October 21, 2013
By Edwin Meese III
In the course of his ongoing crusade for Medicaid expansion, Ohio governor John Kasich has suggested that Ronald Reagan, Saint Peter, and God Himself all would support his plan to accept Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.
While we do not have special insight into the mind of the Almighty or His divine agents, we do know something about Ronald Reagan. Expanding a failing, big-government program that reduces flexibility for the states and traps generations of Americans in dependency is not consistent with the kind of conservative solutions that Reagan sought during his terms as governor of California and president of the United States.
Governor Kasich bases his argument that he is doing what Reagan would have done on the fact that Reagan expanded Medicaid when he was president. Rather than furthering Kasich’s case, however, Reagan’s actions shed light on precisely why it is that the Obama plan embraced by Kasich is so antithetical to the policies that Reagan promoted.
Kasich first points out that in 1986, Reagan signed a bill that gave states the option of participating in a program to add poor children and pregnant women to Medicaid. Aside from offering a genuine choice to the states (as opposed to the economic coercion of Obamacare), this expansion had a factor missing from the current debate: abortion.
In an era when there were perpetual fights over using public funds for abortion, the expansion assured that pregnant women would not be financially worse off carrying their children to term than they would be if they chose to have an abortion. And the policy worked. A study from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute found that abortions decreased and births increased following the expanded coverage in sampled states.
By contrast, Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion does nothing to help pregnant women and children. Indeed, as Ohio argued in court, Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion “transformed” the basic nature of the Medicaid program from one that gave states flexibility and applied coverage to the categorically vulnerable like pregnant women and children into a general entitlement based solely on income.
Given this shift, and the poor performance of the Medicaid program in general, it is not surprising that multiple prominent pro-life leaders in Ohio oppose Kasich’s plan for Medicaid expansion.
Kasich then points to the fact that Reagan permitted children who were restricted to receiving Medicaid-funded care in hospitals to be eligible for that care at home as well. It is a stretch to characterize this as a program “expansion” — it was more of a correction.
Reagan cut through irrational federal regulations to allow children to live with their parents, where they could receive care that would cost the taxpayer one-sixth as much as institutional care. By contrast, Obamacare has added thousands of pages of bureaucratic regulations and will cost the federal government untold billions.
But this was not the only Medicaid regulation that Reagan sought to eliminate. His policy from the beginning was to seek repeal of federal Medicaid regulations and statutory mandates other than those related to cost controls. He sought to give the states flexibility in running the program and proposed converting Medicaid into a block-grant program.
Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion, by contrast, sets a one-size-fits-all policy. States are forced to ask permission, which has been preemptively denied, to provide for personal responsibility, work requirements, or co-pays or to modify the coverage criteria. Successful state programs have been rejected or have been given very short renewals.
The political reality in which Reagan worked was with a House dominated by Speaker Tip O’Neill and Representative Henry Waxman, which limited Reagan’s ability to succeed in broader reforms. By contrast, Governor Kasich does not have a liberal legislature that must be persuaded of the notion that it’s folly to expand a failing federal program. Rather, Kasich has spent tremendous capital attempting to convince the Republican majorities in both the Ohio House and Senate that massively expanding the Medicaid program is the right thing to do.
When Ohio’s legislature rejected the expansion, Governor Kasich took the extraordinary step of entering into an agreement with the federal government to expand anyway, threatening to bankrupt the state’s Medicaid program if a special appropriations board did not ratify his decision.
Yes, Reagan worked with both parties to change the way Medicaid was run. But he did so with certain principles held true. Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion is inconsistent with those principles.
While imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, it does a disservice to the memory of Ronald Reagan to cloak in his mantle failing programs that weaken the states and increase government dependency.
- Edwin Meese III served as chief of staff to Governor Reagan and as counselor to President Reagan prior to being confirmed as the 75th attorney general of the United States.
Originally appeared in National Review Online
Edwin Meese III
Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow Emeritus
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2015, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973