised several alternate routes to the promised land of a universal, government-run system. Intriguingly, one of these fall-back scenarios bears an uncanny resemblance to the dramatic expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) now under consideration on Capitol Hill.
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam(R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973