Increasing economic
opportunity and strengthening homeland security are two of the
U.S. government's major goals. Advancing free trade is
essential to reaching both of these goals. Hence, the Bush
Administration and Congress should be praised for significantly
advancing free trade with Australia, Morocco, Chile, and
Singapore.
Now the United States has an even more
important opportunity to expand trade with countries right on its
doorstep through DR-CAFTA, a free trade agreement with the
Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, El
Salvador, and Nicaragua. The Administration should push Congress to
approve this free trade agreement promptly.
The DR-CAFTA countries
have made enormous progress toward democracy and economic
liberalization since the 1970s, when almost all of them were
ruled by dictators and opposed free markets. [1] In recent
years, each of these countries has implemented positive
institutional reforms.
Approving DR-CAFTA would
"lock in" these reforms and encourage these governments to
institute additional reforms. The United States would benefit
significantly from a more open, institutionally stronger
Central America, not just because such reforms open a myriad of
investment and trade opportunities to U.S. businesses and
individuals, but also because they foster long-term peace and
prosperity in the DR- CAFTA countries.
From
War to Democracy
Throughout the 1970s and
into the 1980s, every DR-CAFTA country except Costa Rica was ruled
by a dictator, was in a state of civil conflict, or both. These
countries suffered from great political instability. Their
economies focused inward, and protectionist policies
perpetuated widespread poverty.
Eventually, peace accords
were signed, democratic government returned, and all of these
countries began to promote more open-market policies.
According to the annual Index of Economic Freedom, published
by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal, all
of the DR-CAFTA countries have advanced in their levels of economic
freedom since 1995, albeit at different paces. Nicaragua, El
Salvador, and Costa Rica have opened their economies the most
since 1995 and today are considered "mostly free" economies.
Guatemala, Honduras, and the Dominican Republic have advanced
reform more slowly and are still considered "mostly unfree"
economies.[2]
Advancement occurred
primarily in trade policy and monetary policy.[3] (See
Table 1.) Since 1995, tariffs, non-tariff barriers, and inflation
rates have declined in each country. The level of government
intervention-which essentially assesses the degree of privatization
in the economy-has also improved in all of these countries
except Honduras.[4] In most DR-CAFTA countries, many
businesses formerly owned and run by the state have been
privatized. Except in the Dominican Republic, the banking and
financial sectors have been improved in terms of regulation and
privatization.[5] Wages and prices in El Salvador,
Costa Rica, and Guatemala are set freely by the market, but
Honduras and Nicaragua still control prices to some degree.[6]

The DR-CAFTA countries
have come a long way from the days of dictators, civil chaos, and
conflict, but more reform is needed (see Table 1) and should be
encouraged. For example, none of the DR-CAFTA countries has a
strong rule of law, and the maze of business regulations (e.g.,
labor, zoning, and licensing) makes operating a business
excessively complex and encourages corruption. With the
exception of Costa Rica and El Salvador, all of the countries have
extensive barriers to foreign investment and capital flows.
Because these barriers make participation in the economy difficult,
many of these countries still have large informal
economies.
Benefits
for the DR-CAFTA Countries
DR-CAFTA is a
comprehensive agreement. It would not just reduce tariffs and
eliminate quotas; it would also deregulate the services sector, for
example, by removing local residency requirements.[7] The agreement expands access to
foreign direct investment and fosters transparency rules, which are
essential for doing business in the DR- CAFTA countries. According
to the International Trade Administration, the agreement "requires
regulatory authorities to use open and transparent
administrative procedures, consult with interested parties before
issuing regulations, provide advance notice and comment periods for
proposed rules, and publish all regulations."[8]
Clearly, deregulating the
services sector would benefit U.S. companies that are competitive
in this area. In addition, it would be just as important-if not
more important-to the DR-CAFTA countries' own businesses, enabling
them to increase productivity and increasing the skills of
millions of workers as new foreign businesses and new
technologies enter their economies. With higher skills, workers
will be more valuable and earn more money, increasing their living
standards.
As living standards rise
and people enjoy better lives, their interest in preserving these
benefits also increases. Because they have more to lose from a
crisis, they strive to preserve peace and stability. As a result,
the likelihood of civil conflict decreases. At the same time, the
improved domestic situation reduces the incentives to leave home in
search of a better life elsewhere. Therefore, they are less likely
to emigrate illegally to other, more prosperous countries like the
United States.
Benefits
for America
From an economics
standpoint, DR-CAFTA would open a myriad of opportunities for
American businesses, from exporting to the region to new
markets for investment opportunities. It would also decrease the
flow of illegal immigration to the U.S. However, the ultimate
benefit would come from the economic and political stability the
agreement would bring to the region. As the living standards of the
DR-CAFTA countries' citizens rose, so would their economic
stability and, therefore, their ability to preserve a less volatile
political environment.
Congress should approve
this agreement not just for the sake of the U.S. economy, which
would benefit from expanded markets and lower costs for millions of
imported products, but also for security reasons. A more stable
Central America is key to the long-term fight against
terrorism and anti-Americanism.
Conclusion
DR-CAFTA is an extremely
important agreement for the United States, for both economic and
security reasons. Advancing free trade is one the best foreign
policy tools to help the U.S. economy and improve homeland
security. The DR-CAFTA countries have made enormous progress
toward democracy and economic liberalization since the 1970s,
and the free trade agreement would consolidate their democracies
and institutional reforms.
Congress should approve
DR-CAFTA promptly, not just to open a myriad of investment and
trade opportunities to millions of U.S. business, but also because
DR-CAFTA would foster long-term peace and prosperity in these
Central American countries.
Ana Isabel
Eiras is Senior Policy Analyst for International
Economics in the Center for International Trade and Economics at
The Heritage Foundation.
[1]Brett
D. Schaefer and Stephen Johnson, "Congress Should Support Free
Trade with Central America and the Dominican Republic," Heritage
Foundation Backgrounder No. 1822, February 8, 2005, at
www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/
bg1822.cfm.
[2]Marc
A. Miles, Edwin J. Feulner, and Mary Anastasia O'Grady, 2005
Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, D.C.: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2005), at
www.heritage.org/index.
[3]"Past
Scores," in Marc A. Miles, Edwin J. Feulner, and Mary Anastasia
O'Grady, 2005 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington,
D.C.: The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc.,
2005), Web ed., at
www.heritage.org/research/features/index/downloads/PastScores.xls.
[7]U.S.
Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration,
"CAFTA-DR Benefits to U.S. Commerce," at
ita.doc.gov/cafta/key_benefits/services.asp (April 16,
2005).