October 6, 2010
By Walter Lohman and Rupert Hammond-Chambers
China's recent provocative behavior has created tension with many of its neighbors, from Southeast Asia and Japan to South Korea.
But tension between China and Taiwan is at an all-time low.
The Obama administration seems to consider the calm an opportunity to focus on the more pressing foreign policy problems in East Asia, the Middle East and elsewhere. A lack of initiative from Washington has left U.S.-Taiwan relations essentially on autopilot. It's a convenient response — but extremely shortsighted.
The key to long-term stability — across the Strait and throughout the Asia Pacific — is a strong, free, prosperous and democratic Taiwan able to hold its own in its dealings with China. This is possible only in the context of a healthy, action-oriented U.S.-Taiwan relationship. And this time of relatively peace and stability across the Strait is the perfect time to achieve it.
Beijing and Taipei recently inked a historic Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). In signing the pact, Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou's stated goal was opening avenues for similar agreements with other trading partners.
His strategy appears to be bearing fruit. Singapore and Taiwan recently announced agreement to "explore the feasibility of an economic cooperation agreement." The Philippines made a similar announcement.
The devil is in the details of any such agreements and the way in which Chinese diplomatic interests are accommodated. Still, this is welcome news.
Meanwhile, the U.S. has failed to show leadership with a Taiwan Free Trade Agreement (FTA) of its own. Indeed, under the current administration, we have no overall trade policy. A U.S.-Taiwan trade pact would benefit both economies and anchor Taiwan more securely in the international economic order. Instead, we have let China jump ahead with ECFA, and now others may be poised to pass the U.S. as well.
The administration must articulate a long-term vision for the region that includes an integral role for Taiwan and support it with real action.
First, the U.S. must start leading on free trade by initiating a U.S.-Taiwan FTA. Provided that the U.S. and Korea do not turn their free trade agreement (KORUS) into a managed trade agreement, President Obama's intention to move it forward with Korea is a good thing.
However, KORUS makes a U.S.-Taiwan FTA all the more imperative, since KORUS would give South Korean companies an advantage over their Taiwanese competitors.
It is good to see the administration resetting the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) talks with Taiwan. The U.S. and Taiwan have not met for TIFA talks in three years.
That's because the U.S. was using the talks as leverage on disputed issues, like Taiwan's problems with American beef imports, rather than using them to find solutions. We shouldn't let this sort of thinking cause the talks to lapse again. We can't advance the economic relationship if we're not talking.
Second, the U.S. should sell Taiwan the F-16C/D fighters it has requested and support the upgrade of its existing F-16A/Bs. Numerous reports from both government and private sources document the growing military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait.
This sale is the single most important thing the U.S. can do to dent the imbalance in forces vis a vis China.
It's also an essential material demonstration of U.S. support for Taiwan at a time when the Ma administration may start to engage China on thornier matters.
Third, the U.S. and Taiwan should institutionalize an annual two-plus-two strategic dialogue between high-level State and Defense Department officials and their counterparts from Taiwan. Such a dialogue should accompany a return to the arms sales process that ended in 2001.
This will limit the space for the sort of political games recently played with America's security commitment to Taiwan and help ensure that important decisions on arms sales are made in a timely manner.
While senior American officials today meet periodically with their Taiwan colleagues, the lack of transparency allows for rhetorical assurances of good faith by the U.S. unmet by material demonstrations of action.
Fourth, we should establish a broad mix of regular government visits between Taiwan and the U.S. It has been more than 10 years since a U.S. Cabinet officer visited Taiwan. The Obama administration has entertained the possibility of Secretary of Veteran Affairs Eric Shinseki visiting Taipei.
The energy and commerce secretaries or the U.S. trade representative should visit Taiwan. Cabinet-level contact should be backed by an end to the prohibition on American flag and general officer visits to Taipei, lifting the bar on Taiwan's ministers of defense and foreign affairs visits to Washington, and letting Taiwan's officials visit the State Department for consultations.
Now is the time to push for stronger relations with Taiwan. If we don't, the U.S. may well wake up one day to find itself unable to influence events in the Taiwan Strait and, ultimately, in the broader Asia-Pacific region.
Walter Lohman is director of the Heritage Foundation's Asian Studies Center.
First appeared in The Investor's Business Daily
Director, Asian Studies Center
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973