On August 9-10, President Barack Obama will meet with President Felipe Calderón of Mexico and Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada at the fifth annual North American Leaders Summit in Guadalajara, Mexico. These leaders should focus attention on the strong ties binding North America: a shared commitment to democratic values, free markets, and expanding trade opportunities, the need to meet growing energy needs, and improving security against domestic and international threats.
The 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) enhanced trade and investment flows between the three neighbors. Fifteen years later, NAFTA partners generate an annual GDP of $17 trillion, roughly 2.5 times greater than the People's Republic of China and $2 trillion greater than the European Union. The NAFTA zone represents the largest single free-trade area on the planet, bar none. Working to strengthen vital economic ties and advancing strategies to exploit competitive advantages within a framework of three distinct, sovereign nations will preserve North America as a powerful leader for prosperity on the international scene.
The Guadalajara meeting is a chance to uphold NAFTA commitments, reaffirm support for free market development, and speak out against creeping protectionist sentiments and legislation in the U.S. After years of leadership on this issue, the U.S. may now be the foot-dragger.
Congress's refusal in early 2009 to continue funding a pilot program that permitted 100 Mexican-owned trucks--all carefully monitored and checked for safety--to operate on U.S. highways handed a victory to the Teamsters union and organized labor while betraying a NAFTA obligation. It also provoked a Mexican trade countermeasure that will cost U.S. producers billions of dollars in Mexican market share if not resolved. Furthermore, the Obama White House acquiesced in the protectionist raid on U.S. trade policy that was executed through the shameless "Buy American" provisions in the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. These insular and protectionist actions angered Canada and Mexico by skirting NAFTA and World Trade Organization commitments.
Canada is a democracy with oil reserves second only to Saudi Arabia and abundant quantities of natural gas, but its tar sands with their heavy carbon content have fallen out of favor with the environmentalist and global warming crowd in the U.S.
Mexico, likewise a democracy, currently provides the U.S. with over a million barrels of oil per day, making it America's third largest supplier; however its output continues to fall each year due in part to mismanagement. Mexico depends heavily on the earnings of PEMEX, its national oil company, which provides 40 percent of total government revenue but badly needs foreign investment and technology. To ensure future growth, Mexico must open its hydrocarbon and electricity sectors to private companies.
The Obama Administration promises "a green economy that will create millions of new jobs for the 21st century." Unfortunately, the White House view seems to be that governments rather than markets should direct this massive energy transformation. That is a recipe for inefficiencies and shortages. In order to benefit from the full potential of resources in North America, a realistic, private-sector-based energy program is needed.
The foundations of the rule of law and security in North America are continuously under siege by criminal organizations. President Calderón and the Mexican people feel they are bearing a heavy burden in their fight to dismantle drug cartels and stop the flow of tons of cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and methamphetamines to the U.S.
Since 2006, more than 10,000 Mexicans have been murdered in drug-related killings, 600 of whom were law enforcement and military personnel. Mexico's internal security and future governability are threatened by lawlessness. Mexican drug cartels aggressively push their destructive products on American consumers. They operate in 230 U.S. cities and are America's largest organized crime threat.
Working closely with the Calderón government, the Bush Administration negotiated a multi-year package for counter-drug cooperation known as the Merida Initiative. But implementation has been slow. Some liberal Democrats and leftist U.S. NGOs seek to impede delivery of the assistance, claiming the Mexican military commits serious human rights violations. Meanwhile, the international drug cartels are increasingly shipping their products from Venezuela through rapidly destabilizing Central American countries and into southern Mexico for overland smuggling into the U.S.
Although the Obama Administration has dispatched additional law enforcement personnel to the Mexican border under a revamped Southwest Border Security Initiative, it has also sent disquieting and confusing signals about the direction of drug policy in the new Administration.
For example, White House Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske claims the "war on drugs" is over and that the Administration is now waging a vaguely defined "war on a product" that emphasizes new drug demand reduction and treatment options. The Bush Administration's hard-line stance on enforcement is gone, replaced by softer and more permissive policies that green-light "medical marijuana" and coddle users by promoting "needle exchanges."
Guadalajara Summit Goals
At the Guadalajara summit, President Obama should:
By promoting economic freedom and security, President Obama, President Calderón, and Prime Minister Harper can ensure that the North American Leaders Summit is a success.
James M. Roberts is Research Fellow for Economic Freedom and Growth in the Center for International Trade and Economics(CITE) at The Heritage Foundation, and Ray Walser, Ph.D., is a Senior Policy Analyst for Latin America in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.