On the evening of November 4, a newly elected President said,
"This is our time -- to put our people back to work and open doors
of opportunity for our kids." Today's youth may look back at those
words and wonder why the doors remained closed.
In his first 100 days, President Barack Obama has undermined
America's future prosperity, putting us in danger of breaking one
of our country's fundamental promises: to leave America better for
the next generation.
Military Supremacy No More
defense Secretary Robert Gates unveiled the administration's
proposed defense budget by saying his "decisions have been almost
exclusively influenced by factors other than simply finding a way
to balance the books or fit under the top line."
Gates tried to preempt critics, adding, "Some will say I am too
focused on the wars we are in and not enough on future threats." He
anticipated such criticisms because his formulations were indeed
budget driven and, as a result, focused on the near term.
As defense expert and former Sen. Jim Talent observed, Gates
"referred to the 'limited tax dollars' the department will have
available in the future" and did not mention that the military "is
facing a shortfall of at least $50 billion per year in the
modernization funding that is absolutely necessary to maintain
America's military predominance."
How else could Gates defend ending the F-22 program that is
designed to ensure technological advances by Russia and China do
not jeopardize our air superiority? The administration's blueprint
threatens to saddle our children with a deteriorated and hollow
force that may not be capable of winning future wars. As Gates'
predecessor Donald Rumsfeld infamously said, "You go to war with
the Army you have." This budget will not give the next generation
the military it will want or need.
During the past eight years, federal education funding increased
58% faster than inflation. Yet President Obama believes "too many
of our schools do not prepare" our children to compete in the
"global economy." He is right, but his solution -- to double down
on the spending -- is wrong.
Even worse, he intends to eliminate one federal program that is
helping disadvantaged children. The D.C. Opportunity Scholarship
program, which costs only $14 million annually, allows 1,700
children to escape the nation's worst public school system. One
could understand the President's decision if the program was
ineffective. After all, he said his administration would "use only
one test when deciding what ideas to support with [our] precious
tax dollars: It's not whether an idea is liberal or conservative,
but whether it works."
However, if that is the metric, he should be expanding the
program. A recent administration report found students who used the
scholarships were far ahead of their peers in reading and that
education gap accelerated over time. Now, children stuck in
dangerous, underperforming schools may never have a chance to break
out of that environment and compete in the global economy.
Universally Poor Health Care
In his address to Congress, President Obama said, "Already,
we've done more to advance the cause of health-care reform in the
last 30 days than we've done in the last decade." He was touting
the dramatic expansion of SCHIP, which is a recipe for low-quality
care for many children. But two other policies threaten to make
First, the administration is seeking to repeal federal
"conscience clause" regulations, which ensure that health-care
providers are not forced to perform procedures (i.e. abortion) that
conflict with their moral or religious beliefs. Repealing those
regulations would jeopardize legal protections for doctors who
perform abortions, faith-based hospitals that do not allow such
procedures and pharmacists who are morally opposed to the
"morning-after" pill. This violation of freedom would have dire
consequences for our already struggling health system, including
reduced access to care.
Second, the administration is pushing for Comparative
Effectiveness Research (CER) to be primarily organized by the
government. The type of information collected by CER could
eventually be used inappropriately if a "Federal Health Board" was
created to decide which types of treatment would be available to
whom and when. Most Americans, and many people who are on
government-run health care, are skeptical that unaccountable and
unreachable government bureaucrats can improve the quality of their
Expensive, Unreliable Energy
The President talks fondly of what he calls a "new energy
economy," describing it as not "just a challenge to meet, [but] an
opportunity to seize." To "truly transform our economy," he says,
"we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable
kind of energy."
How do politicians make expensive, unreliable energy profitable?
They can tax cheap profitable sources, subsidize unreliable
sources, mandate the use of expensive sources, or all of the above.
President Obama's quest to replace affordable energy with expensive
energy would, by definition, raise the cost of electricity in
The President is intent on creating his own market with a system
that taxes CO2 emissions, commonly referred to as a cap-and-trade
program. Not only would this tax on energy production raise
electric bills, but it would further deteriorate the nation's
manufacturing capacity and undermine our global economic standing.
High energy prices, a weakened economy, dramatic job loss and an
economic disadvantage on the world market is not a recipe for our
Generational Theft Through debt
"There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our
children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not
pass on to them a debt they cannot pay." President Obama said this
in his first address to Congress, after signing a $787 billion
stimulus bill hat could cost the American people more than $3.27
trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The President's budget plan, when combined with the stimulus,
could result in the doubling of our public debt over the next
decade. At that level, as a percentage of GDP, the debt burden we
are leaving our children would approach the aftermath of World War
II. If we want our children to be the next "Greatest Generation,"
we need to allow them to succeed, not force them to swallow a
McMansion-sized mortgage before they graduate from high school.
President Obama also told Congress that "We have lived through
an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term
prosperity." He appears to be repeating and compounding those
mistakes. If he continues to implement his agenda, our children
will inherit a country much different than the one we or our
parents knew. Crippling debt, expensive and scarce energy, no
alternatives to poor public education and health care, and a
weakened military does not open doors, it closes them.
Dan Holler is deputy director of U.S. Senate Relations at The
First Appeared in Human Events
On the evening of November 4, a newly elected President said, "This is our time -- to put our people back to work and open doors of opportunity for our kids." Today's youth may look back at those words and wonder why the doors remained closed.
Entitlements, Taxes & Spending Initiative of the Leadership for America Campaign
Senate Relations Deputy
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam(R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973