August 20, 2013
By Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
“Are you now, or have you ever been, a conservative?”
No, that’s not how Internal Revenue Service officials worded it when they demanded reams of detailed information about various right-leaning groups applying for tax-exempt status over the past few years. But they might as well have. As more details emerge about this scandal, the more it sounds like a modern-day witch hunt.
That hunt began shortly after the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Unhappy that the highest court in the land had vastly eased restrictions on independent political speech, certain government officials began to give greater scrutiny to groups whose political views were at odds with the current administration.
According to retiring IRS lawyer Carter C. Hull, this was no accident. In testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, he said that such groups were subjected to what House documents call “an uncommon multilayer review” that involved a top adviser to Lois Lerner, the former head of the IRS‘ tax-exempt division, as well as the chief counsel’s office, led by presidential appointee William J. Wilkins.
Who was targeted? Groups with names that included “Tea Party,” “patriots” or “9/12” in their names. Groups “worried about government spending, debt or taxes, and even ones that lobbied to ‘make America a better place to live,’” The Wall Street Journal said. Another red flag, according to Fox News: doing any “education on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.” Scary, subversive documents, those.
What did the IRS want to know about such groups when they applied for tax-exempt status? The “training materials” they were distributing. The political affiliation of any group mentors. The positions they took on a range of issues. The material their members were reading. The content they posted on social-networking websites. Copies of their communications with legislators. The names of any student members, many of whom were minors. And more.
The Coalition for Life of Iowa got this request: “Please explain how all of your activities, including the prayer meetings held outside of Planned Parenthood, are considered educational as defined under 501(c)(3). … Please explain in detail the activities at these prayer meetings. Also, please provide the percentage of time your group spends on prayer groups as compared with other activities of the organization.” At least they said “please.”
A Tea Party group in Ohio was hit with 35 detailed questions, such as: “Provide a listing of all your past activities. Indicate the percentage of your time spent conducting the activity (total of all activities should equal 100 percent) and the percentage of your funds spent conducting the activity (total of all activities should equal 100 percent).”
The IRS was essentially playing a waiting game. It’s hard for any group formed to advocate a particular point of view to raise money or conduct any normal business while its tax status is in doubt, and that’s what these groups faced: an indefinite delay as they coped with burdensome documentation requests.
Understandably, some gave up. Dealing with the IRS “was frightening, and that’s why I shut it down,” Jennifer Stefano of Pennsylvania told ABC News of her plans to start a Tea Party group.
It wasn’t just the IRS. The latest round of emails released by congressional investigators shows that it took Ms. Lerner all of nine minutes to tell agency attorneys to share information the Federal Election Commission requested about one organization.
Singling out any groups for such abuse should concern all Americans, no matter what their political views. The idea that the levers of government can be pulled at will to harass one’s ideological opponents is “intolerable and inexcusable,” as President Obama initially said of the IRS‘ actions. “Regardless of how this conduct was allowed to take place, the bottom line is, it was wrong.”
He was right, even though he has lately been calling it a “phony” scandal. Congress and the FBI are investigating the matter. Will they expose the whole truth — and in a timely fashion?
-Ed Feulner is founder of the Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
First appeared in The Washington Times.
Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman of the Asian Studies Center, and Chung Ju-yung Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute,
with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in
February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free
enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national
defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973