February 17, 2012 | Issue Brief on Homeland Security
FYI: Heritage WebMemos are now called Issue Briefs.
In the wake of 9/11, the government undertook a number of initiatives to strengthen the security and resiliency of the supply chains that power the U.S. economy, safeguarding against both manmade and natural catastrophes. After a decade of experience in trying to keep the free flow of peoples, goods, services, and ideas moving in the face of terrorist threats, it is past time to reevaluate how effective these measures have been and how they can be improved.
No program is in greater need of rethinking than the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), a public–private cooperative venture to adopt and implement best practices. As currently structured, the program lacks adequate initiatives to ensure the robust enduring cooperation of the private sector. Better incentives are needed to keep the partnership moving forward.
Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism
C-TPAT, initiated in November 2001, is a voluntary program offered to businesses by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to help enhance supply chain security. It is intended to create a more efficient way to ensure maritime cargo security while seeking to avoid unnecessary delays in the transport of legitimate goods.
To join C-TPAT, a company submits a security profile, which CBP compares to the minimum security requirements for the company’s trade sector. CBP then reviews the company’s compliance with customs laws and regulations and any violation history that might preclude the approval of benefits. Additionally, CBP conducts an on-site validation of applicant companies to verify security compliance.
By verifying the security measures of the 10,000-plus members, CBP is able to shift its focus to other higher-risk cargo shipments.
Purported Membership Benefits
In 2011, CBP Commissioner Alan Bersin expressed a desire to expand C-TPAT membership to 40,000 companies by 2016. In order to increase membership, Bersin recognized the importance of enhancing benefits for program participants. Presently, CBP members are promised the following benefits:
Industry Criticism and Administration Rhetoric
While CBP’s commitment to extending benefits to C-TPAT members has been strong on paper, in practice, the provision of program benefits has received criticism. In particular, member companies have criticized CBP’s commitment to provide “green lane” treatment in the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other serious supply chain disruption.
C-TPAT-certified companies were told that CBP would issue guidance to top-tier companies on what would happen to “green lane” C-TPAT shipments in the event of a supply chain disruption. More than 10 years into the program, however, CBP has yet to issue such guidance.
In the recent National Strategy for Global Supply Chain Security, the Administration expressed fostering a resilient supply chain to be one of its two central goals in promoting supply chain security. Yet the Administration’s failure to extend guidance to C-TPAT members of response and recovery to supply chain disruption seemingly casts this commitment as mere rhetoric.
Greater Commitment Needed
In order to improve and expand C-TPAT, thereby providing enhanced security for the U.S. and an increase in benefits for member companies, the Administration should:
A Secure Supply Chain
Ensuring a secure and resilient supply chain requires a layered approach based on risk. The Administration should continue to work with key industry partners to enhance and expand C-TPAT to meet both national security and industry needs.
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. , is Deputy Director of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies and Director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Davis Institute, Paul Rosenzweig is a Visiting Fellow in the Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and the Allison Center, and Jessica Zuckerman is a Research Assistant in the Allison Center at The Heritage Foundation.