October 25, 2013
By Ariel Cohen, Ph.D.
On October 25, it will be ten years since a Russian SWAT team arrested oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky in a Siberian airport. It was a watershed moment for Russia, defining the Putin era as one in which the Russian oligarchs were subjugated to the Kremlin.
Prior to Khodorkovsky’s arrest, the Kremlin had limited itself to deposing media oligarchs. It had, for example, forced Vladimir Gusinsky and the late Boris Berezovsky to give the state their politically critical assets in and allowed them to leave the country. But Khodorkovsky was different. Three years after ensconcing themselves in the Kremlin, the new masters decided they wanted it all: money and power. And on Oct. 25, 2003, they took it. Because they could.
Khodorkovsky was a founder of Yukos, the most modern energy company in Russia. He had enriched the industry by importing Western technology, management, accounting—even international managers—for the Yukos building and its board.
Yukos shares skyrocketed after the company became transparent through the introduction of Western accounting procedures. Exxon and Chevron raced to buy half of the company – supposedly, with the Kremlin’s blessing. In 2003, Yukos was in the process of merging with Sibneft—a deal that would have created the world’s largest publicly traded oil company in terms of reserve barrels.
And then it all fell apart. Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his partner Platon Lebedev were arrested in 2003. In 2005 they were sentenced to eight years in prison for tax evasion. The prison term was extended to 14 years after a second sentence (imposed in 2010) for “stealing” all the oil produced by their company – even though that oil had been exported through the state-run pipeline company Transneft.
If no additional criminal case is opened against Khodorkovsky (talk about triple jeopardy), he may be released next August. Optimists estimate the chances of his release to be 50-50.
If the rule of law prevailed in Russia, both Khodorkovsky trials would have ended in acquittal. Reportedly, the judges’ and investigators’ families were threatened with harm unless guilty verdicts were handed down. As in the 1930s, witnesses or former colleagues were badly beaten or denied medical care for AIDS if they refused to testify against their former boss.
And when political powers intervene, there are no hopes for a fair trial in Russia. Not for Khodorkovsky, and not for tens of thousands of others. Nowadays, Russian courts acquit less than one percent of all defendants brought to the dock. Even under Stalin, the numbers were higher! And herein lies Russia’s tragedy of the twenty-first century.
Although Khodorkovsky was arrested on charges of tax evasion, he was guilty of something else entirely. His real “crime” was the desire to be politically independent of the Kremlin kleptocracy. As for the taxes, Yukos most certainly did pay them, as documented by PricewaterHouseCooper, one of the world’s largest audit firms. And the Russian tax service officially thanked Khodorkovsky for his tax payments – six months before his arrest.
Lawless courts had long been a bane of Russia --especially its businesspeople. But with Khodorkovsky’s arrest in 2003, the state became the biggest corporate raider of all. Since then, both political expression and the business climate in Russia have been stifled. The Khodorkovsky verdict locked in the Russian court system as a tool of political suppression—just as it was under the czars and the commissars.
Khodorkovsky’s jail sentence has become a tragic mistake for Russia. It has damaged the country’s image as well as its business climate. The two consecutive prison terms—a common practice under Stalin—resembles a vendetta more than a well-thought-through carriage of justice.
Had the disgraced oligarch followed the example of his colleagues and fled Russia, he would be enjoying a lavish lifestyle—and most probably be forgotten, too. But Khodorkovsky, knowing what the Kremlin had in store for him, opted to stand up to his foes in an unfair trial.
It was a very Russian thing to do – to martyr himself. “I want to be a free man in a free country,” Khodorkovsky said. He was naïve.
By jailing Khodorkovsky, the Russian authorities made him an historic figure. Today, he symbolizes the fight against corruption and graft and and a harsh and unfair judicial system. His fate highlights the collapse of the rule of law. His jail term has cost the country tens of billions of investment dollars. The sight of an oligarch-turned-political-prisoner sewing mittens in a prison camp told the world a lot about a country that treats one of its most talented sons like this.
Today, Amnesty International considers Khodorkovsky a prisoner of conscience; others compare him to Nelson Mandela. The European parliament passes resolutions in his cause, and composers dedicate symphonies to him.
In the ten years since his imprisonment began, the number of Russians who support Khodorkovsky’s early release has increased. They outnumber those who oppose his release two to one (33% versus 16%). Khodorkovky has been awarded the prestigious Lech Walesa prize for “promoting civil society values”.
None of this, of course, will compensate Khodorkovsky for eleven years of separation from his family, with no possibility of seeing his elderly and sick parents, far from his grown-up children and grandchildren. However, nothing teaches one about life in Russia like prison does. Today, Khodorkovsky is doubtless both wiser and humbler than he was in 2003.
The Russian authorities need to release Khodorkovsky -- in the interest of their country. They cannot hope for modernization and economic development without having an independent judiciary.
Arrests of political opponents and expropriation of large assets not only cast doubt on the Kremlin’s commitment to democratic values (there are few illusions here), but they also discredit Russian legal and judicial institutions. That determines future investments worth tens and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Keeping Khodorkovsky in jail also leads to unnecessary tensions in the relations with the West.
Khodorkovsky is but one in a long line of famous Russian political prisoners—among them three Nobel winners: physicist Andrey Sakharov, writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and the poet Joseph Brodsky. “They [the Russian authorities] have written his biography”, to use the words of Anna Akhmatova about Brodsky.
One can but wonder why the Russian authorities keep repeating the same mistake.
- Ariel Cohen is Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy Policy at the Heritage Foundation.
Originally appeared in the National Interest
Ariel Cohen, Ph.D.
Visiting Fellow in Russian and Eurasian Studies and International Energy Policy in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign and National Security Policy, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973