With Congress
nearing enactment of a bankruptcy reform bill, a long overdue
bankruptcy comes to mind: Amtrak. That's right. Despite receiving
$29 billion in federal subsidies over its troubled existence,
Amtrak is a private corporation and, as such, is subject to the
nation's bankruptcy laws. And like any other private business that
hemorrhages money year after year, it is time for Amtrak to declare
bankruptcy and get itself reorganized for a better future.
Amtrak's Sorry Financial
Performance
Last year's
subsidy-topping $1 billion-amounted to more than one-third of
Amtrak's operating budget. But despite that aid, Amtrak remains a
trivial -and underperforming-part of America's transportation
network, now carrying less than 1 percent or inter-city passengers.
That's not a lot of bang for the buck.
This year, the
President proposed the elimination of Amtrak's federal subsidy to force long overdue
reforms on the carrier. Already, Amtrak has eliminated a few costly
trains set in motion a few other reforms to cut costs. Nonetheless,
much more needs to be done, and a bankruptcy filing is the best
option.
Bankruptcy is Not the End of
Amtrak
Over the last
several years, both United Airlines and U.S. Airways have gone
through bankruptcy without any major interruptions in service. The
bankruptcy process did force major
changes in the airlines' operations, including significant cuts in
worker pay and loosening of work rules. This prescription can mend
what ails Amtrak.
If Congress "zeroes-out" the Amtrak subsidy
from this year's budget, bankruptcy and its accompanying
restructuring would likely come to the passenger rail sector. For
too long, subsidies have protected a status quo business model
despite its poor record. Whereas the struggling airlines cut
bloated wages and counterproductive work rules to stay in service,
in 2003 Amtrak gave workers belonging to one union a 6.6 percent
wage increase.
This immunity from market realities has led to
worsening losses and declining on-time performance. According to
Amtrak's September 2004 Performance Report, Amtrak recorded an
on-time performance rate of 74.1 percent in FY 2003, but that fell
to 70.7 percent in FY 2004. Claims that ridership is improving
doesn't really hold up, either. In the most recently completed
reporting period, trains run solely by Amtrak actually lost
passengers (especially the Acela), while those lines that are state
supported saw a 14 percent increase in ridership.
Bankruptcy adjudication would force Amtrak to
confront reality and change for the better. Unprofitable assets
will be liquidated, states will have more say in operations, and
unaffordable labor contracts will be renegotiated.
Will the Trains Still Run?
Under bankruptcy regulation, the trustee
appointed to handle the process will likely reorganize the
corporation before any asset liquidation is attempted. Some
promising lines will likely be taken over by state, local, and
regional authorities, while others will likely be abandoned
entirely, as President Jimmy Carter did in 1979 when similar
financial problems led him to shut down four money-losing
routes.
Commuter trains, which often share Amtrak's
tracks, may be forced to purchase the tracks they use or lease from
freight rail companies. A Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report commissioned to examine this issue found that "Two
commuter authorities-New Jersey Transit and Southeastern
Pennsylvania Transportation Authority-told us that they would not
need all of the tracks and other infrastructure currently in place
on the [Northeast] Corridor."
Furthermore,
because these trains run slower than Amtrak's Acela, "They believe
that the physical plant could be pared back to reduce costs." In the long view,
commuter rail will be largely unaffected by an Amtrak
bankruptcy.
Conclusion
It is time for a
serious restructuring of Amtrak. Bankruptcy should be welcomed as a
tool to affect the substantial reform that is long overdue. Just as
United Airlines and U.S. Airways continued to fly throughout their
recent bankruptcies, the trains will continue to run throughout
Amtrak's. And when it is all done, more of them might run on
time.
Keith Miller is
Research Assistant, and Ronald D. Utt, Ph.D., is Herbert and Joyce
Morgan Senior Research Fellow, in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for
Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.