Is Mere Allegiance to a Business Association's Rules Enough to Plead a Sherman Act Conspiracy?

COMMENTARY Courts

Is Mere Allegiance to a Business Association's Rules Enough to Plead a Sherman Act Conspiracy?

Aug 2nd, 2016 1 min read
COMMENTARY BY
Alden Abbott

Deputy Director of Edwin Meese III Centerfor Legal and Judicial Studies

Alden Abbott serves as Deputy Director of Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

On June 28, 2016, in Visa Inc. v. Osborn, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a 2015 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that held that members of a business association could potentially be subject to antitrust liability under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (Section 1), merely based on their participation in the governance of the association and their agreements to adhere to its rules. The Court’s decision will resolve a circuit split between the D.C. Circuit and the Third, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits, all three of which have held that such an allegation by itself would be insufficient to plead a Section 1 conspiracy. The Supreme Court’s decision hopefully will eliminate a substantial source of uncertainty regarding the ability of thousands of associations to adopt efficient generally applicable membership rules, free from the threat of costly antitrust liability.

View the full report here.

This piece was published by Competition Policy International.

More on This Issue