Moscow's Courtship of Mexico

Report Europe

Moscow's Courtship of Mexico

July 5, 1988 28 min read Download Report
James L.

(Archived document, may contain errors)

I 660 July 5,19 88 I n MOSCOW'S INTRODUCTION COURTSHIP OF .MEXICO I An agreement in principle for an exchange of visits between Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev and Mexican President.Migue1 de la Madrid probably after the July 1988 Mexican elections accentuates the growing relationship between the two countries Moscow's ties with Mexico have become closer than those.withmy.othennation. imtheb I.

Americas except Cuba. The durability of the Soviet-Mexican connection is an effectof Mexico's proximity to the United States and Mexico's traditional policy of seeking an extra-hemispheric counterweight to the overpowering presence and influence of its northern neighbor. The Soviet strategy is to exploit the reservoirs of anti-American sentiment in Mexico, which lost'abo u t half its territory to the U.S: in the Mexican-Aherican War of 1846-1848 I I I In recent years particularly since Mikhail Gor6ach.ev came topower the Soviet Union has been striving to build up political and econo& links with important noncommunist countr i es in the Third World. Its approach to Mexico fits this pattern An exchange of official visits culminated in the autumn of, 1986 with the arri~al!oESo~iee Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze in Mexico City. This was the first visit by a Soviet f This is t he ninth in a series of Heritage studies on Mexico. It was preceded by Backgroujrder No. 638 Evolution of Mexico's Foreign Policy Much 11,1988 Backpunder No. 611 Privatization in Mexico: Robust Rhetoric, Anemic Reality October 22,1987 Backgrouirder No. 59 5 Keys to Understahding Mexico: The PAN'S Giowlh as a Real Opposition July 29,1987 Backpurider No. 588 Deju Vu of Policy Failure: The New $14 Billion Mexican Debt Bailout June 25,1987 Backpunder No. 583 For Mexico's Ailing Economy Time Runs Short June 4,19 8 7 Backpurider No. 581 Mexico's Many Faces" (May 19,1987 Backgrounder No. 575 Mexico: The Key Players April 4,1987 and Backgrounder No. 573 Keys to Understanding Mcxico: Challenges to the Ruling PRI" (April 7,1987 Future papers will examine other aspects o f Mexican policy and development foreign minister to any Latin American nation aside from Cuba. Shevardnadze's journey reflected a shift from the time of his predecessor, Andrei Gromyko, who had focused primarily on the U.S.-Soviet relationship and display ed scant interest in the Third World.

The joint communique issued after Shevardnadze's visit registered concurrence between the two countries on such issues as arms control, a nuclear test ban, and support for the peace process in Central America Steering Mexico Away from the U.S. The Kremlin has attempted to steer Mexican policy away from U.S. influence. For example, the Soviets have encouraged Mexican efforts to fashion a peace settlement in Central America and to strengthen regional solidarity in a mann er that would dilute the role of the U.S. The Soviets also have made many attempts to stimulate trade with Mexico, but the results to date have been meager.

The USSR's dual-track policy toward Mexico has comprised both state-to-state and party-to-party rel ations. While Moscow conducts normal diplomatic relations with the Mexican government, the Communist Party of the Soviet UnionI(CPSU) maintains a bilateral link with the Mexican Communist Party (PCM). Founded in 1919, just two years after the Bolshevik Re v olution in Russia, the PCM plays a leading role in the Unified Socialist Party of Mexico (PSUM), a coalition of five left-wing parties. The Soviets will be watching closely to see how well the PSUM fares in this year's Mexican presidential elections 1 A T h reat of Soviet-Mexican Military Cooperation. On still another level, the KGB residency in Mexico is one of the Soviet Union's largest and most active in the world. It works closely with agents of the Cuban intelligence service in Mexico, and together, the i r potential for subverting the Mexican government is formidable. They also could use their presence as leverage to prod Mexico into close cooperation with the communist bloc. For the present, however, Moscow is focusing on improved political and economic r elations with Mexico City. The U.S. will have to remain alert to the possibility that these relations might expand into the military sphere, thus posing a threat to U.S. interests south of the border MEXICO'S IMPORTANCE TO MOSCOW The Soviet Union regards M exico as a strategic prize. The US-Mexican border is 1,987" miles long and constitutes, in effect, a secure American strategic flank. This. has meant that the U.S. has been able to conduct its foreign policy across two oceans without worrying about a thre a t from the south. If the Soviets established a firm political foothold in or succeeded in destabilizing Mexico, the Kremlin would gain major advantages and U.S strategic interests would be severely affected. Not only would the U.S. have to devote consider a ble military manpower and resources to guarding its southern frontier, but the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean-sea lanes-of-communication would be vulnerable to Soviet - and Cuban interdiction. Ships transiting these waters now carry large quantities of o il and other commodities to and from U.S. ports. Equally important, these sea routes would be needed to ferry U.S. troops and materiel to the NATO allies in a military crisis or war in Europe 2 Moscow's recently acquired ability' to project military power (and thus political influence into Central and South America has further heightened its interest in the region. For example, the Caribbean was once a US. lake but now is the site of Soviet naval facilities (in Cuba) and of joint Soviet-Cuban naval exercis es as recently as October 1986.l The shifting military balance in this strategic sea has generated tangible political effects in the neighboring countries, including Mexico.

Gentleman's Agreement. Mexico has other attractions for Moscow. With more than 81 million people, it is the planet's eleventh most populous nation. It has the world's fourth largest oil reserves (some 69 billion barrels as of last month) and is the main foreign supplier of oil to the U.S. Despite a number of serious economic problems, M exico has emerged as an important player in regional affairs and could give the Soviet Union an entree for raising its profile and enhancing its legitimacy in Latin America There are some indications that the reigning political party; the PRI (Institution a l Revolutionary Party may have made a gentleman's agreement with Cuba and, by extension, the Soviet Union: Mexico will counter U.S. efforts to ostracize the Castro regime and limit Soviet-Cuban influence in the region, while Moscow and Havana in turn refr a in from sponsoring efforts to destabilize Mexico I SOVIET ESPIONAGE, SUBVERSION, AND INTELLIGENCE GATHERING I Mexico holds great importance for the Kremlin as the site of the largest Soviet embassy in Latin America and one of the largest in any non-Soviet bloc nation. Many of the diplomats" attached to the embassy staff are intelligence officers. According to John Barron, an expert on Soviet espionage, "During the 1960s the KGB had completely taken over the Soviet embassy in Mexico City and developed it in t o one of the world's great sanctuaries of subversion.'I2 The Washington Ernes last year reported that Mexico City remains "the KGB's biggest overseas 'residency' and principal. center, for. activities against the United States.I3 Mexico City is a long-est a blished Soviet listening post and intelligence gathering center in the Americas Espionage Activities There'are more than 400 Soviet personnel operating in Mexico City, of whom 30 percent to 40 percent reportedly are affiliated with the KGB or the GRU (mil itary intelligence services. A Mexican counterintelligence specialist has said that "Mexico is one giant safehouse" for the Soviets and their East European and Cuban sister services.

The open U.S.-Mexican border, the huge size and congestion of Mexico City (enabling agents to elude surveillance and-Mexico's relatively-complacent attitude towardespionage 1 Soviet Military Power, 1987 (Washington, D.C U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 p. 120 2 John Barron, KGB: The Secret Work ofSoviet Secret Agents (New York Bantam Books, 1974 p. 313 3 77ie Washington Tirnes, September 2,1987 3 (so long as Mexico itself is not the target) greatly facilitate Soviet operations. These involve primarily recruiting and "running1' agents into and out.of the U.S; and stealing h i gh-tech equipment and defense-related information. The KGB in Mexico City works very closely with the Soviet consulate in San Francisco, which specializes in the illegal acquisition of sophisticated technology from California's Silicon Valley In the 1970s , Christopher Boyce and Andrew Daulton Lee, employees of a leading U.S technology firm, passed top secret U.S. documents and satellite photographs to the Soviets at their embassy and elsewhere in Mexico. The activities of these two later were portrayed in the book and film The Falcon and the Snowman. In 1981 Joseph G. Helmich Jr a U.S.

Army warrant officer, pleaded guilty to two decades of supplying cryptographic and other military information to the Soviets in Mexico City and in Paris ir Targets for Espion age. The Soviets reportedly now are seeking permission from Mexico to open consulates in areas near the U.S. border. Among their targets for intelligence gathering are strategic defense and other military-related facilities in7theLAmerican Southwest. In 1 9 81, the Mexican Foreign Ministry reportedly approved the establishment of consulates in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez; but President Jose Lopez Portillo, presumably to avoid provoking the U.S vetoed the request. The Soviets had to settle for a consulate in Ve r acruz, some 485 miles from the U.S. border Subversion Although most of the Soviet espionage effort is targeted at the U.S the KGB also has meddled in Mexico's internal affairs. In 1959, for example, two KGB"agents.bribed labor leader Demetrio Vallejo with one million pesos 80,000) to paralyze the national railway system in a series of wildcat strikes The most dramatic KGB-sponsored action against the Mexican government involved the creation at the end of the 1960s of the Revolutionary Action Movement (MAR which was designed to foment revolutionary violence and civil war This scheme.was foiled on the eve of its planned implementation in 19

71. Oleg Maksimovich Nechiporenko and Boris Pavlovich Kolomyakov, two of the KGB's top agents, masterminded- the -MAR operation.

Working through the Mexican Communist Party and the Institute of Mexican-Russian Cultural Exchange, a Soviet front in Mexico City, the KGB recruited Mexican students and radicals who were alienated from the political system. They received scholar ships for study along with political indoctrination) at the Patrice Lumumba Friendship University in Moscow. As graduates, they were infiltrated back into Mexico, where they were to recruit other students to the revolutionary cause I. d Communist Shock Br igades. Clashes between students and police broke out in Mexico City in July 19

68. Student extremists subsequently seized the National University and the Polytechnic Institute and transformed them into armed fortresses. Shock brigades, many of which were organized and led by members of the Young Communist Party or youths directed by the KGB through the Institute for Mexican-Russian Cultural Exchange, played 4 See 77ic Wasltitigto~i,,~tnes, May 21,1985, and Tlte New Yo& litiies, November 9,1986 4 a role in the violence far out of proportion to their representation on the students National Strike Council The government, faced with escalating violence that could have forced it to cancel the upcoming Olympic Games, finally sent in the army. The ensuing battle in the Tlatelolco region in the heart of Mexico City on October 2,1968, caused hundreds of casualties.

Mexican recruits at Lumumba University were directed by the KGB to avenge the deaths.

Seeking a plausible way to deny their role in the confrontation and thereby to protect their diplomatic presence in Mexico, the Soviets arranged for the recruits to receive training in guerrilla warfare and terrorism in North Korea. When the recruits returned to Mexico, the USSR dispatched st ill another senior KGB officer, Dmitri Alekseevich Diakanov, to help supervise a new MAR campaign I The first guerrilla attack in Mexico had been planned for July 19

71. In February of that year, however a police constable glimpsed a group of MAR operative s sketching diagrams of targets marked for sabotage. Within a short time, the policeshad discovered enough caches of weapons and explosives, safehouses, and guerrilla training centers all over Mexico to break the backbone of the MAR leadership. The Mexica n government declared five Soviet diplomats, including the charge daffaires, personae non gratae? It appears that the Soviets were so embarrassed by being caught that they have since.taken special caredo conceal these activities MOSCOW AND MEXICO: THE LATI N AMERICAN ANGLE Central America and the Caribbean Moscow appears to welcome Mexicos assertiveness in the Central AmericadCaribbean region, if the Mexican objective is to reduce U.S. influence. In addition, the Soviet Union regards Mexican interest in the r egion as a potential economic boon. If Mexico were to step up oil shipments to Nicaragua and offer the Sandinistas concessionary terms, for example, the burden on the USSR for supplying that country with its own oil.would decrease. 6 The Soviet-oriented M e xican Communist Party has focused its international activities heavily on the Western Hemisphere. In 1983, Secretary-General Pablo Goniez Alvarez of the Unified Socialist Party of Mexico (PSUM an amalgamation of the Mexican Communist Party (PCM) and four s maller groups, headed delegations to the USSR and Nicaragua. The timing suggested that the Soviets may have assigned the PSUM specific I 5 In 1%8, the Soviet embassy in Mekco-City reportedly housed 57 oficials, all but eight of whom were professional inte l ligence oficers or coopted agents. The size of the embassy was triple that of the diplomatic missions of Britain, France, West Germany, or Japan, all of which, unlike the USSR, had extensive trade and other ties with Mexico that required diplomatic tendin g . See Barron, op. cit pp. 19-20 to pay 6 On a number of occasions, Mexico suspended oil deliveries to the Sandinista regime because of its inability 5 tasks in the international support campaign waged by the communist bloc on behalf of the Sandinistas Buy i ng the Sandinistas Time. Moscow applauded the Contadora peace process in which Mexico took a leading role. This process ostensibly sought a settlement of the Nicaraguan conflict, but its effect was to buy time for the Sandinistas to consolidate their revo l ution and with Soviet assistance, strengthen their military capabilities. Moreover, according to a Mexican diplomat in Moscow, the Kremlin "is interested in seeing the Central American conflict ersist, since this implies a political loss and waste of reso u rces for the United States."f Thus, the USSR favored the Contadora process but not necessarily the substance of the peace plan, which called for the withdrawal of foreign military advisers from Central America and proscription of the export of revolution8 The Soviets also benefited from the leading role in the Contadora negotiations of Mexican Foreign Minister Bernard0 Sepulveda Amor, identified as "a member of an anti-American group in the Mexican foreign ministry that is determined to protect the Sandini s tas from U.S. pre~sure After being forced out of the Mexican trade union movement in the 1940s for his loyalty to Marxism-Leninism, L.ombardo.Toledano founded the Socialist People's Party, which continues to echo the Moscow line and reportedly to maintain close ties with the KGB establishment in the Soviet embassy Mexico's tendency to downplay the growing number of Soviet, East European, and Cuban advisers in Nicaragua, while castigating the U.S. presence elsewhere in Central America, may be changing, howe v er As early as 1981, a U.S. commentator noted that while many Mexicans still publicly pose as the grandfathers of Latin American liberation movements behind the rhetoric lies a deepening concern over the destabilization of Central America In 1984, Mexican President Miguel de la Madrid for the first time linked Mexican security to the Central American turmoil when he said in his state-of-the-union address that the violence that has overtaken the region is a threat to our own sec,urity.lll2 Implicit Bargain. De la Madrid, whose six-year term in office ends this November generally has avoided the Yankee-baiting rhetoric of some of his predecessors.

Nonetheless, de la Madrid continues to support revolutionary movements in the hemisphere. Despite the advent of a democratically elected government in El Salvador in 1982, Mexico has allowed the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN the insurgents' umbrella group, to operate an office in Mexico City and to promote revolution c 7 8 9 1985 10 hid 11 See Busi n ess Week, January 19,1981, p. 53 12 U.S. News World Reporl, October 8,1984, p. 41 Sergio Sarmiento The Meaning Behind Mexico's Foreign Policy Gambit The Wall Stmet Journal The peace plan put forward by Costa Rican President Oscar Arias is noncommittal on t hese issues and Sol W. Sanders, "Mexico, KGB Lending Hand to Nicaragua's Marxists 77te Wcrshiitgton limes, April 23 November 23,1984 focuses rather on internal democratization in Nicaragua 6 in El Salvador. In doing so, he is carrying out the implicit bar g ain that Mexico's ruling PRI struck many years ago with Cuba and, by extension, with the Soviet Union Cuba Mexico's policy toward Cuba must be a source of great satisfaction to the Kremlin, which views Havana as a major geopolitical output in the Western H emisphere. More than any other nation, Mexico has legitimized Cuba's role as a regional actor and a necessary participant in regional decision making The emotional ties between the two countries run deep; Fidel Castro and a group of fellow revolutionaries set sail from the Mexican island of Cozumel in 1956 to initiate the guerrilla war that toppled Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista three years later.

In 1979, Mexican President Lopez Portillo gave Castro a red carpet welcome to Mexico and hailed him as "one of the personalities of this century" and as "a symbol and a legend."13 The following year, Lopez Portillo returned the visit. In Havana he declared: "We will put up with nothing that may be done to Cuba, because we would feel that it was being done to ou r very decoration of the Cuban regime.15 Castro awarded his visitor the Order of Jose Marti, the highest In 1981, as the new Reagan Administration was adopting a tougher policy toward Cuba Mexico signed an important energy agreement with the Castro regime. It stipulated that Mexico would help Cuba explore for oil, sell Cuba propane gas, expand the principal Cuban refinery, and assist Cuba in purchasing equipment on the world market for use in the oil industry.16 Exclaimed an unidentified senior Mexican dipl o mat: "We believe that our brotherly ties with Cuba represent the on1 real diplomatic leverage we Mexicans would have against you gringos in a showdown 111y SOVIET APPROACHES: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The Comintern and Mexican Communism Mexico is one of a h andful of South American countries, along with Argentina and Uruguay, that have maintained friendly relations with the Soviet Union during most of the period since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. The communist movement in Mexico had few indigenous roots an d was sired almost entirely by non-Mexicans. In its efforts to influence Mexico, Moscow utilized the Comintern, or Third International, an organization founded by the Kremlin in 1919 to promote worldwide communist revolution 13 Tlte Economist, May 26,1979, p. 76 14 The News World, New York, August 26,1980 15 The two sides issued a joint communique urging the United States to withdraw from its naval base in Guantanamo Bay, end the trade embargo against Cuba, and stop alleged violations of Cuban airspace [by t he United States 16 The Washington Post, February 8; 1981 17 Jack Hood Vaughn Cuba, Me~co: Who's Co-opting Whom The Wall S&et Journal, June 10,1983 7 The Mexican Communist Party (PCM), founded in September 1919, was officially recognized by the Comintern in 19

20. This makes the PCM the-oldest political organization in Mexico; it preceded by a decade the creation of the now governing Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). During the early 192Os, the PCM played a very important role in the newly emerging peasant movement, the Liga Nacional (National League of Peasants). In 1923 several communist-led peasant bands in the state of Veracruz rebelled against the forces of Mexican President Adolfo de la Huerta. The PCM's prestige grew during this period when a number of prominent artists joined its ranks and gave the party access to social and political circles that were beyond the reach of its proletarian and peasant leadership Early Diplomatic Links In August 1924, Mexico, then under the presidency of General Plutarco Elias Calles became the first country in the Americas to open diplomatic relations with the USSR. The Pan American Bureau of the Comintern (the name chosen rather than Latin American Bureau) began operations quickly. A Central American secretaria t was created, and Bertram Wolfe, a Comintern representative from the U.S edited its monthly publication The Liberator. In 1926 the U.S. communist John Pepper (also known as JoseGh Pogany exclaimed that soon "Mexico [would become] the Canton of Latin Ameri ca referring to Canton's key role in bringing communism to China.

Later, while Aleksandr Makar was Soviet ambassador to Mexico, Soviet-Mexican relations cooled. In January 1930, after communist-led demonstrations against Mexican embassies in several countries, Mexico broke diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union.

Notes University of Pittsburgh Latin American specialist Cole Blasier The Soviet ambassador was ridden out of town on a rail, so to speak; his treatment was so bad that Mexico's refusal to apol ogize was a barrier to the reestablishment of relations in the 1930 In 1930 also, the Mexican government suppressed the communist party (PCM which had attempted to seize power during an army revolt the previous year Climbing Communist Membership. In 1935, during the presidency of Lazaro Cardenas the ban on the PCM was lifted; its membership climbed to nearly 40,000, and it played a leading role in the peasant struggles and the creation of national unions of teachers, miners and railroad and oilfield worker s . The PCM, along with the Mexican government, also lent strong support to the proSoviet republican forces in the Spanish Civil War: Mexico provided asylum to tens of thousands of Spanish refugees, many of whom were communists or fellow travelers. Througho u t this period, the PCM was subordinate to the Soviet Union and, until its dissolution in 1943, the Comintern. The PCM also was very dependent on the Communist Party of the United-States 18 Victor Alba, Historia del Movimiento Obren, en America Latina (Mex i co: Libreros Mexicanos Unidos 19 Cole Blasier, The Giant's Rival: The USSR and L.utin America (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press 1964 p. 190 1983 p. 25 8 In 1947, the PCMs influence was diluted when Vicente Lombard0 Toledano, head of the Confeder a tion of Latin American Workers CTAL founded the Peoples Party. The CTAL was a Soviet front. Evidently created with the blessing of the USSR, it followed every twist and turn of the Soviet-led international communist movement. In 1960 it changed its name t o the Socialist Peoples Party (PPS).

Mexico maintained diplomatic relations with the Kremlin during the Cold War, but the PCMs membership declined to 10,000 in 1947 and to 5,000 by 1952.20 Nevertheless, until the Cuban revolution of 1959, Mexico City serve d as the international headquarters for communist parties in the Western hemisphere. In 1960, the PCM held a secret meeting to reinvigorate the party. Dionisio Encina, who had led the party for two decades, was ousted and a collective leadership was insta l led that ruled until 1963 when Arnaldo Martinez Verdugo became the new secretary general SOVIET-MEXICAN RELATIONS SINCE 1959 The Impact of Mexicos New Foreign Policy Activism I The communist takeover of Cuba in 1959 focused Moscows attention sharply on La t in America, where revolutionary prospects previously had been rated low. The Eisenhower-Khrushcliev summit of that year was followed by the opening in Mexico City of a large Soviet exhibition to publicize the USSRs scientific and technological accomplishm e nts. According to a U.S. student of Latin America, the exhibition was designed both for propaganda purposes and to serve as a legal, yet highly visible, means of testing the United States reaction to a seemingly benign Soviet incursion into its traditiona l sphere of influence.21 The exhibition remained in Mexico from November 1959 to February 1960, when it moved on to Cuba Visiting Poland, Avoiding Moscow. For nearly a decade, Moscow concentrated on perfecting its relationship with Fidel Castro and thus ha d little-time to develop relations with Mexico or other countries in the region. Mexican President JoseqLopez Mateos visited Poland and Yugoslavia in 1963, but he evidently avoided the Soviet Union so as not to anger,the U.S he also reacted cautiously to M o scows signals of interest in closer relations with Mexico? Mexican Foreign Minister Carillo Flores traveled to Moscow in 1968, but accomplished little of substance The Mexican political ferment of the 1960s culminated in the 1968 uprising in Mexico City t h at KGB agents helped instigate and exploit. It was quelled by the army, but it destroyed much of the progressive aura of the Mexican Revolution of 1910 and severely 20 Rollie Poppino, Itrtenratioiial Conttiiiinistit ita Latin Anaerica (New York The Free P r ess, 1964 p. 231 21 Timothy Ashby, TIte Bear iia the Back Yard: Moscows Catibbeata Strategy (Lexington, Massachusetts 22 Sec Yoram Shapka, MEwicaia Forcigti Policy Uiader Echevema (Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications Lcxington Books, D.C. Heath & Co.,1987 p. 17 1978 pp. 41-42 9 challenged the legitimacy of the political system that was the Revolutions ideological heritage Diverting Popular Attention. Luis Echeverria Alvarez, Mexicos President from 1970 to 1976, turned to the international arena to divert attention from the domestic crisis resulting from the riots. Echeverria, who as Minister of the Interior during the 1968 upheaval called in the army, sought not only to burnish his progressive-liberal image on the home front, and to compensate for the frustrations of reforming Mexican society, but also to create a Mexican foreign policy that would move it out from the U.S. shadow.

Echeverrias strong support for Fidel Castro and for Chilean Socialist President Salvador Allende Gossens particularly an noyed Washington and won plaudits from Moscow. In 1973 Echeverria visited the Soviet Union and China as part of a global tour. In 1975, with Cuba acting as a go-between, Mexico established working relations with the Soviet-dominated Council for Mutual Eco nomic Assistance (generally known as COMECON).23 In 1976 a Soviet-Mexican economic cooperation agreement was signed it envisaged Soviet participation in Mexican mining, metallurgy, electric power, and agricultural development.

Lopez Portillo, who succeeded Echeverria as President in 1976, urged Mexicos political parties to register for legal status, in return for which they would obtain guaranteed seats in the Chamber of Deputies. The PCM registered in 1977, thereby creating a favorable atmosphere for Lope z Portillos visit to the Soviet Union in May 19

78. The visit reversed the low profile that Moscow had maintained toward Latin America after the overthrow of Allende in 19

73. It also underscored the improvement in Soviet-Mexican relations since two Sovie t diplomats had been expelled from Mexico in 1969 for spying and five others were deported in 1971 in connection with the MAR affair Oil, the Fuel for the Soviet-Mexican Connection The most significant result of Lopez Portillos 1978 visit was the agreemen t by which Mexico would supply crude oil to Cuba in exchange for the delivery of Soviet oil to Mexican customers in Greece, Turkey, and Eastern Europe. The volume of exports to Cuba was to reach 7,000 barrels er day almost one-third of Mexicos total oil ex p orts at the time the accord was signed. Mo cow called the talks between Lopez Portillo and Leonid Brezhnev an historic milestone.2S The deal, however, apparently fell through. Observes William and Mary College Professor of Government George Grayson the So v iets prefer the nuisance of dispatching tankers from the Black Sea to Havana rather than relinquishing the political leverage that comes from controlling their satellites energy lifeline.26 Catering to Mexicos Desire. Aside from the oil deal, agreements o n strengthening trade cultural, athletic, and other forms of cooperation were concluded by Lopez Portillo during 23 See Marian Leighton, Mexico, Cuba, and the Soviet Union: Ferment in the U.S. Backyard, Radio Libeq 24 Business Week, July 3,1978 25 Imestia, August 4,1979 26 George W. Grayson, The PoZitics ofMexican Oil (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1980 p. 177 Research, December 27,1979, p. 8 10 his 1978 visit to Moscow. The two sides agreed to step up exchanges of parliamentary and other dele gations to foster closer bilateral ties. In Moscow, meanwhile, Lopez Portillo extolled the virtues of U.S.-Soviet detente at a time when Moscow's adventurism in the Third World and human rights violations had largely discredited detente in Washington.

At the same time, the Kremlin was catering to Mexico's desire to play a more conspicuous role on the world stage. The spectacle of Fidel Castro's elevation under Soviet tutelage to a figure of international importance was not lost on Lopez Portillo even w hen weighed against Moscow's extensive political'and economic influence over Cuba.

Soviet-Mexican economic and scientific relations appeared to move forward after a several years hiatus with the announcement in August 1986 by Soviet charge d'affaires in Me xico City Gennadiy I. Zima that the two countries were working on a new ,oil transport accord. Zima offered to continue to supply Soviet oil to Mexican customersin Europe in exchange for the supply of Mexican crude to Cuba. In addition, Zima said that the USSR had offered Mexico the use of technical services for economic.and scientific pursuits in outer space 27 Growing Trade Ties Under Secretary of Foreign Relations Jorge Eduardo Navarrete visited the Soviet Union in June 1979 to capitalize on the improve d ties that had resulted from Lopez Portillo's trip.

Navarrete signed an accord establishing exchange programs in education, culture, and the social sciences and expressed a desire for closer bilateral ties with member nations of COMECON, the Soviet bloc t rading group I Soviet exports to Mexico during the 1970s averaged a mere $9 million yearly. By the beginning of this decade, this figure had climbed to about $24 million. In 1979 Izvatia reported that "the creation of a [COMECON]-Mexico mixed commission i s he1 in to develop business contacts with the Soviet Union and other Socialist countries."

Raul Salinas Lozano, director-general of the Mexican Foreign Trade Institute (and the father of the man chosen by theding PRI as its 1988 presidential candidate), h eaded a trade delegation to the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Romania, and Yugoslavia. He stated that Mexico wanted to give its trade with the Socialist countries greater stability and permanence Jig J' In 1981 29 In 1983 the USSR and Mexico formed a Joint Comm i ssion for.Economic Trade and Coordination. The Soviets promised to construct two textile factories in the state of Chihuahua, bordering the U.S. The Mexicans will sell steel products, pipes, and oil-drilling equipment to the Soviet Union, send workers the r e for training, and explore possibilities I t I 27 basiglit, August 31,1987, p. 37 28 Izveslia, August 4,1979 29 Notinter, Mexico City, June 5,1981 11 for the joint manufacture of tractors.30 The Soviets already export machinery and tools for the textileh d ustry to Mexico and import coffee, pimentos, men's clothing, and some sugar Soviet Probes for Defense Ties A five-day visit to Moscow in September 1979 by Mexico's Secretary of National Defense Felix Galvan Lopez generated speculation- that Mexico's growi n g contact with the Soviet Union might expand to military-related activities As a guest of Soviet Defense Minister Dmitri F. Ustinov, Galvan Lopez visited the Frunze Military Academy and a military district headquarters in Leningrad, where he inspected Sov i et weaponry. Although he denied that Mexico was shopping for military equipment, Galvan Lo ez announced that his country might send some officers to Soviet military training schools. According to the Soviet armed forces newspaper, Kimnayu Zvezda, the two d efense officials promised "to make an effort to expand bilateral ties in the military ~phere Then in July 1980, General of the Army Ivan Pavlovsky, a Soviet deputy minister of defense, journeyed to Mexico to participate in National Day celebration Despite these 'exchanges;however, Mexico remains unlikely to strain its relations with the U.S. by embarking upon more substantive military ties with the Soviets 8 A Soviet naval task force in 1985 was scheduled to pay a port call to Mexico the first ever by Sovi e t naval vessels. Moscow tested U.S. reaction to this by leaking news of the call at the southern port of Veracruz via the Mexico City offices of the Cuban newspaper Prema Latina. Washington expressed concern but claimed that "Mexico is a sovereign nation t hat can make its own decisions on such matters." U.S. pressure, however, ultimately forced the cancellation of the visit Political and Economic Developmentsl in the 1980s Soviet-Mexican relations have grown during this decade, even though Mexico voted in I favor of U.N. resolutions implicitly condemning the invasion of Afghanistan; Mexico ignored the U.S.-sponsored boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics and sent a .team of athlete to the Games. Mexican Foreign Minister, Jorge .Castaneda visited Moscow in 1981 . 3 The following year, Geidar Aliyev, then a candidate member of the Soviet Communist Party's Politburo, headed a Soviet delegation to Mexico. In June 1983 the influential.

Mexican newspaper Excelsior reported that a bilateral maritime agreement had been signed 30 U.S. Department of State, Soviet Influence Activities: A Report on Active Measures and Propaganda, 198687 Washington, D.C 1987 p. 65 31 Reuters, September 25,1979 32 Kmsnuya Zvezda, September 26,1979 33 TASS, September 13,1980 34 See The Wasliii i gtoii Post, September 13,1985, and Ashby, op. cit p. 170 35 Castaneda, who served under presidents Echeverria and Lopez Portillo, popularized the concept of dependencia It postulates that the political and economic. problems of Mexico--and of Latin Americ a in general--stem from heavy dependence on the United States and can be resolved only if the region speaks with a single voice vis-a-vis Washington, and Mexico plays a leading role in the region 12involving the training of sailors for joint merchant marin e program. Temirbeck Koshoev vice president of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, journeyed to Mexico City in July 1984, en route home from Nicaragua. The following month, Soviet Ambassador to Mexico Rostislav Sergeyev and Mexican Foreign Secretary Sepul veda participated in celebrations commemorating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of Soviet-Mexican diplomatic relations.

Agreeing on "Virtually All" Foreign Policies. In September 1984, Ivan V. Kapitonov, a member of the Soviet Communist Party Sec retariat and a deputy of the Supreme Soviet headed a delegation to Mexico at the invitation of the Mexican National Congress. During a meeting with President Miguel de la Madrid, Kapitonov remarked that Soviet-Mexican relations constituted a "perfect exam p le" of peaceful coexistence between countries with different socioeconomic systems and was quoted as stating that the USSR and Mexico agreed on "virtually all" foreign policy issues, especially on the need to curb through diplomacy the ''aggressive polici e s" plaguing Central America I Mexico's hosting of an International Peace Conference in March 1986 also allowed Moscow an opportunity for Soviet overtures aimed at promoting friendlier relations. The Soviet Union has been a vocal supporter of the "Delhi Si x a loose coaltion composed of Argentina, Greece, India, Mexico, Sweden, and Tanzania that supports ending nuclear tests and other steps toward disarmament. The Six reportedly have volunteered their countries as sites for monitoring underground nuclear tes ts The Shevardnadze Visit and Its Aftermath The highest-level Soviet visit to Mexico to date has been that of Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze in October 19

86. His was the first journey by Soviet official of his rank to any Latin American country but Cuba.

In the aftermath of this visit, Mexican Secretary of Commerce Hector Hernandez visited the USSR, where he held discussions at COMECON headquarters about expand Mexican cooperation with the organization's member .countries:,.Foreign M inister Bernard0 Sepulveda Amor reciprocated Shevardnadze's visit in -May 19

87. He met in Moscow with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and Shevardnadze, signed an agreement to boost bilateral trade from the $18.3 million figure of 1986 to $300 million wit hin five years and explored further the mutual cost efficiency of supplying oil to Cuba in return for Soviet oil deliveries to Eastern (or Western) Europe FUTURE TRENDS IN MEXICAN-SOVIET RELATIONS Soviet efforts to establish closer ,relations with Mexico u ndoubtedly will continue because of Mexico's regional political importance and because of itsgeostrategic significance as the ultimate prize in the U.S. backyard. As in the past, Soviet overtures will be made against a backdrop of anti-American sentiment i n Mexico, even though almost 150 years have passed since the Mexican-American War 13 Soviet propagandists are adept at exploiting every U.S. snub whether real or imagined toward Mexico. A recent example involved comments by Senator Jesse Helms, the North C arolina Republican, about alleged fraud and corruption in Mexico's political system. Soviet Ambassador to Mexico Rostislav Sergeyev called the Senator's remarks unbelievable meddling" in Mexican domestic affairs in "flagrant violation of international law The Soviets also have planted articles in the Mexican press in connection with their worldwide disinformation campaign saying that the AIDS virus was created in a U.S litary laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland, as part of an experiment with biological It apons Parlaying 'Moscow's Growing Influence. While Mexico is very careful not to ruffle U.S feathers unduly (for example, it has not joined OPEC, although its oil prices are comparable it nonetheless affords the Soviets common political ground on such iss u es as peace, disarmament, more "equitable" trade relations with the U.S anti-imperialism, and support for national liberation movements. Based upon these mutual interests, the Kremlin can be expected to seek an expansion of ties with Mexico in the politic al economic, and cultural fields and, perhaps ultimately, in the military. Then the USSR will attempt to parlay its growing influence and contacts in Mexico into a larger Soviet role in Central America and the Caribbean.

Moscow also will attempt to strengt hen the Mexican left and make it more responsive to Soviet direction. The Soviets will monitor closely the course of the new Mexican Socialist Party, which was formed last year. A coalition of five left-wing parties, including the PCM this Mexican Sociali st Party will have its first test during the this year's presidential election.

If the Communists maintain a leading role in the new party and through it appeal to a broad sector of Mexican society, Soviet influence in Mexico might increase accordingly Mis placed Western Optimism. In the meantime, the USSR, through its diplomatic staff and KGB residency, will attempt to strengthen its position among pro-Communist I organizations, front groups, labor unions, and other bodies to maximize its chances of subver t ing the Mexican government whenever the time is deemed propitious Communist popular front strategy in Mexico already has yielded rich dividendsin terms of.influence in the labor movement, educational institutions, and the media This strategy shows every s ign of being continued and even expanded.

I c The optimistic predictions of many Western observers that Mexico's long-established-and stable political system and its left-leaning foreign policy will insulate it against a communist takeover may be misplaced . The Cubans work closely with the KGB in Mexico, and any destabilization campaign would certainly include the Soviet Union's concurrence.

Growing Soviet-Cuban influence in Central America and the Caribbean could give Moscow the leverage to slow the flow of Mexican oil to the U.S. just when anti-American forces already exercise a potential stranglehold on the oil-rich Persian Gulf. Moreover Moscow will continue to press for deals involving the shipment of Mexican oil to Soviet I clients and customers, the r eby reducing the amount of oil that Mexico has available for the 36 Quoted in El Nucionul (Mexico City June 20,1986 14 U.S. In this connection, it would not be surprising if Soviet disinformation specialists were to spread rumors about alleged U.S. plans t o seize control of Mexico's oilfields IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES Soviet overtures toward Mexico are part of an emerging pattern of communist bloc activity south of the U.S. border. Nicaragua already is under communist rule El Salvador is still bes e t by a communist insurgency, and Cuban-backed guerrilla warfare in Guatemala poses an incipient threat to southern Mexico, especially the states of Chiapas, Yucatan, and oil-rich Campe~he.3~ Similar Indian tribes inhabit both sides of the Mexican-Guatemal a n frontier, and Guatemalan troops occasionally have pursued insurgents across the border. A growing number of Guatemalan refugees live in camps near the frontier. A has pointed out that "if El Salvador and Guatemala have successful revolutio n s, Mexico's political system will come under even greater strain. Leftist groups within Mexico will feel that history is on their side and will pursue more aggressively their demands for a more equitable distribution of Mexico's wealth A "Northern Strateg y " Against the U.S. Soviet agents may well attempt to foment revolution in the northern as well as southern regions of Mexico. It is noteworthy that the Mexican communists claim to be developing a Itnorthern strategy" addressed to the peculiar socioeconomi c landscape of that part of the country. If the Soviets succeed in establishing consulates in the north, their recruitment efforts in both northern Mexico and in the Mexican communities in the southwestern U.S. would be greatly facilitated If unrest in Mex i co, instigated by the Soviets and their agents, reached large-scale proportions, the spillover effect into the U.S. could be severe. Some observers believe that the number of Mexican refugees entering the U.S. could exceed 10 million and that "to effectiv e ly seal the border would take billions of dollars' worth of sophisticated electronics and at least half the U.S. Army's divisions."39 For this reason, the prime U.S. concern in Mexico is the preservation of political stability By the same token, the.Sovie t s: chief aim will be to preclude Mexico's serving as a secure "rear line".of American "imperialism Hamper U.S. Defense Planning. Legitimization of a Soviet role in the Western Hemisphere, and especially in the Central American peace process, could greatly complicate U.S. diplomacy. Even more ominous, however, would be a turn by Mexico toward closer political-military ties with the Soviet Union. Such a policy would hamper U.S. defense planning by forcing Washington to devote its attention and resources more toward its southern border and correspondingly less toward Europe, the Middle East, and 37 Two former U.S. oficials have written that ''the southern Mexican region has a rich tradition of opposition to the federal government. An 1847 uprising of the oppre s sed Indians of Yucatan was so serious that the ruling elite pleaded in vain for annexation by the United States; Great Britain, or.Spain. The rebellion took several years to suppress, and resistance continued until the beginning of this century See Sally S helton Colby and Marshall Lee Miller The Volcano Down Below,"Anried Forces Joimtul, June 1986, p. 88 Winter 1981-82, p. 391 38 Susan Kaufrnan Purcell Mexico-U.S. Relations: Big Initiatives Can Cause Big Problems Fuwign Afluim 39 Colby and Miller, op. cit p. 90 15 elsewhere. It also could jeopardize the security of the sea lanes in the Caribbean and adjoining regions A great deal is at stake as the Soviet-Mexican relationship evolves.

Prepared for The Heritage Foundation by Marian Leighton a member of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency staff a c I 16


James L.