Executive
Summary
In 2004, a task force chaired by homeland security experts from
the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and
The Heritage Foundation (and consisting of representatives from
academia, research centers, the private sector, and
congressional staffs) presented its conclusions in "DHS 2.0:
Rethinking the Department of Homeland Security." Their report
evaluated the capacity of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
to fulfill its mandate as set out in the Homeland Security Act of
2002. Their evaluation was based on four criteria: management,
roles and missions, authorities, and resources. It offered more
than 40 major recommendations and made the case for a significant
reorganization of the DHS to improve this instrument's
effectiveness and efficiency for preventing and responding to
terrorist threats. Many of these proposals in the report were
subsequently adopted by Congress and the Secretary of Homeland
Security.
Four years later, this follow-up report concludes that, while
many still find the department a work in progress, the most
pressing needs for enhancing the protection of the country from
transnational terrorist threats do not lie in further major
reorganization of the DHS or revisiting its roles and missions.
Rather Congress and the Administration should shift their focus to
strengthening the effectiveness of the national homeland security
enterprise as a whole.
The terrorist threat is nimble and dynamic. It exploits the
seams of our society, operating in the gaps between bureaucratic
notions of foreign and domestic, state and federal, civil and
military. To counter this threat, we must build a national homeland
security enterprise that is as agile and seamless as those who seek
to harm us. The objective of this report is to highlight the
most critical tasks for building such an enterprise.
To be more agile, our bureaucracy must foster better decision
making in Congress and in the interagency process, support the
development of a new generation of professionals, and facilitate
information sharing throughout all elements of the enterprise.
Furthermore, to close the gaps where terrorists hide, we must
empower individuals and communities and extend international
cooperation throughout our homeland security activities.
Each section of this report consists of findings and
recommendations agreed upon by the task force. Major
recommendations in the report include:
- Empowering a national culture of preparedness
by focusing on building more self-reliant communities and
individuals,
- Shifting to a strategy that is focused on
building and sustaining a resilient national infrastructure,
- Expanding international cooperation throughout
homeland security programs,
- Developing a framework for domestic
intelligence, and
- Establishing national programs to improve
professional development at all levels of governance on security
and public safety.
The next Congress and Administration have an opportunity to look
at our national homeland security enterprise anew. In doing so,
they should adopt specific initiatives to address these critical
tasks. The Administration should adopt an interagency approach led
by a revitalized, reorganized, and integrated National Security
Council that treats domestic and international security concerns in
a more holistic manner.
In addition to consolidating committee jurisdiction over the DHS
and creating committees to oversee interagency education,
assignments, and accreditation, Congress should establish a
bipartisan caucus that meets regularly to consider issues that
affect the national homeland security enterprise. Both the next
Congress and Administration need to engage private businesses and
the American people-two great, but seemingly forgotten strengths of
American society-more effectively to persuade them to
contribute to and participate in homeland security.
Protecting America at home is a national mission that requires
the concerted effort of the nation, including state and local
governments, the private sector and nongovernmental organizations,
local communities, families, and individuals. Many of the most
vital tasks are conducted most effectively in a decentralized
manner. The national enterprise must facilitate cooperation,
innovation, resiliency, flexibility, and adaptability, not promote
rigid Washington-centric solutions. In addition, virtually
every aspect of domestic security from securing the border to
disaster response has an international dimension requiring the
cooperation of friends and allies around the world. We are facing
threats-naturally occurring and deliberate-that can, will, and do
target all elements of our society. It is therefore incumbent upon
all elements of our society to work together to counter these
threats.
While this report's 25 recommendations are grouped by critical
task subject, many of the proposals are interdependent,
affecting more than one mission area. In particular, the
initiatives regarding community preparedness and resiliency of
national infrastructure and global systems dovetail closely. Thus,
the task force envisions these recommendations as integral
parts of a holistic strategy for building the national homeland
security enterprise that the nation needs, not as a menu from which
policymakers should pick and chose.
David Heyman is Director of and Senior Fellow in
the Homeland Security Program at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies. James Jay Carafano,
Ph.D., is Assistant Director of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom
Davis Institute for International Studies and Senior Research
Fellow for National Security and Homeland Security in the Douglas
and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies at The Heritage
Foundation.
Read the entire report (PDF)