The Heritage Foundation
 
  • Heritage Action
  • Heritage Libertad
  • More
  • About
  • Issues
  • Research
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Get Connected
    • Renew Membership
    • Donate
    • All Research
    • Reports
    • Commentaries
    • Factsheets
    • Multimedia
    • Testimonies
    • Lectures
    WebMemo #498
    article icon
    This is a WebMemo On Jobs and Jobs and Labor Policy

    WebMemo- The Heritage Foundation's Web Memo is an online exclusive analysis that supplies Heritage.org visitors with the information they need to follow fast-breaking policy developments.

    Ready to Compete: The Link Between Productivity, Jobs, and Wages

    By Paul Kersey
    May 5, 2004
    WebMemo #498 on Jobs and Jobs and Labor Policy

    May 5, 2004

    Ready to Compete: The Link Between Productivity, Jobs, and Wages

    By Paul Kersey

    • Print

    Share

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • More
    • Email
    • Print

    Nearly lost in the debate over job creation has been the surge of productivity that has taken place over the last two years. Americans workers are producing more goods per hour of work and boosting their own incomes in the process. Increased productivity also means that Americans are in a better position to gain-not lose-in the global marketplace.

     

    Productivity and Wages: Rising Together

    The recent takeoff of productivity is steep. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the output per hour of American non-farm workers increased by only 2.1 percent in 2001, by 5 percent in 2002, and by 4.4 percent in 2003.

     

    The jump in productivity was even steeper in the manufacturing sector. While the hourly productivity of manufacturing workers grew at a modest 2.2 percent rate in 2001, it increased by 7.2 percent in 2002 and by a healthy 5.1 percent in 2003.

     

    Rising Productivity and Wages

    (click image to expand)

     

    And while manufacturing was the one sector of the U.S. economy that was seriously hurt during the 2001 recession, increased productivity still translated into higher wages for industrial workers. Their compensation per hour after inflation is subtracted (so-called real earnings), which declined by 0.4 percent in 2001, increased by 2.4 percent in 2002 and by 3.2 percent in 2003.

     

    There is no denying that the manufacturing sector took serious damage during and after the 2001 recession. Manufacturing employment, which according to the payroll survey stood at over 17 million at the beginning of 2001, declined to 14.3 million at the end of 2003.

     

    The process of creative destruction, by which a market economy winnows out inefficient companies and replaces them with more efficient ones, can be harsh and was with many manufacturers over the last few years. But the worst now appears to be over, as manufacturing employment has remained stable in the first three months of 2004. The companies that survived, meanwhile, appear to be well positioned to prosper in the current recovery, along with their employees.

     

    Shared Interests

    It is tempting to assume that the interests of management and employees are constantly in conflict and that what benefits one, harms the other. One implication of this point of view is the presumption that improved productivity harms, or at least does nothing to help, the interests of workers. But trends in the manufacturing sector show otherwise. Even in the midst of job losses, manufacturing wages improved and did so at roughly the same time that productivity began to show a marked increase.

     

    Increased productivity means that labor itself is more valuable-the same number of workers can produce more goods or produce the same goods at lower cost. Either way, those same employees are in a position to call for increased wages, and their employers are in a better position to give raises. That other manufacturers might be struggling does not necessarily change this happy state of affairs for the firms that are doing well.

     

    Consequently, while less productive firms struggled and closed down facilities over the last three years, more productive firms were still in a position to thrive and spread the spoils to their own workers-hence the sharp gains in compensation in 2002 and 2003.

     

    Ready to Compete

    Much has also been made of the gap between wages in America and the rest of the world. But this advantage has been earned and can still be maintained. American workers have historically held a tremendous advantage in productivity-the product of education, investment in equipment, and infrastructure. As recently as 1995, the average worker in Mexico or Brazil produced only a quarter of what his or her American counterpart could per hour of work, and in Malaysia or India that ratio was ten-to-one in favor of the American worker.

     

    Low wages, by themselves, do not make foreign workers a threat; these can be overcome by expanding that historic productivity advantage, which is precisely what is happening now. As long as the productivity boom continues, American manufacturers will be in a stronger position to compete in both domestic and world markets, and manufacturing employment should begin to expand again.

     

    The recent recession was undeniably hard on the manufacturing sector, but stability in employment numbers, combined with strong improvements in productivity, mean that the worst is probably over. Having fortified their long established advantage in productivity, American manufacturers and their employees face a brighter future.

     

    Paul Kersey is Bradley Visiting Fellow in Labor Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

    Send this report to a friend

    • Print

    Share

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • More

    Send this report to a friend

    READ OUR LATEST REPORT ON Jobs

    Research Review: Who Creates Jobs? Start-up Firms and New Businesses
    Read More

    Americans workers are producing more goods per hour of work and
    boosting their own incomes in the process.

    This report discusses:
    • Economy
    • Jobs and Labor Policy

    About the Author

    Paul Kersey Visiting Fellow

    Read More >>

    Other Reports By This Author
    • Backgrounder How the Employee Free Choice Act Takes Away Workers' Rights
    • Executive Summary Executive Summary: How the Employee Free Choice Act Takes Away Workers' Rights
    • View All

    One good way you can keep up with Jobs and Jobs and Labor Policy

    Jobs, Jobs and Labor Policy,
    Jobs and Jobs and Labor Policy

    Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.


    The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.


    The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.


    More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.


    Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"


    Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."


    Sign up to start your free subscription today!

     
    Sorry! Your form had errors:
             
      Our Iniatives
      • First Principles
      • American Leadership
      • Education
      • Energy & Environment
      • Enterprise & Free Markets
      • Entitlements, Taxes & Spending
      • Family & Religion
      • Health Care
      • Protect America
      • Rule of Law
      About The Heritage Foundation

      The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.

      Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More

      © 2013, The Heritage Foundation
      Conservative policy research since 1973

      • Donate
      • Press & Media
      • Help
      • Contact Us
      • Directions to Heritage
      • Search
      • Bookstore
      • Careers
      • Privacy Policy
      • Copyright