In October 2008, the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds (IWG) released a set of generally accepted principles and practices (GAPP) for the conduct, governance, and accountability of sovereign wealth funds (SWF).
First conceived in the 1950s by foreign governments as a means to invest surplus foreign exchange earnings in the U.S. and markets abroad, SWFs have been the subject of intense media and government scrutiny after a flurry of investment deals in 2006 and 2007 caught the public's eye. Because many SWFs lack transparency, critics have been concerned that these government-owned investment vehicles could be used to advance political, as well as economic, agendas.
Some observers fear that rather than using SWFs as a means to hold a diversified asset portfolio and earn a solid return on investment, countries might use these funds to destabilize financial markets, protect industries and companies, or even expropriate technology. With little public information available on most sovereign investors' financial objectives, countries-including the U.S.-began to question the value of SWF benefits and whether action should be taken against what may instead represent a threat to their economic and national security.
In response to the rising threat of nations adopting barriers to sovereign wealth investment, 26 countries with sovereign wealth funds convened the IWG to collaborate with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the OECD in drafting the GAPP framework. The GAPP recommends 24 voluntary principles that, if adopted, will enable countries to better manage their SWFs while promoting investor confidence. Although the current financial crisis has given SWFs a boost in popularity-these days nations are happy to get capital from any source-the implementation of GAPP practices should help prevent a return to the hostile investment environment of the recent past.
During development of the GAPP, IWG nations collaborated with policymakers from recipient countries. Consequently, these nations were afforded a greater understanding of the real issues surrounding sovereign wealth funds, which, in turn, allowed participating countries to balance their open markets with national security concerns. The GAPP should not only result in greater transparency and sounder investment decisions in SWFs but also mitigate the biggest threat to the world's economic and national security-protectionist investment policies.
Sovereign Wealth and the GAPP
The U.S. Department of the Treasury defines a sovereign wealth fund as a "government investment vehicle which is funded by foreign exchange assets, and which manages those assets separately from the official reserves of the monetary authorities." SWFs are financed by surplus foreign exchange earnings from commodity exports, balance of payments or government budget surpluses, and foreign currency operations. These funds are generally established as long-term investment vehicles designed to cover future expenditures on pensions, smooth the effects of volatile commodity prices on government revenue flows, or invest reserves.
Since 2000, the number of these state-owned funds has grown from 20 to almost 50 while managing an estimated $2.7-$3.2 trillion of global assets. The size of these funds can be difficult to estimate because governments are not required to disclose information about the fund's assets, liabilities, or underlying investment strategy. While such lack of information makes it difficult to assess the impact such funds could have on the global economy, even the higher estimate of $3.2 trillion is but a fraction of global investment-conservatively estimated at around $229 trillion in 2007.
Although these funds represent only a relatively small share of the total global financial market, the rise of sovereign wealth funds carries implications for worldwide market stability, corporate governance, and national interests. The GAPP helps to address these concerns by establishing the following objectives for SWFs :
While market pressures are already working to prompt improved transparency from some sovereign investors, GAPP guidance that clearly describes methods of implementing good governance practices, greater measures of accountability, and sound financial investment strategies will help countries to structure and operate their funds more effectively and responsibly. Equally as important, these principles delineate a path for SWFs to ensure that their investments do not distort or destabilize markets in a way that reduces their return on investment or harms the economies in which they invest.
Moreover, the IWG/IMF process promoted meaningful debate and research about sovereign wealth funds. As a result, participating nations gained an increased understanding of SWFs' impact on U.S. and world markets in addition to sovereign investors themselves. This forum should remain active, providing a means to discuss the effectiveness and impact of the GAPP on SWF management and to address new concerns that may arise from global debate on international financial regulation or from countries receiving new sovereign wealth investment. Keeping channels open for cooperation will make it easier for nations to stand firm against implementing protectionist barriers against foreign investment.
The Ties That Bind
The rise of sovereign wealth funds carries implications for global financial market stability and the national interests of countries receiving these funds. Newly released principles should help to ensure that SWFs are managed effectively, make sound investment decisions, and are more transparent. As the collaborative process to establish the GAPP indicates, the growing trade and investment ties that bind the economies of the world together are more likely to promote responsible economic behavior than to entice mayhem. Investment is about creating wealth, not destroying it. Erecting barriers to foreign investment would stifle that creative process, leaving all countries poorer.
Daniella Markheim is Jay Van Andel Senior Trade Policy Analyst in the Center for International Trade and Economics at The Heritage Foundation.