Congress's
homeland security committees deserve praise for their recent action
to improve port and chemical plant security, to boost border
security, and to reform the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Broad homeland security policy issues, however, could be better
addressed in a biennial homeland security authorization bill rather
than in patchwork legislation. A biennial bill would allow the
authorization committees to exercise much-needed oversight of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to address the many homeland
security issues that have not been covered in individual pieces of
legislation, and to avoid reactive stand-alone legislation
inevitably proposed in response to the latest threat and directed
at ever-changing security concerns. A responsible authorization
bill cycle would begin every two years in conjunction with each new
Congress.
Structural
Roadblocks
The House and
Senate jurisdictional structures are roadblocks to passing
comprehensive policy bills that reach every corner of the
Department of Homeland Security. House oversight of homeland
security is shared among seven panels, including the Judiciary
Committee, the Transportation Committee, and the Energy
Committee.
Meanwhile, the
Senate's jurisdictional structure is completely different, with one
committee undertaking nearly two House committees' work. The
Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
(HSGAC), essentially combining the work of the House Homeland
Security Committee and the House Government Reform Committee,
maintains broad jurisdiction and vast responsibilities that include
examining the efficiency and effectiveness of the entire U.S.
government. The HSGAC also oversees executive branch
reorganizations, the federal civil service, the U.S. Postal
Service, the municipal affairs of the District of Columbia, and
U.S. nuclear export policy. In addition, the HSGAC, which would be
the authorizing committee, does not have jurisdiction over
fundamental DHS components, such as, the Coast Guard, the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Service, and the immigration functions of the
Customs and Border Protection.
Thus a major
hindrance to passing an authorization bill is the Senate's
jurisdictional structure. Any successful bill will have to stay
within the HSGAC's jurisdiction-leaving out matters related to the
TSA and the Coast Guard, for example.
The Essentials
Congress should
address the majority of homeland security policy issues that do
fall within the relevant committees' jurisdictions in an
authorization bill. DHS needs a comprehensive policy roadmap for
the 110th Congress beginning in January that addresses issues
overlooked in the several security-related bills passed this year
in separate legislation. In particular, four reforms should be
included in any homeland security authorization bill:
- Create an
Under Secretary for Policy within DHS. Congressional policy
guidance should begin by elevating the Assistant Secretary of
Homeland Security for Policy to the rank of Under Secretary. When
working within and across federal agencies, stature matters. This
senior position would empower the Under Secretary and the Under
Secretary's office more to consolidate strategies, plans, and
procedures from the vast spectrum of departments and entities that
make up DHS.
- Formalize
professional training and education in homeland security. A
homeland security authorization bill should include professional
homeland security education accreditation requirements for DHS
career employees and federal counterterrorism personnel. This would
strengthen the management of DHS by providing an enduring base of
professional and institutional knowledge for the current and future
civilian leaders of the department. Managers and civil servants in
critical security positions should be accredited by a board of
professionals in accordance with general procedures established by
Congress.
- Reform the
homeland security grant programs to better achieve national
priorities. Congress must continue to refine homeland security
grant allocations in order to meet national priorities. Many state
and local governments still use the majority of federal grant
dollars for equipment acquisition rather than for improving
preparedness or interoperability. Homeland security grant programs,
from the Urban Area Security Initiative to Assistance to
Firefighters, should do more to encourage preparedness, in addition
to equipment procurement. A good example is DHS's requirement that
regions applying for urban grants create plans for preparedness and
show proof of cooperation among local, state, and federal
officials, as well as private sector leaders.
- Enact
comprehensive border security and immigration reform. An
authorization bill must include comprehensive border security and
immigration reform that builds on the Secure Fence Act of 2006.
Effective reform legislation should encourage an expanded use of
the 287 (g) provision in the 1996 Immigration and National Act that
enables the use of state and local law enforcement assets to
enforce federal immigration law. Immigration bills under
consideration in this Congress lack appropriate 287 (g) program
expansion and adequate funding. (See James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., "Build on Section 287(g) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act to Boost State and Local
Immigration Enforcement," Heritage Foundation WebMemo
No. 1212, September 14, 2006.)
An authorization
bill could also provide a strategy for securing the border that
would change the bulk of northward migration from illegal to legal
by quickly disrupting current migration patterns and encouraging
legal migration. This includes measures for land, sea, air, and
interior enforcement; rapid response deployment; the assistance of
private contractors; the enhancement of state and local law
enforcement roles; the deployment of National Guard and other
volunteer and state defense forces; and human capital improvements
in border patrol recruiting efforts.
Set the Pace
Today,
the Department of Homeland Security haphazardly works its way
through piecemeal legislation offered by Congress. Instead,
Congress should offer a clear roadmap to DHS through a biennial
homeland security authorization bill. A strong authorization bill
would take care of unfinished homeland security business, as well
as set the pace for the next two years.
Mackenzie
M. Eaglen is Senior Policy Analyst for National
Security, and Laura P. Keith is a Research Assistant, in the
Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a
division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for
International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation.