August 2, 2006 | WebMemo on Taxes
United States Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist filed a motion on Wednesday that may permit a vote this Friday on a stunningly unprincipled bill. The "Estate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act of 2006" (H.R. 5970), which the House has already passed, reaffirms Congress's control over labor markets, reinvigorates federal death taxes, and strengthens Washington's top-down management of the economy through the tax code. This legislation could well mark the full-throated return of 1970s-style economic policy rather than the usual erratic legislative behavior that August heat and the rush out of Washington usually produce.
Many conservative senators would likely be surprised to learn that they are about to breathe new life into largely repudiated left-wing policy prescriptions. After all, what could be more humane than raising the minimum wage for low-income workers, more economically sensible than reducing the tax burden on the most successful members of our economy, or more responsible than making business tax payments more predictable by not allowing key credits, deductions or exemptions to expire? However, all senators, particularly the conservatives, should stop and consider this legislation before them.
This bill would raise the minimum wage. Everyone wants to see low-income people make more money, and nearly everyone in Congress knows that the best way to see this happen is to have a rapidly growing economy that produces well-paying jobs. Attempts to bypass the economic solution to wage growth end up producing effects that no one wants. Specifically,
Death Tax Reform
This bill significantly reduces the tax rate on estates and substantially increases the amount of one's estate that will be exempt from taxation.
Surely it is a very good thing for the economy and, thus, for job creation to have lower taxes on the capital accumulated by the most successful members of our society. However, this proposal affirms what the general public has rejected: that it is moral to tax a lifetime of hard work and savings. It validates the policy of double, perhaps triple taxation, since the economically virtuous activities that resulted in taxable estates already have produced income taxes. Furthermore, the legislation continues the odd tax practice of one tax eating away at another: estate taxes reduce the amount of income taxes collected by discouraging investment. Investment creates jobs and, thus, more taxable income.
Worse, this legislative initiative stops the movement toward death tax repeal in its tracks. If Congress does not act on the death tax this year, death taxes disappear for one year in 2010, after which they return at very high tax rates. This timeline has kept Congress's attention focused on repeal, the correct moral and economic policy. However, the reform before the Senate keeps estate taxes in place even in 2010 and allows future Congresses to increase tax rates and expand the pool of estates that must pay this tax.
The conservative withdrawal on the minimum wage and death taxes becomes a full-blown retreat when reviewing the damage the Senate could do to future efforts at tax reform. Our current tax code is riddled with enormous tax breaks for particular types of economic and social behavior, and subsidies that the code gives certain taxpayers is a major reason why our broken tax code remains unreformed. After all, why would anyone want to give up a claim to a big tax break? The "tax extenders" about to be considered by the Senate would perpetuate these tax subsidies and, in some instances, increase their value to taxpayers. For instance,
While political expediency is the oil that runs governments everywhere, Americans generally have been assured that Congress will follow principle on the big matters of the day. The legislation the Senate will consider Friday deviates from principle. One hopes that this is just a symptom of the dog days of August.
William W. Beach is Director of the Center for Data Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.