June 19, 2012
By Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
We all know how the Obama administration likes to portray the auto bailout: A generous infusion of money enabled the government to save General Motors and Chrysler. Jobs that otherwise would have disappeared were rescued by this taxpayer-funded largesse. It was expensive, but we had no choice.
The reality is far less uplifting: Administration officials could have ensured that the bailout didn’t cost you and me a dime. All they had to do was require the United Auto Workers to accept standard bankruptcy concessions. Instead, the UAW got special treatment.
Subsidizing the UAW’s above-market pay and benefits was expensive. The union workers at GM and are among the highest-paid workers in the country. About $26.5 billion of what the government paid for the bailout went toward making sure these workers could continue to enjoy compensation that many Americans can only dream about. As labor expert James Sherk puts it, “The auto bailout was actually a UAW bailout.”
For perspective, $26.5 billion is more than what we spend on foreign aid each year.
By contrast, look what Ford did. It mortgaged its assets and began restructuring in 2007 (a year before the housing market caved in), so it didn’t need a bailout. GM and Chrysler, however, continued business as usual. So when consumers began cutting their spending, both automakers ran out of money.
At that point, they should have declared bankruptcy, restructured and done what was necessary to emerge as stronger and more profitable. Instead, they went to Washington with their hands out. The George W. Bush administration lent them enough from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to keep them going for a few months. Then the Obama administration forced them to go into bankruptcy as a condition for receiving taxpayer funds.
The result was what some lampooned as “Government Motors.” Both companies sold their assets to the new GM and Chrysler, which by then were partially owned by the government. Since then, as the companies have recovered, the government has been selling off its shares - at a loss. Much of the bailout will never be repaid.
All together, taxpayers stand to lose $23 billion. That amount would be zero, however, if union compensation weren’t so high.
To see why, consider the average hourly wages for workers at the Big Three automakers. At GM, workers were making $70.51 per hour (pre-bankruptcy). At Ford, it was $73.26; at Chrysler, $75.86. Compare that to the hourly wages for workers at other car companies: Toyota ($47.60), Honda ($42.95) and Nissan ($41.97).
Why are Detroit’s labor costs so much higher? The UAW. Members get generous retirement and health care benefits. They can collect pensions in their 50s, and retirees get full health coverage until they become eligible for Medicare. Even then, they enjoy additional coverage to complement the government program. Sounds great - if it’s affordable.
The average Medicare recipient pays $4,200 out of pocket annually, but for UAW retirees, it’s just $285.
The UAW made some large concessions, but for new hires only. There were a few changes for existing UAW members, but nothing major - changing overtime calculations, for example, and a bit less vacation pay. Their benefit funds were treated better than other creditors were, even though bankruptcy law calls for creditors to be treated equally.
“We should have asked the UAW to do a bit more,” President Obama’s “car czar,” Stephen Rattner, has admitted. “We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in pay.”
So, fellow taxpayers, the burden falls to us. We’re making it possible for two companies that refused to declare bankruptcy and restructure, as Ford did, to pay their union workers the same high rate that helped get them into trouble in the first place.
Remember that the next time you hear how the “auto bailout” saved jobs. In reality, it saved the UAW from its own folly - and stuck us with the bill.
Ed Feulner is president of The Heritage Foundation.
This article first appeared on WashingtonTimes.com
Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman of the Asian Studies Center, and Chung Ju-yung Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2015, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973