Adolescents
who take a virginity pledge have substantially lower levels of
sexual activity and better life outcomes when compared with
similar adolescents who do not make such a pledge, according
to recently released data from the National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health (Add Health survey). Specifically,
adolescents who make a virginity pledge:
-
Are less likely to experience teen
pregnancy;
-
Are less
likely to be sexually active while in high school and as young adults;
-
Are less
likely to give birth as teens or young adults;
-
Are less
likely to give birth out of wedlock;
-
Are less
likely to engage in risky unprotected sex; and
-
Will have
fewer sexual partners.
In addition, making a virginity pledge is not
associated with any long-term negative outcomes. For example,
teen pledgers who do become sexually active are not less likely to
use contraception.
Data from the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which is funded by more
than 17 federal agencies,[1] show that the behavior of
adolescents who have made a virginity pledge is significantly
different from that of peers who have not made a pledge. Teenage
girls who have taken a virginity pledge are one-third less likely
to experience a pregnancy before age 18. Girls who are strong
pledgers (defined as those who are consistent in reporting a
virginity pledge in the succeeding waves of the Add Health survey)
are more than 50 percent less likely to have a teen pregnancy than
are non-pledgers.
Teens who make a virginity
pledge are far less likely to be sexually active during high school
years. Nearly two-thirds of teens who have never taken a pledge are
sexually active before age 18; by contrast, only 30 percent of
teens who consistently report having made a pledge become sexually
active before age 18.
Teens who have made a
virginity pledge have almost half as many lifetime sexual
partners as non-pledgers have. By the time they reach their
early twenties, non-pledgers have had, on average, six different
sex partners; pledgers, by contrast, have had three.
Girls who have taken a
virginity pledge are one-third less likely to have an
out-of-wedlock birth when compared with those who have never taken
a pledge. Girls who are strong pledgers (those who are consistent
in reporting a virginity pledge in the succeeding waves of the Add
Health survey) are half as likely to have an out-of-wedlock birth
as are non-pledgers.
Girls who make a virginity
pledge also have fewer births overall (both marital and nonmarital)
as teens and young adults than do girls who do not make pledges. By
the time they reach their early twenties, some 27.2 percent of the
young women who have never made a virginity pledge have given
birth. By contrast, the overall birth rate of peers who have made a
pledge is nearly one-third lower, at 19.8 percent.
Because they are less
likely to be sexually active, pledging teens are less likely to
engage in unprotected sex, especially unprotected nonmarital
sex. For example, 28 percent of non-pledging youth reported
engaging in unprotected nonmarital sex during the past year,
compared with 22 percent of all pledgers and 17 percent of strong
pledgers.
One possible explanation
for the differences in behavior between pledgers and non-pledgers
is that the two groups differ in important social background
factors such as socioeconomic status, race, religiosity, and school
performance. It is possible that these background
factors-rather than the pledge per se-account for the
differences in sexual behavior and birth rates.
To investigate this
possibility, the authors performed multivariate regression
analyses that compared individuals who were identical in
relevant background factors. These analyses show that, although the
magnitude of the differences was reduced somewhat, differences in
the behavior of pledging and non-pledging teens persisted even when
background factors such as socioeconomic status, race, religiosity,
and other relevant variables were held constant.
Overall, making a
virginity pledge is strongly associated with a wide array of
positive behaviors and outcomes while having no negative effects.[2] The findings presented in this
paper strongly suggest that virginity pledge and similar
abstinence education programs have the potential to
substantially reduce teen sexual activity, teen pregnancy, and
out-of-wedlock childbearing.
Background
For more than
a decade, organizations such as True Love Waits[3] have
encouraged young people to abstain from sexual activity. As part of
these programs, young people are encouraged to take a verbal or
written pledge to abstain from sex until marriage. In recent years,
increased public policy attention has been focused on adolescents
who take these "virginity pledges" as policymakers seek to assess
the social and behavioral outcomes of such abstinence
programs.
One major source of data
on teens who have made virginity pledges is the National
Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, funded by the
Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies.
The Add Health survey started with interviews of junior-high and
high-school-aged students in 1994. In that year, and in subsequent
interviews, adolescents were asked whether they had ever taken a
virginity pledge. The students were tracked through high school and
into early adulthood. By 2001, most of the youth in the survey were
between the ages of 19 and 25-old enough to evaluate the
relationship between pledging as teens and a variety of social
outcomes.
As noted, the Add Health
survey is longitudinal, which means that it surveys the same group
of adolescents repeatedly over time. Interviews were conducted
in three succeeding years: Wave I in 1994, Wave II in 1995, and
Wave III in 2001. In each of these years, individuals were
asked the question: "Have you ever signed a pledge to abstain
from sex until marriage?" We have grouped the Add Health youth into
four categories based on their responses to this repeated
question.[4]
- Non-pledgers. These individuals answered that they had
not taken a virginity pledge in each of the three waves of the
survey.[5]
- Pledgers.These individuals responded in at least
one wave of the survey that they had made a virginity
pledge.
- Strong pledgers. These individuals form a subset of the
general pledger group; they affirmed in at least one wave of the
survey that they had made a pledge and did not provide
contradictory data in any subsequent wave. For example, they may
have reported that they had "ever taken a virginity pledge" in
Waves I, II, and III; in Waves II and III; or only in Wave III. The
deciding factor for placement in this category was that the
respondents' answers were consistent; once they had reported that
they had "ever taken a pledge," they did not subsequently report
that they had not taken a pledge.
- Weak pledgers. These individuals form a second
subset of the pledger group. These respondents reported in at least
one wave of the survey that they had "ever taken a virginity
pledge," but their responses were inconsistent; on a subsequent
wave, they reported that they had not taken a pledge. Either these
individuals ignored or forgot their previous response that
they had made a pledge, or they interpreted the question
differently in later years.
All adolescents were
first placed in either the non-pledger or pledger category. All
pledgers were subsequently placed in the weak or strong pledge
categories. The four pledge categories are used throughout this
paper to measure the behavioral correlates of pledging.
Virginity Pledgers Are Less Likely to Experience Teen Pregnancy
The Add
Health survey data show that girls who have made a virginity pledge
are substantially less likely to experience teen pregnancy (to
become pregnant before their 18th birthday) when compared with
girls who have not made a pledge.[6] As Table 1 and
Chart 1 show, some 6.5 percent of girls who had made a pledge
became pregnant before age 18. The figure for girls who had not
made a pledge was about 50 percent higher, at 9.7 percent. Among
girls who were strong pledgers, the pregnancy rate was lower still:
4.3 percent became pregnant before their 18th birthday-less than
half the number among non-pledgers.


Virginity Pledgers Substantially Delay
Sexual Activity and Have Fewer Sex
Partners
The Add
Health survey data show that teens who have made a virginity pledge
are likely to delay substantially the onset of sexual activity,
compared with those who have not made a pledge. As Table 2 shows,
among non-pledgers, the median age for beginning sexual intercourse
was 16 years and 11 months. By contrast, the median age for the
onset of sexual activity among all pledging teens was 21 months
later, at 18 years and 8 months. The delay in the onset of sexual
activity was even more pronounced in the strong pledger group; the
median age of initial sexual activity among these teens was 19
years and 9 months, or nearly three years later than the
non-pledgers.

Polls show that over 90
percent of parents want students taught that they should abstain
from sexual activity until they have, at least, finished high
school.[7] Thus, sexual abstinence
throughout high school appears to be a minimal value embraced by
nearly all parents. The Add Health data presented in Table 2 show
that a strong majority of pledgers do abstain through their
high-school years, while an equally large majority of
non-pledgers fail to achieve that goal. As Chart 2 shows, more
than 60 percent of all teen pledgers and nearly 70 percent of
strong pledgers abstain from sexual intercourse until at least
their 18th birthday. By contrast, only 37 percent of non-pledgers
abstain until that age. Pledging is clearly linked to reduced
sexual activity during the high-school years.

Delay in initial sexual activity is linked to a number of other
positive outcomes, particularly to a reduction in the number of sex
partners during one's lifetime. Table 2 and Chart 3 show that
teens who have made a virginity pledge report significantly fewer
sex partners. Non-pledgers reported having, on average, 6.1 sex
partners by the time they reached Wave III of the survey. Among
pledgers, the average number of sexual partners was cut roughly in
half: 3.4 for all pledgers and 2.8 for strong pledgers.[8]

Other surveys confirm the long-term linkage between early onset of
sexual activity and high numbers of sex partners over a lifetime.
This linkage persists into adulthood; for example, women who become
sexually active in their early teen years are less likely to have
stable marriages in their thirties when compared with women who
wait.[9] Thus, the relative differences
in numbers of sexual partners between pledgers and
non-pledgers at the present time are likely to continue through the
individuals' adult lives.