March 21, 2012
By Mike Gonzalez
Pope Benedict XVI’s trip to Cuba, later this month had the potential to greatly advance the cause of human freedom, which is, after all, the continuation of Jesus Christ’s work on this earth.
During this visit the pope could meet publicly with dissidents to offer them a measure of protection from their tormentors. He could speak clearly and loudly about their dignity as human beings. He could point out that they shouldn’t be thrown in dungeons for speaking freely, or accosted in the street by government mobs, especially when they are on their way to Mass.
Alas and inexplicably, all of this potential may be thwarted, as the hierarchy of the Church in Cuba has let it be known that the pope has no time to meet with dissidents because his schedule is too tight. Adding insult to injury, Vatican spokesman Rev. Federico Lombardi said that if Cuba’s ailing dictator Fidel Castro wants a personal meeting, “the pope will be available.”
It didn’t take long for Fidel’s little brother and designated successor, President Raul Castro, to recognize that he had a free hand. His security forces arrested dozens of dissidents Tuesday, ahead of the pope’s visit. There are reports today they have been released but told to stay away from Mass or make any attempts to see the pope.
The decision by the Church hierarchy in Cuba to abandon the dissidents and show obeisance to the Castros is a grave mistake, perhaps even a shameful one.
Even if the pope’s mission to Cuba is entirely about gaining adherents to the Church and deepening the belief of those already Catholic, this snub to those who are the future of Cuba and obsequiousness to dying dictators is sure to backfire and make young Cubans even more skeptical of the faith.
Which would be a shame, as the history of the Roman Catholic Church in Cuba has always been one of protection of the people against the depredations or neglect of their leaders. From Fray Bartolome de las Casas, who waged a successful campaign on behalf of the Indians at the court in Spain in the early 1500s, to Father Evelino Compostela, who advocated for bringing more comfort to ranchers living isolated lives in western Cuba at the turn of the 18th century, to Father Felix Varela, who argued for independence from Spain and the abolition of slavery in the 1800s.
The present head of the Cuban Catholic Curch, Cardinal Jaime Ortega, falls far, far short of his predecessors’ example. Unfortunately, it seems that Pope Benedict has been taking advice from his man in Havana.
Cardinal Ortega, as The Washington Post said Tuesday in a rightly hard-hitting editorial, “has become a de facto partner of Raul Castro, meeting with him regularly and encouraging his limited reforms.”
The cardinal hit a new low last week when he asked authorities to enter a church in Havana to dislodge a group of dissidents who had sought peaceful sanctuary there. It was Cardinal Ortega, doubtless, who advised Pope Benedict not to meet with the dissidents.
The dissidents who have asked to meet with the Pontiff, known as "Las Damas de Blanco" aka "the Ladies in White," are very deserving of being granted an audience with the head of their church. They are a group of defenseless women, mostly the wives and mothers of political prisoners, who bravely walk take their opposition message to the streets of Cuba, only to be met with violence by government goons.
The Castros, as all communists, have always been enemies of religion, especially the Catholic Church. For a very long time after the Revolution Cuba was officially atheist.
I remember well, as an altar boy in Mass in Havana, when rocks would come flying in from the streets and land in the middle of church, shaking all parishioners. I also remember taunts from teachers and the principal because I went to church every Sunday. The enmity shown by authorities to the church only deepened my family’s faith. It made us better Catholics.
Standing up to dictators in extremely difficult circumstances is always difficult, and one needs courage. Cubans have practically no freedoms or civil rights, and has one third the Internet penetration of Haiti. The Heritage Foundation will team up with Google Ideas Wednesday on a panel on this issue, to be addressed by Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is, like me, also of Cuban descent.
But Cardinal Ortega should be able to find strength and courage in thinking that that the people of Cuba need his protection.
As for the pope, it may be too late by now for him to reconsider what is becoming a stained visit to Cuba, but it’s not too late to reverse a bad decision and meet with Cuba’s dissidents.
is Vice President of Communications at The Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in FOXNews.com
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973