October 25, 2006 | WebMemo on National Security and Defense
Congress's homeland security committees deserve praise for their recent action to improve port and chemical plant security, to boost border security, and to reform the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Broad homeland security policy issues, however, could be better addressed in a biennial homeland security authorization bill rather than in patchwork legislation. A biennial bill would allow the authorization committees to exercise much-needed oversight of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to address the many homeland security issues that have not been covered in individual pieces of legislation, and to avoid reactive stand-alone legislation inevitably proposed in response to the latest threat and directed at ever-changing security concerns. A responsible authorization bill cycle would begin every two years in conjunction with each new Congress.
The House and Senate jurisdictional structures are roadblocks to passing comprehensive policy bills that reach every corner of the Department of Homeland Security. House oversight of homeland security is shared among seven panels, including the Judiciary Committee, the Transportation Committee, and the Energy Committee.
Meanwhile, the Senate's jurisdictional structure is completely different, with one committee undertaking nearly two House committees' work. The Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC), essentially combining the work of the House Homeland Security Committee and the House Government Reform Committee, maintains broad jurisdiction and vast responsibilities that include examining the efficiency and effectiveness of the entire U.S. government. The HSGAC also oversees executive branch reorganizations, the federal civil service, the U.S. Postal Service, the municipal affairs of the District of Columbia, and U.S. nuclear export policy. In addition, the HSGAC, which would be the authorizing committee, does not have jurisdiction over fundamental DHS components, such as, the Coast Guard, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, and the immigration functions of the Customs and Border Protection.
Thus a major hindrance to passing an authorization bill is the Senate's jurisdictional structure. Any successful bill will have to stay within the HSGAC's jurisdiction-leaving out matters related to the TSA and the Coast Guard, for example.
Congress should address the majority of homeland security policy issues that do fall within the relevant committees' jurisdictions in an authorization bill. DHS needs a comprehensive policy roadmap for the 110th Congress beginning in January that addresses issues overlooked in the several security-related bills passed this year in separate legislation. In particular, four reforms should be included in any homeland security authorization bill:
An authorization bill could also provide a strategy for securing the border that would change the bulk of northward migration from illegal to legal by quickly disrupting current migration patterns and encouraging legal migration. This includes measures for land, sea, air, and interior enforcement; rapid response deployment; the assistance of private contractors; the enhancement of state and local law enforcement roles; the deployment of National Guard and other volunteer and state defense forces; and human capital improvements in border patrol recruiting efforts.
Set the Pace
Today, the Department of Homeland Security haphazardly works its way through piecemeal legislation offered by Congress. Instead, Congress should offer a clear roadmap to DHS through a biennial homeland security authorization bill. A strong authorization bill would take care of unfinished homeland security business, as well as set the pace for the next two years.
Mackenzie M. Eaglen is Senior Policy Analyst for National Security, and Laura P. Keith is a Research Assistant, in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.