Most Americans would be
surprised to learn that one of the most troublesome issues for
South Korean citizens with the United States is not growing
tensions about North Korea's illicit nuclear weapons program, but
that the Republic of Korea (ROK) is not included in the U.S. Visa
Waiver Program (VWP). The VWP allows nationals from member
countries to enter the United States as temporary visitors without
first obtaining visas at a U.S. Embassy or consulate. The ROK is
currently ineligible for the VWP because the refusal rate for
nonimmigrant visas for its citizens exceeds the 3 percent maximum
allowed under the VWP. The ROK's refusal rate currently hovers just
below 4 percent. [1] Because South Korea is not a VWP
member, South Koreans must endure a complicated and protracted
process to obtain a tourist or business visa, which has
unfortunately contributed to growing animosity towards the United
States.
Even when a country meets
the criteria for VWP membership, inclusion is not automatic. In the
interests of both the United States and South Korea, the Bush
Administration should prioritize the inclusion of South Korea
in the VWP as soon as it meets the requirements.
The
Visa Issue
Ever since September 11,
2001, the United States has faced two daunting tasks: bolstering
border security and placating disgruntled visa applicants
around the world. Because the ROK is not a VWP participant,
tightened visa regulations have adversely affected South Korean
nationals who want to visit the United States. Each of the hundreds
of thousands of South Koreans that visit the United States
annually must apply for a visa in person at the U.S. Embassy
in downtown Seoul, [2] pay a fee, be interviewed, and
(since August 2004) be fingerprinted. These requirements have made
the U.S. consular section in Seoul the largest U.S. nonimmigrant
visa processing post in the world-processing an average of
nearly 2,000 visas per day and straining the embassy's financial
and human resources.
These unwieldy visa
regulations are a stark contrast to the strong U.S.-ROK
military alliance and trade relationship. The ROK has proven itself
a staunch ally of the United States by deploying 3,600 troops to
Iraq, the second largest non-U.S. coalition presence after Great
Britain. South Korea is also the United States' seventh-largest
trading partner, accounting for more than $70 billion in total
bilateral trade in 2004.
The visa requirements,
while arguably necessary due to heightened security concerns in the
post-9/11 world, have regrettably discouraged Koreans from
visiting the United States. Although the total number of
Korean tourists traveling abroad in 2004 increased by 27 percent
from the previous year, the number of South Korean visitors to the
United States decreased by 5 percent, and the number of South
Koreans applying for nonimmigrant visas to the United States
dropped from 420,000 in 2003 to 360,000 in 2004.
The onerous process of
obtaining a visa has also inadvertently aggravated anti-American
sentiments, thwarting Washington's public diplomacy efforts in
South Korea. One highly publicized incident involved the
denial of a U.S. visa for a member of the ROK National Assembly,
who had been invited to the United States to deliver a speech at an
American university.[3] Such incidents only
encourage Korean misperceptions about the United States, and
the arduous process of obtaining a U.S. visa reinforces mistaken
notions that Americans have little consideration and respect for
South Koreans. The fact that Japan, a historic rival, is a member
of the VWP only exacerbates the situation.
The
Visa Waiver Program
The VWP constitutes one of
the few exceptions under the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA) in which foreign nationals can enter the United States
without a visa. Citizens of the 27 participating VWP countries are
permitted to enter the United States and stay for up to 90 days.[4] By eliminating the visa
requirement, the VWP facilitates international travel and
commerce and eases consular office workloads abroad by
eliminating the time-consuming process of reviewing hundreds
of thousands of individual applications.[5] To
qualify for the VWP, the INA specifies that a country
must:
-
Offer reciprocal privileges to
U.S. citizens;
-
Have had a nonimmigrant refusal
rate of less than 3 percent;[6]
-
Certify that it issues, or will
issue, machine-readable and biometric passports;[7]
and
-
Not compromise law enforcement or
U.S. security interests by its inclusion in the program.
Countries can be terminated from the VWP if an emergency occurs
that threatens U.S. security interests.
Although South Korea is
currently ineligible to participate in the VWP, it is clearly in
the interests of both countries for the United States to encourage
South Korea's inclusion in the program. This would benefit both
countries by:
-
Easing the overwhelming costs and
burden on U.S. Consular officials in Seoul, allowing those
resources to be transferred to higher-risk countries;
-
Promoting goodwill among South
Korean visitors and business travelers and increasing the number of
visitors and tourists to the United States;
-
Speeding up South Korea's
conversion to a biometric and machine-readable passport
system, thereby increasing information-sharing between the two
countries; and
-
Eliminating one of the thorniest
bilateral issues between the two governments
U.S. Consular officials in
Seoul have acknowledged their dismay that the number of South
Koreans traveling to the United States fell in 2004, while the
total number of South Koreans traveling abroad increased. The
American Chamber of Commerce in Korea asserts that the United
States is losing valuable tourist dollars and business because
of the troublesome visa approval process.
Recognizing the importance
of this issue, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and
Pacific Affairs Christopher Hill pledged in September 2004-when he
was the U.S. Ambassador to the ROK-to make working with South Korea
to meet the necessary requirements of the program a priority.
To this end, the U.S. Embassy and the ROK Ministry of Foreign
Affairs have held a series of quarterly bilateral Visa Issues
Working Group Meetings since 2004 to discuss strategies and
procedures to facilitate South Korea's participation in the
VWP. In the short term, the meetings have produced a number of
procedures to make the visa application process more efficient and
user friendly for eligible Korean travelers-but the best outcome
for both countries would be South Korea's inclusion in the
VWP.
What
the Administration Should Do
It is in the interests of
the United States to work with the ROK government to assist it in
meeting the VWP requirements and, when it does, to admit South
Korea as a participating country as expeditiously as possible. As
such, the Bush Administration should:
-
Continue to jointly study ways
to lower the visa refusal rate. Until South Korea meets the VWP visa
refusal requirement, the U.S. Embassy in Seoul should continue to
explore ways to improve the existing visa process through better
staff training and more active public diplomacy to explain the
rules and the necessity of the process. Doing so increases the
overall issuance rate, which has the net effect of lowering the
refusal rate without compromising existing standards for visa
denials. The embassy should be commended for making great
progress in recent months to simplify the visa application process
and address common complaints-such as lengthy wait times,
translation problems, and easing fee payment methods.
-
Recommend to Congress that it
consider designating the ROK as a priority country under the visa
waiver program when it
meets all of the necessary requirements. A resolution has already
been introduced in Congress that urges the inclusion of Poland into
the VWP.
-
Provide assurances to the ROK
government that it will be granted membership in the program when
it meets the VWP requirements. Without such leadership assurances of
political will, South Korea will have less incentive to
prioritize meeting the VWP requirements.
Conclusion
Ever since the events of
September 11, 2001, America has understandably been concerned about
immigration and border security. However, the United States should
prudently weigh the benefits and costs of strict visa processes,
such as those that hamper cross-Pacific business cooperation. In
December 2004, China lifted visa requirements for eligible South
Korean businessmen, encouraging greater Korean economic cooperation
with China, perhaps at the expense of American businesses. At the
very least, such Chinese diplomacy makes headway in South Korea at
the expense of increasing anti-American sentiments.
As the United States works
to improve its alliance with South Korea, it should
demonstrate that America is committed to working with its partner
to develop a mature relationship by paying attention to issues
such as visas that, although seemingly minor from the U.S.
perspective, affect South Korean pride and sensibility. South
Korea's inclusion in the VWP will go far in improving
relations with one of America's most important allies.
Balbina Y.
Hwang is Policy Analyst for Northeast
Asia in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage
Foundation.
[1]The
nonimmigrant visitor (visa categories B-1 and B-2) refusal rate for
nationals of a country who have applied at a U.S. Embassy or
Consulate is based on the percentage of visa applications within
this category that are denied. Although a visa can be denied for
many reasons, the most common reason is the applicant's potential
to overstay his/her visit to the United States.
[2]The
only U.S. Consulate in South Korea is located at the U.S. Embassy
in Seoul.
[3]Often,
a visa is refused due to an ineligibility that would prohibit the
traveler from entering the United States even through the VWP, but
the publicity generated by this particular case actually
contributed to further misconceptions about the VWP and U.S. visa
policy.
[4]Foreign
visitors entering the United States for employment or formal study
must obtain a visa. As of April 2003, the 27 participating
countries in the VWP are: Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium,
Brunei, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands,
New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Argentina was
removed from the VWP in February 2002, and Uruguay was removed in
April 2003.
[5]For
a detailed analysis of the VWP, see James Jay Carafano, Ph.D., and
Richard Weitz, "Building the Alliance for Freedom: An Agenda for
Improving and Expanding the Visa Waiver Program," Heritage
Foundation Backgrounder No. 1850, May 6, 2005, at
www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg1850.cfm.
[6]For
details about how the refusal rate is calculated, see U.S.
Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, "Visa Waiver
Program-How a Country Qualifies," May 2005, at
travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1255.html (July
20, 2005).
[7]The
USA PATRIOT Act includes a requirement that by October 1, 2003, all
aliens applying for admission under the VWP must have
machine-readable passports. In addition, the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Reform Act of 2002 requires that by October 26,
2004, all countries participating in the VWP must issue their
nationals machine-readable passports that incorporate biometric
identifiers. However, this deadline was extended until October 26,
2005. Alison Siskin, "Visa Waiver Program," Congressional Research
Service Report for Congress, updated January 21,
2005.