(Archived document, may contain errors)
T1 608 October 5, 1987 THE CENTRE ON TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS: I
HOW THE U.N. INJURES POOR NATIONS The United Nations has a long
history of attacking the free enterprise system.
A key elemeht in this is the campaign against multinational
corporations or, as they are called at the U.N., Transnational
Corporations (TNCs A leader in this attack is the New York-based
Centre on Transnational Corporations (CTC).
Corporations; which was established in 19
74. The Commission has 48 members: 12 from Africa, 11 from Asia, 10
from Latin America, 5 from the Soviet bloc, and 10 from the Western
democracies (including the United States The CTCs annual budget is
$5.4 million, of which the U.S. pays one-fourth, or $1.4 million.
The creation and activities of the CTC reveal some of the worst of
the U.N.
It is not so much that the CTC wastes money, although this is not
inconsequential.
Nor is it even that the CTC mainly has been engaged in harassing
American and oth er Western firms trying to conduct business in the
Third World. What is most serious is that the policies and actions
of the CTC, as of those of many other U.N organs, impede economic
growth in developing countries. The CTC penalizes those nations and
soc i eties that are the globe's poorest The CTC is the secretariat
of the U.N. Commission on Transnational Eosuring Perpetual
P&erty. One of the CTC's main functions, for example, is the
drafting of a so-called Code of Conduct dealing with TNCs. The.
Code has b een in the discussion stage for over a decade and is
currently stalled, mainly because of Western objections. The West
opposes the double standard built into how the code defines a TNC.
Under its. definition, only Western and Third World firms will be
cov e red by the Code; giant 'communist bloc enterprises will be
exempt. -2 A much more important objection is that the Code is
designed to force Western companies to operate according to the New
International Economic Order or NIEO-the U.N.3 prescription for m
andatory resource transfers from the West to the developing world.
NIEO, more broadly, is a strategy that will ensure perpetual
poverty in the Third World.
The CTC also is involved in recommending ways to deal with Third
World debt problems by blaming tran snational banks for the problem
and in devising consumer-oriented information systems on the
activities of corporations. Little effort is made to disguise the
deliberate anti-West and anti-free enterprise motive of these
projects.
Much of the CTC's work duplicates that of other international
agencies, such as the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development
(UNCTAD), the U.N.
Environment Programme, and the International Monetary Fund. As a
result of this duplication and CTCs growing politichation, the U.S.
has reduced considerably its participation in the CTC's work.
While originally the Commission on Transnational Corporations
operated on a consensus procedure, this arrangement ended at its
1977 meeting. Unless the Commission returns to a consensus
approach, which is highly unlikely, the U.S should stop supporting
the Centre and the Commission altogether. This would save the U.S.
$1.4 million annually. Much more important, it would signal that
the U.S rejects the CTC's anti-growth philosophy and refuses to g i
ve credibility to the CTC and other international agencies that
refuse to support policies genuinely designed to help Third World
nations develop economically THE CK! AND THE NEW IN"ATI0NAL
EKONOMIC ORDER The Commission on Transnational Corporations was e s
tablished in 1974 by the U.N. Economic and Social Council, through
resolution 1913 (LVII). The report on which the resolution is
based, entitled 'The Impact of Multinational Corporations on
Development and on International Relations E/SSOO/Rev. 1, ST/ESA/ 6
, 1974 explicitly opposed TNCs, favoring their control by
governments. The report states for example, that TNCs although
powerful engines of growth, tend to accentuate rather than reduce
inequalities in the absence of proper government policies TNCs also
are said to "often exploit natural resources in developing
countries for export to world markets."
The fundamentally anti-TNC purpose of the CTC was confirmed this
April 17 by A. V. Trepelkov, the Soviet representative to the
Economic and Social Council wh en he boasted that "the Centre's
main task [was] to identify the negative consequences of the
activities of TNCs and submit proposals on ways to eliminate such
consequences suppOrting a "New" Order. The Commission, through the
Centre, has produced a numbe r of studies and reports. Among them
is "Progress made toward the establishment of the New International
Economic Order (NIEO The role of TNCS" published in 1980 (E/C.10/74
This report outlines the purpose of NIEO 3 to "redress the economic
imbalance betwe en developed and developing countries and proposes
specific activities for the CTC.
Among those activities are: facilitating.the transfer of technology
from developed to developing nations; regulatory monitoring of TNC
activities; an international Code of Conduct; and a technical
advisory programme t,o strengthen the bargaining capacity of
developing countries. All of these activities and others have been
undertaken by the CTC at a cost of some $5 million per year.
Dr. Murray L. Weidenbaum, Director of the Center for the Study of
American Business at Washington University in St. Louis, charges
that the very production of these CTC "studies" is pernicious. In a
lecture last November at the New York based Lehrman Institute,
Weidenbaum warned Yesterday's stud i es lead to today's voluntary
guidelines which, in turn, become the basis for the treaties and
directives of tomorrow The U.N. and its specialized agencies are
trying to redistribute the income and wealth of the member tio on^
by stepping up their regulati on of private enterprise."
The regulation of private enterprise, however, is not in the best
interest of the developing nations. Far from helping, the CTC's
agenda prevents them from followmg the economic paths that lead to
prosperity THE CODE OF CONDUCI' ON TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS The
drafting of a Code of Conduct for transnational corporations has
been one of the CTC's principal undertakings. So far, however,
there is no consensus on what the.Code should say.
To date, the "a eed" and nearly agreed dra ft provisions of the
Code E(1983/17 Annex Ifdeal with respect for national sovereignty
and development objectives of states, human rights, and
noninterference in internal and international political affairs.
Disagreement continues on most of the issues in v olving the
definition of TNCs, including the definition of corrupt practices;
transfer of technology; clarity of national laws and regulations;
repatriation of capital nationalization; and compensation. Most
important, there has been no agreement on wheth e r the Code should
be binding or voluntary. Western nations fumly favor the 1atter.l
Champions of Replati= The real objective of the Code's supporters
is to impose state reeation of TNCs. Wolfgang Sproete, an East
German representative on the Economc and S o cial Council, for
example, told the Commission on Transnational Corporations this
April 10 that the Code is needed because developing countries had
encountered great difficulties in regulating the activities of TNCs
He was echoed by Nigeria's A.L. Olukann i , who said that TNCs
"must be well regulated 1. See US. Department of State, Office of
Investment Affairs, Current Stafus Report: Selected International
Organization Activities Relating to Tmnsnational Enterprises, July
1986. -4 Western countries consiste ntly have resisted the CTCs
anti-TNC attitude.
West Germany's Jurgen Kuehn noted in April, for example, that
developing countries could not expect both to welcome foreign
investments and to keep blaming TNCs for Third World economic ills.
Above all, Western countries resist the Code's definition of TNCs
which exempts Soviet bloc enterprises. Kuehn told the Commission
that West Germany calculates that there are 141 socialist
enterprises engaged in transnational activities.
In a modest ackno wled ement of this, the Commission in April 1986
passed a resolution that spoke of "the role of enterprises engaged
in transnational operations regardless of form or nature of
ownership and country of origin This year the Commission noted that
the CTC has adequate ways and means to include enterprises
"regardless of form or nature of ownership and country of origin
These statements, however, are far from sufficient in eliminating
the Code's disparities in treating Western and Soviet bloc TNCs
Double Standa rd. The double standard on TNCs is the principal
reason why for more than a year the U.S. has distanced itself from
the CTC.
Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations, told
the House Foreign Affairs Committee this May that from the begin
ning the U.S. has supported a Code of Conduct if it applied to all
TNCs. In addition, said Keyes, the Code must be voluntary. It also
must be balanced, acknowledging that TNCs, as investors in the
Third World, have some rights Alan Keyes Keyes told the Ho u se
Committee .that "key members .of the developing countries and the
Soviet bloc will have to demonstrate a willingness to make some
basic policy changes before there can be a reasonable hope for
making progress on the Code." Because recent negotiating se s sions
on the Code made virtually no progress, Keyes concluded that "we
should not schedule further negotiating sessions until there is
clear evidence that a solution can be found to the major
outstanding issues Ceosoring a Report. The Soviet Union seems d e
termined to preserve the Code's double standard. Four years ago, a
Soviet national, Ralph Tsvilev, Assistant Director of the
InformationmAnalysis Division of the CTC, demanded the suppression
of the Annex to a Center report. The 27-page Annex, entitled "R e
cent Trends in International Business Arrangements with
Organizations and Enterprises in Socialist Countries included a
detailed description of those communist bloc enterprises. The Annex
notes that several Soviet bloc countries have accepted direct forei
g n investment by Western TNCs; that, by the end of 1978, some 359
joint ventures had been established by seven Soviet bloc
enterprises in Western countries; and that over 200 Soviet bloc
enterprises concentrated in foreign marketing activities
enterprises a re TNCs and thus must be covered by the Code.
Tsvilev's successful censoring of the Annex violated the
Secretariat's rule of impartiality. Ambassador Jose Sorzano, then
U.S. Representative to the .Economic and Social Council, told the
Council in July 1983 that "we are outraged both by Tsvilev's
behavior and by his success in suppressing the Annex to the
Center's survey In effect, the Annex supported the U.S. contention
that communist commercial Other disagreements regarding the Code
involve principles of i nvestment.
The U.S. believes that TNCs are entitled to fair treatment; prompt
and effective compensation in the event of expropriation; and the
right to transfer profits and capital freely. Several developing
nations have accepted these principles in bilat eral investment
treaties. Yet, Keyes told the House committee in the bloc politics
of the U.N. system, these moderate developing countries have been
unwilling to break ranks with the more extreme developing countries
and the commuqist states A- OF TRANWAm O Nm BANKS CTCs efforts
concerning the activities of transnational banks have been resisted
by the U.S. primarily on the grounds that they duplicate the work
of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
According to U.S representative to the Commission Walter B.
Lockwood, Jr., developing countries have been pressing the Centre
to be involved in interest rate setting, debt relief and financial
flows. The CTC would appear to ,desire additional international
financial regulation: at one'time CTC even suggested the creation
of a new international financial agency.2 The CK debated
transnational banks at its April meeting but it failed even to
attempt to define a transnational bank. And the CTC 1987 report on
the role of transnational, banks (E/C.10 /1987/13) completely
ignored the transnational activities of the banking institutions of
the Soviet bloc. It seems that only Western banks are transnational
banks.
British Refutation. This position is applauded by Soviet
representative G.S.
Markossov who insisted that "the activities of bank agencies in the
socialist countries were not 'transnational' in nature, nor in
volume A main reason, he noted, is that the purpose of Soviet bloc
transnational banks "is not to collect profits but to promote
bilateral cooperation Refuting this was Britain's representative
Peter Gent. He pointed to the Moscow-Norodny Bank in Britain, which
"now had a network in countries around the world including
Singapore, where it had made some unfortunate real estate
speculations Th is bank surely should come under the definition of
a transnational bank.
Transnational banks are blamed for a number of Third World problems
including their mounting foreign indebtedness. This prompted the
objection of West Germany's Jurgen Kuehn at this A pril's
Commission meeting Blame [for the debt] was put exclusively on the
banking sector and the crediting countries East Germany's Horst
Heininger disagreed and called for "Measures [to] be taken to
induce banks to share the burden" of developing countri e s' forei
n debt. Ukrainian representative Vladimir Kolibanov accused
transnational banks o B "disorganizing the 2. A 1981 CTC report
entitled Tmsnational Banks: Operations, Strategies and Their
Effects in Developin Countries, for example, recommends the e s
tablishment of "an appropriate international agency, fnowledgeable
about the problems of transnational banks, developmg countries and
home nations." That agency would then examine the report's
suggestion for "expanding current co-financing mechanisms" and the
establishment of "new mechanisms for 'ca ital pools' for the
developing countries."
Third World.
The thrust of the report is to press for greater financial flows F
rom the developed countries to the -6 world financial situation And
the Cuban represen tative, Even Fontaine-Ortiz emphasized that "the
question of external debt only pointed to the need for the new
international economic order."
The U.S. opposes all CTC involvement in the transnational bank
issue. U.S representative to the Commission Walte r B. Lockwood,
Jr. urged the CTC to "stay away from the issue of international
finance, including the whole debt question because that issue was
so fully handled in other forums such as the IMF and the World Bank
I"Am0NAL =AND- OF AmUNTIJ5IG AND REPORTING The gathering and
dissemination of information on all aspects of the activities of
TNCs has been a major concern of the Centre on Transnational
Corporations since its inception. In its publication International
Accounting and Reporting Issues 1986 Review, the Centre recommends
that TNCs should disclose the amount invested during the. year; the
income derived from the investment; changes in the value of the
investment TNCs should describe their relationships and types of
transactions with other TNCs Auditor s should express their opinion
on whether or not the statements submitted by TNCs complied with
"established standards" and were "true and fair."
The U.S. does not in principle oppose an information system on
TNCs.
Washington warns, however, against colle cting too much information
and #'being swamped." U.S. representative Seymour Rubin, whose
12-year tenure with the Commission ended in 1986 has pointed out a
particular U.S. concern: the violation of business information
confidentiality.
The U.N. representative of a major business organization told The
Heritage Foundation that at times corporations also find it
annoying to have to respond to questionnaires from the CTC
concerning their activities. Not only is it a drain on their
resources , it sometimes appears to be politically motivated. A
recent circular distributed to companies listed as having
subsidiaries in South Africa, for example was ignored by some,
notably Mobil Oil Corporation, because it was obviously a political
exercise Iaw Q uality Data Western nations emphasize the
superfluous nature of the CTC's "information" work. British
representatwe Peter Gent has suggested that "it would be more
sensible for the CTC to have information on information"--in other
words to serve as a guid e for the requesting party to the best
source of facts on a particular company. U.S. representative
Lockwood told The Heritage Foundation that most of the CTC's
information is not of high quality. The representative of a major
pharmaceutical company agrees It is make-work for the CTC 7 The
principal political supporter of the information network
predictably is the Soviet Union. Industrial espionage is high on
the Kremlin's priority list. Western representatives note that the
majority of requests for CTC dat a on corporations come either from
the Soviet bloc or from nongovernmental organizations rather than
from the developing nations for which the data presumably are
intended.
During the period April 1 to December 31, 1983, according to the
CTC, no requests for so-called "company profiles" were received
from developing countries; 16 requests were received from
nongovernmental organizations in developed countries.
The majority of requests--19--came from the Soviet bloc. Denmark's
Peter Hansen current CTC Execu tive Director told The Heritage
Foundation that the CTC has since "discontinued the company
profiles. But U.S. representative to the Commission Lockwood states
that the CTC still engages in compiling information about
companies, whatever the label of the p rogram calls for the
establishment of special files on TNCs that produce or trade in
weapons, which the U.S. and other Western nations strongly resist.
Among other things, these files would fail to account for
government-to-government weapons transfers su c h as those from
Soviet state-owned weapons factories to dozens of Third World
recipients Earempting M&s Weapons Trade. The Soviet Union,
moreover, repeatedly Though it had no authority to work on such a
report, the CTC produced a study in 1985 on TNCs in t he armaments
industry, to which the U.S. strongly objected. Then in 1986, the
CTC report on "Ongoing and Future Research included an annex on
"preliminary findings of a study on TNCs in the production of
armaments and transfer of military technology E/C. 1 0/1986/12 Cm
AND ENvIROIuItmmTAL ISSUES The CTC became involved in environmental
issues after the December 1984 gas leak accident in Bhopal, India.
Indian representative P. Mankad told the Commission this April 8
that TNCs "must assume effective safety re sponsibilities and be
held accountable for injurious consequences arising out of their
operations in a host country Nothing was mentioned, however, about
the responsibilities of the host country.
The CTC's approach to environmental issues is as unbalanced as it
is on other matters. This was noted by the Netherlands'
representative Heleen de Brabander Ypes this sprin She criticized
the CTC for giving only the plaintiffs side in a CTC report
(E$C.10/1987/12 which had been alluded to in an environmental case
b efore U.S. courts. She also noted that in many countries it is
the government that is responsible for environmental problems
Duplicating Efforts The principal U.S. objection to CTC interest in
the environment stems from the duplication of efforts. Lockwoo d
has pointed out that the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) deals
with all aspects of .TNC impact on the environment. In particular,
the issue of chemical accidents and their transboundary effects
will be examined by UNEP in the near future. -8 A key issu e on the
CI'C environment agenda is the preparation of a "List of Products
Harmful to Health and Environment in cooperation with other U.N
agencies. Here, too, a double standard is in operation. The U.S.
consistently has complained about this. Chester Norr i s, Special
Adviser to the U.S. for the 41st General Assembly, objected
''particularly [to] the discriminatory commercial data produced by
the CTC For example, the agricultural chemical known as 2,4-D is
shown in the commercial section of the working draft of the Second
Issue of the Consolidated List of Products Whose Consumption And/or
Sale Have Been Banned Withdrawn, Severely Restricted or Not
Approved by Governments (ST/ESA/192, on p. 434ff as being
manufactured by 47 companies. Yet some of those compani e s notably
E.I. DuPont de Nemours 8z Co Ciba-Geigy AG, and Eli Lilly and Co.
do not in fact make that product. The Dow Chemical Company no
longer makes any of the nine trade names shown in its listing. Yet
the impression is left that these companies still m anufacture
these harmful products. Meanwhile, these December 1986 documents
omit altogether companies known to manufacture the product in East
Germany, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, the Soviet Union,
Romania, the People's Republic of China, Mexico, and others.
The CTC commissioned a study on the transfer of technologj in 19
84. This has just been published, under the btle Transnational
Corporations and Technology Transfer: Eflects cuzd Poky Issues
(ST/CTC/86 The report advises developing countries to devise "an
active strategy for technology transfer and development."
While acknowledging the importance for development of "dynamic
public and private entrepreneurial sectors the ,report continues to
exaggerate the power of TNCs and fails to explain the pr oblems
encountered by TNCs when host countries show insufficient regard
for international patents.
The principal objection of Western nations- to. CTC involvement
with technology transfer again is redundancy. The U.N. Conference
on Trade and Development, for example, has been working on a Code
on Technology Transfer for several years. In the area of
transborder data flow, considerable work has been done by the
International Telecommunications Union. And general trade issues
are the purview of the General A greement on Tariffs and Trade
(GAIT ma IN SOUTH AFRICA AND NAMIBIA resources. Studies,
conferences, resolutions, and reports consistently stress that
Western businesses must take responsibility for ending apartheid.
Yet largely ignored by the CTC is the p ositive impact of the TNCs
on economic and social development in South Africa (E/C.
10/1986/L4/Add. 11).
The CTC has held numerous Public Hearings on the Activities of TNCs
in South Africa and Namibia, where TNCs have been singled out by
name for criticism . Gora Ebrahim, representative of the
Pan-Africanist Congress of Azania, a pro-Mbst terrorist
organization, speaking at the Public Hearings on the Activities The
campaign against South Africa has claimed a vast amount of the CTCs
-9 of TNCs in South Afric a and Namibia held in New York in
September 1985 accused Citibank and Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. of
"rescuing the Pretoria government in time of crisis."
The General Motors Corporation is one of several Western companies
Singled out in a report by the U.N. Secretary-General on the
responsibility of the countries of ownership for alleged TNC
violations of U.N. resolutions in South Africa document
E/C.10/1987/8 General Motors countered by producing a document on
the subject, which the U.S. presented to the CT C . It solidly
refuted ,the suggestion in the report that the management of the
General Motors' facility had been aided by the South African police
THE CE'S ANTIGROWTH BIAS The CTC regularly discusses and produces
studies about TNCs and international econom i c relations. The
premise of this work was clear as early as 1974 in the report on
"The Impact of Multinational Corporations on Development and on
International Relations This report, which defined the CTC's
purpose, states that "it is necessary for host d e veloping
countries to formulate their development strategies clearly in
order to direct the investments of multinational corporations in a
way that is consistent with their national goals and policies,
including income distribution, labor conditions, indu strialization
or balance of payments."
Nowhere is it sueested that host countries should shift their
national policies away from income redistribution toward private
sector development. According to Seymour Rubin, former U.S.
representative to the Commissi on on Transnationals and currently
Professor of Law at American University, the CTC is not interested
in promoting free enterprise Erroneous Conctusion. Since the
arrival of Peter 'Hansen .of Denmark as (JTC Director in 1985,
notes Rubin, the (JTC has bec o me particularly careful not to
antagonize the U.S. The CTC's latest report on TNCs and
international economic relabons (E/C.10/1087/2) recognizes the
importance of host country policies in encouraging or discouraging
investment. The report even notes that creating "an improved
investment climate" might attract TNCs. But instead of endorsing
this, let alone actively promoting the virtue of free enterprise,
the report erroneously concludes that "the evidence to date gives
no indication of an overall positive response to the improved
investment climate that developing countries have been trying to
foster."
The fact is that almost all the evidence confirms that Third World
policy changes can improve their economies dramatically. Instead of
admitting this, the r eport blames TNCs for "heightened oligopoly"
and for a trend toward the domination of markets for certain
certain products by some handful of corporations By contrast,, the
latest World Development Report of the World Bank 10 documents the
fact that free trade policies boost economic growth in the Third
World.3 Impeding Economic Development One of the most vivid
examples of the CTC's flawed approach to development is the Code of
Conduct for Transnationals.
This Code does nothing for development. Rather, it reinforces the
myth that regulation will help Third World nations-and if possible,
mandatory regulation.
Unfortunately, the U.N. system plays into the hands of the more
radical developing nations. As Ambassador Keyes told Congress in
May in the bloc politics of the U.N. system moderate developing
countries have been unwilling to break ranks with the more ext reme
[developing countries] and the communist states He therefore sees
little prospect for early agreement on the Code.
Murray Weidenbaum has attacked the CTC's attempt to regulate
business Unlike the existing body of domestic regulation says
Weidenbaum th is new burst of international regulation is not
primarily motivated by a desire to improve business performance.
Rather, the current style of rule-making is aimed at more political
objectives, notably the redistribution of economic power Weidenbaum
consid e rs the CTC's Code of Conduct for Transnationals, in
particular, to be the most dangerous of the proposals or actions by
international. agencies in connection with regulating the
day-to-day operations of private companies CONCLUSION A basic
premise of the Centre on Transnational Corporations is that an
antagonistic relationship exists between transnational corporations
and the Third World. Implicit in this premise is the proposition
that TNCs must be regulated.
Rather than providing strong pro-growth advice to developing
countries, the CTC spends much of its time blarmng TNCs for South
Africa's system of apartheid, for poverty in the Third World, for
environmental problems, and for not investing enough in developing
countries.
The CTC has been trying for more than a decade to draft a Code of
Conduct for TNCs, but no consensus has been reached, even on the
definition of TNCs.
There is also no agreement on whether the Code should be voluntary
or mandatory.
Consequently, the U.S. has drastically reduced its participation in
the Centre's activities.
The CTC also is involved in an openly anti-Western "Harmful
Products List which singles out companies' presumably producing
such products. The list is inaccurate, and one-sided: it completely
ignores products from the Eastern bloc or the Third World.
Ending US Participation. The "information" system the CTC is
attempting to gather on TNCs, moreover, is not only in most cases
out of date and incomplete but often a burden, even a political
nuisance, to Western compan ies. The U.N. is wasting its money on
such a system 3. Michael Prow, "Neutral Trade Regimes Boost
Economic Growth Financial Times, July 1, 1987 11 Most important,
however, the (TC fails to encourage developing countries to pursue
the policies that will le a d to reater economic success. Instead,
it is biased original mandate for the U.S. to cease participation
in the CTC altogether. It is time to focus attention on the U.N.'s
anti-growth economic agenda and to repudiate its anti Western bias
as well as its r egulatory zeal m favor of regulating the
activities o f Western companies, in line with the CTC's The U.S.
already has reduced its role in the CTC. The time now has come
Juliana Geran Pilon Ph.Dr Senior Policy Analyst