The DHS Budget for FY 2008: Time for a Comprehensive Approach to Homeland Security

Report Homeland Security

The DHS Budget for FY 2008: Time for a Comprehensive Approach to Homeland Security

March 8, 2007 15 min read Download Report
Mackenzie Eaglen
Mackenzie Eaglen
Senior Research Fellow

Mackenzie Eaglen specializes in defense strategy, military readiness and the defense budget.

In the years since the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was established, the Bush Administra­tion has demonstrated its commitment to homeland security by proposing reasonable budgets. The Administration's proposed DHS budget of $46.4 bil­lion for fiscal year (FY) 2008 continues this tradition by requesting an 8 percent increase over the FY 2007 budget.[1] This increase is necessary to implement many programs that began after the department was established and that are now maturing and moving from development to implementation.[2]

Over the short and long term, modest growth in homeland security spending remains appropriate. This year's proposed budget is aptly aligned to effec­tively achieve the strategic priorities that will make all Americans safer.

While the overall homeland security budget request is sound, however, Congress needs to bolster and improve some areas. The U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Citi­zenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and Cus­toms and Border Patrol (CBP) may require additional funding to become fully capable partners in imple­menting stronger immigration, border control, and maritime security programs. These three agencies are essential components in achieving a multilayered homeland security policy.

Congress should support the Administration's FY 2008 homeland security budget request without ear­marking the legislation. In addition, Congress should pass both homeland security authorization and appro­priations bills. Broad homeland security policy issues would be better addressed in an authorization bill than by a patchwork of legislation. A single autho­rization bill would allow the authorizing commit­tees to exercise more stringent oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, to address the many homeland security issues that individual pieces of legislation have not covered, and to avoid reactive stand-alone legislation that is inevitably proposed after the latest threat or incident and directed at ever-changing security concerns.[3]

Homeland Security: A Shared Responsibility

Piecemeal security through individual initiatives, such as searching all U.S.-bound shipping contain­ers, is not as effective as a comprehensive approach to homeland security. The layered defense concept introduced in the national homeland security strat­egy seeks to avoid penetration at multiple points of entry. Additional security initiatives seek to reduce vulnerabilities further by making critical targets less susceptible to attack.

Effectively improving security requires a holistic approach to distributing resources to ensure that each layer of the system is capable of fulfilling its mission and that individual or agency efforts are complementary instead of redundant. Selecting the proper tools for each layer should be based upon rational cost-benefit analysis while sustaining an acceptable level of risk.

A comprehensive homeland security strategy requires an equally comprehensive effort from all levels of government, the private sector, individual communities, and private citizens. Along with first responders, state and local governments will typi­cally be the first to react within their own commu­nities in the event of a disaster or catastrophe. Private-sector participation in homeland security is also essential because the private sector has signifi­cant responsibilities in protecting individual assets and critical infrastructure from potential threats.

The Council for Excellence in Government recently produced the Public Readiness Index, a survey-based tool that measures the emergency pre­paredness of individuals, families, and communi­ties. The national survey found that 32 percent of Americans have done nothing to prepare for an emergency.[4] Homeland security funds and invest­ment must go above and beyond federal dollars to maintain a continued commitment to individual preparedness.

Better Security Through Smart Spending

The Administration's budget proposal addresses many significant needs within the Department of Homeland Security.

Border and Immigration Security Initiatives. To achieve operational control of the U.S. southern border, DHS should focus on building up the means to limit illegal crossings between the land points of entry, interdict smuggling by air and sea, discourage unlawful presence inside the country, and provide adequate legal alternatives to support south-north migration flows. This strategy could be accom­plished with a mixture of federal, state, local, and contractor-provided capabilities.[5]

SBInet is the DHS's technological component of the Secure Border Initiative charged with develop­ing and installing the technology and infrastructure for control of the border. The FY 2008 budget pro­poses spending $1 billion to implement SBInet, beginning with the southwest land border. This program and new infrastructure will provide the backbone for border security and is a significant improvement over previous programs such as the Integrated Surveillance Intelligence System and America's Shield Initiative.

Along with technology and infrastructure, the proposed $10.7 million for Border Enforcement Security Task Forces is critical to prioritizing border security threats. The funding is intended primarily to establish six new task forces.[6] These agents would coordinate a unified response to potential border threats across all layers of government and law enforcement to disrupt criminal organizations.

State and local law enforcement are essential partners in federal border security efforts. As part of a broader effort to decentralize homeland security, the FY 2008 budget request includes $26.4 million for training state and local law enforcement officers in federal immigration enforcement and equipping the participating local agencies with the appropriate technology, such as access to IDENT (the Auto­mated Biometric Identification System).[7]

In addition, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services needs to modernize its business infrastruc­ture. The FY 2008 budget would fund this $139 million effort primarily through premium process­ing fees instead of by simply spending additional taxpayer dollars.[8] These revenues would fund broader investments in important new technologies and business processes designed to improve the agency's customer service and capabilities.

Internal enforcement is another necessary com­ponent of a multilayered defense, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement's ICE Mutual Agreement Between Government and Employers (IMAGE) receiving $5 million in the current budget request. IMAGE will allow the agency to collaborate more effectively with the private sector in worksite enforcement to reduce the number of undocu­mented workers in the United States.

Transportation and Infrastructure Security.Protecting major modes of transportation and America's critical infrastructure remains a broad and daunting task. The federal government needs to enhance its own capacity to increase situational awareness of homeland security activities and to shift resources where and when they are needed most. The Administration is correct in requesting $37.6 million for the Transportation Security Administration's Secure Flight Program in FY 2008. This funding would support merging Secure Flight with the CBP Advance Passenger Information Sys­tem and would provide additional funds for equip­ment and training to implement the program fully.[9]

Increased ability to share information among fed­eral agencies is the goal of $146.2 million in FY 2008 for the US-VISIT (United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) program. This funding would allow the DHS, Department of State, and Department of Justice (DOJ) to create interoperable systems for biometric identification to reduce the number of false positives and provide stronger match rates. Specifically, this funding would allow sharing of the IDENT system and DOJ's Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System and allow US-VISIT to capture 10 finger­prints rather than just two.[10]

The FY 2008 budget proposal also includes $15 million for establishing an office to oversee chemical site security. This amount should be adequate for this effort to establish security standards and ensure safeguards, including the classification of facilities based on risk.

Plugging the Gaps in the FY 2008 Budget Request

Overall, the Administration's budget request for homeland security is sound, but Congress can and should bolster and improve certain specific areas.

DHS Initiatives. Funding for the DHS policy office in FY 2008 includes $5.1 million to continue the DHS's oversight as a member of the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., implement the REAL ID program, and expand the international affairs staff.[11] Currently, the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Policy provides broad policy guidance, but this responsibility is more appropriate for an under secretary.

When working within and across federal agen­cies, stature matters. An under secretary and the under secretary's office would have more power to consolidate strategies, plans, and procedures across the vast spectrum of departments and entities that make up the DHS.[12] A central and senior Under Secretary for Policy could also more effectively inte­grate DHS activities in support of the Proliferation Security Initiative and other counterterrorism pro­grams. This position would conduct program anal­ysis, perform long-range strategic planning, and undertake net assessments.

Specifically, Congress should:

  • Strengthen policy guidance by elevating the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Policy to the rank of under secretary.

Homeland Security State and Local Grants.The homeland security budget should invest in programs that assist in creating a true national preparedness system as opposed to just supple­menting the needs of state and local governments. The FY 2008 budget request contains a total of $3.2 billion for state and local homeland security grant programs, including assistance to firefighters and support for the Public Safety Interoperability Communications program. Reforming these grant programs to invest more federal funds in counter­terrorism programs that break up terrorist cells and thwart attacks before they occur is important. While Congress and the DHS should continue to aid state and local first responders, these grants should not serve as "pork." Congress needs to ensure that grant funding is limited to programs that are directly involved in homeland security.

Federal grant funding should focus on programs that help state and local governments to integrate their counterterrorism, preparedness, and response efforts into a national system and to expand their capacity to coordinate support, share resources, and exchange and exploit information. Grant funding should contribute to a wider security effort to create emergency communication systems needed to respond to national disasters, to promote effective public-private sharing of the emergency manage­ment electromagnetic spectrum, and to create a national capability to deploy a wide-area emergency management communications network for cata­strophic disasters.[13]

Finally, the current DHS list of critical infrastruc­ture is too expansive and includes sectors that are not truly vital to the federal government's function­ing. The federal government has a vested interest in only the most critical energy, finance, telecommuni­cations, and transportation assets.

Specifically, Congress should:

  • Reduce the number of homeland security grant categories and focus grants on programs that integrate state and local efforts into a national system;
  • Encourage the creation of regional homeland security outreach offices to assist in mobilizing state and local government and public safety officials and to facilitate the sharing of informa­tion and data analysis capabilities; and
  • Limit the list of critical infrastructure, thereby eliminating obstacles to effective information sharing and cooperative action.

Maritime Security.Global commerce is tightly connected to maritime security. The world's oceans serve as highways for global commerce, and national economies and multinational companies rely on continued freedom of the seas. Accordingly, the Administration's FY 2008 budget requests $8.7 billion for the U.S. Coast Guard, including $788 million for the Integrated Deepwater System.

Most of the Coast Guard's major cutters are near­ing the end of their service lives, both mechanically and operationally. A Reliance-class medium-endur­ance cutter built in 1964 is old for any ship, and these 18-knot vessels are not fast enough to catch today's smugglers. The Hamilton-class high-endur­ance cutters are more capable, but these 30-year-old ships are also well past their prime. The fleet of 110-foot Island-class patrol boats is also aging and rap­idly wearing out from sustained usage.

As a result of these operational and maintenance problems, the Coast Guard has embarked on a recapitalization of its deepwater assets. As opposed to coastal units, deepwater assets are those cutters and aircraft that typically operate more than 50 miles from shore and for sustained periods of time. This recapitalization is focused on improving Coast Guard capabilities across all deepwater missions, from fisheries enforcement to migrant interdiction to search and rescue, all while reducing mainte­nance costs and increasing operational readiness.

While the future cutter must be optimized for regular peacetime duties, it must also perform duties with its naval counterparts where applicable and be ready to operate alongside Navy ships in time of war or other contingencies. The Coast Guard intends to build new cutters designed from the beginning around appropriate common Navy systems to ensure interoperability during opera­tions. Integrating its cutters with their naval coun­terparts will enable the Coast Guard to remain instrumental in ensuring maritime security.

The list of Coast Guard accomplishments in 2006 is expansive, and the service's relevancy was spot­lighted during the response to Hurricane Katrina. In 2006, revisions were made in the Deepwater pro­gram, which proved its worth during Hurricane Katrina as the Coast Guard cutters with upgraded communication equipment were able to provide effective on-scene coordination of rescue operations with other military units, federal agencies, and local first responders.[14]

However, the Coast Guard needs to modernize and expand its capabilities further as it continues to meet the country's urgent and growing maritime security needs. Since 9/11, the Coast Guard has been modernizing its rapidly aging fleet, but addi­tional money is required to fully support the Coast Guard's new homeland security missions. Addi­tional funding is needed in FY 2008 to accelerate U.S. Coast Guard modernization, particularly the Deepwater program, and to fill the need for addi­tional cutters, patrol boats, and aircraft and for tech­nology upgrades.

To meet the goals of a 10-year accelerated pro­gram, Congress needs to allocate $1.5 billion to Deepwater for FY 2008-almost double the Admin­istration's proposed $788 million. A 2003 Coast Guard study comparing the costs of implementing the program over 20 years versus the costs over 10 years shows that the accelerated 10-year program would save taxpayers $4 billion.[15]

However, an accelerated program requires strin­gent oversight. Out of necessity, the Coast Guard has continued to strengthen management of this program. At a recent congressional hearing, the Coast Guard Commandant stated:

Deepwater is critically important to the Coast Guard in sustaining future readiness, to put the right tools in the hands of our peo­ple as has been stated. I have no higher pur­pose as the commandant than to put those tools into the hands of our people and to do it efficiently, effectively, and mindful of the stewardship responsibilities we have. Deep­water is essential to the Coast Guard's future in many ways. It is the Coast Guard's future. We have to get it right.[16]

Noting the challenges being addressed by the Coast Guard, Admiral Thad Allen also outlined the significant accomplishments of the Deepwater pro­gram, which include:

  • Command, control, and sensor upgrades to all 39 medium-endurance and high-endurance cutters;
  • Completion of the first HC-144A Maritime Patrol Aircraft;
  • New construction of Deepwater shore facilities, including a surface ship training center; and
  • Continuation of the Mission Effectiveness Pro­gram for 110-foot patrol boats.[17]

The Maritime Security Response Teams (MSRTs) and Maritime Safety and Security Teams, the Coast Guard's maritime counterterrorism forces, also require additional funding to support their critical missions of effectively protecting against, deterring, and rapidly responding to maritime terrorist threats as part of the DHS's layered strategy for protecting seaports and waterways. The MSRTs need addi­tional "assets and training to be fully mission-capa­ble, as well as further integration into all national [counterterrorism] response plans."[18] The Coast Guard's maritime security teams are facing equip­ment, personnel, and communications shortages and lack a precision marksman program.

The MSRTs also lack adequate organic mobility, particularly helicopter lift, which is essential for quick response. The MH-60M multi-mission heli­copter is interoperable with counterterrorism assets and, in terms of space and capabilities, is far supe­rior to the HH-60s currently in use. Specifically, the Gulf Coast and West Coast MSRTs will require addi­tional funds in FY 2008.

To improve maritime security, Congress should:

  • Provide additional funding for the accelerated 10-year Deepwater program, which will supply the Coast Guard with much-needed assets while saving taxpayers money in the long run;
  • Consider providing additional funds in FY 2008 for effective intelligence and early warn­ing, domestic counterterrorism, and border and transportation security programs;
  • Support the Coast Guard's goal of establishing a "new deputy commandant for mission sup­port [that] will oversee the design, acquisition and construction of new ships and aircraft and the maintenance of the fleet once they are built, functions that are now managed sepa­rately";[19] and
  • Provide additional funding for the Coast Guard maritime security teams.


The right security solutions often require initia­tive from state and local governments, the private sector, communities, and individuals. When con­sidering the DHS budget request for FY 2008, Con­gress should take a comprehensive approach to homeland security spending. Currently, DHS offi­cials must work their way haphazardly through piecemeal legislation offered by Congress with lim­ited oversight. Instead, Congress should offer a clear road map for homeland security by passing both authorization and appropriations FY 2008 homeland security bills.

Mackenzie M. Eaglen is Senior Policy Analyst for National Security in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.

[1]U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Budget in Brief, Department of Homeland Security FY 2008, p. 9, at 1, 2007).

[2]James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., "Bush's Homeland Security Budget: Dollars That Make Sense," Heritage Foundation WebMemo No. 1343, February 6, 2007, at

[3]Mackenzie M. Eaglen, "Homeland Security Authorization Key to DHS Performance, Oversight," Heritage Foundation WebMemo No. 1240, October 25, 2006, at

[4]Council for Excellence in Government, "Are We Ready?" December 14, 2006, p. 18, at (February 20, 2007).

[5]James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., "Homeland Security Spending for the Long War," Heritage Foundation Lecture No. 989, January 30, 2007, at

[6]U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Budget in Brief, pp. 29 and 38.

[7] Ibid., pp. 38-39.

[8]For a discussion of the drawbacks of this approach, see James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., "Better, Faster, Cheaper Border Security Requires Better Immigration Services," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2011, February 28, 2007, at

[9]U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Budget in Brief,p. 46.

[10] Ibid., p. 83.

[11] Ibid., p. 108.

[12]Eaglen, "Homeland Security Authorization Key to DHS Performance, Oversight."

[13]James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., "Talking Through Disasters: The Federal Role in Emergency Communications," Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1951, July 17, 2006, at

[14]Carafano, "Homeland Security Spending for the Long War."

[15]U.S. Coast Guard, "Report to Congress on the Feasibility of Accelerating the Integrated Deepwater System," March 2003, pp. 5-6, at (June 30, 2006).

[16]Admiral Thad Allen, Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, testimony before the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives, January 30, 2007, at /static/reportimages/CE6ED96E1D82FC727B8F07AC7D4F0188.pdf(February 20, 2007).

[17] Ibid., p. 4.

[18]Jose Rodriguez and Michael Kichman, "Counterterrorism Force," Proceedings, Vol. 63, No. 1 (Spring 2006), p. 90, at (February 20, 2007).

[19]Eric Lipton, "Coast Guard Chief Announces Plans to Overhaul the Service," The New York Times, February 14, 2007, p. A22.


Mackenzie Eaglen
Mackenzie Eaglen

Senior Research Fellow