March 24, 2009
By Brian M. Riedl
Last fall, presidential candidate Barack Obama promised
revolutionary change in Washington.
Too bad his budget policies have offered merely more of the
The president promised a "net spending cut." Then he signed a
massive so-called "stimulus" bill that critics on the left and
right agreed was deeply flawed, and that will dump $9,400 per
household of new debt into the laps of our children and
Obama also pledged to "slash earmarks to no greater than 1994
levels" of 1,318. Then he signed an omnibus spending bill with
9,287 earmarks -- the second most in American history, including
money for tattoo removal, a Buffalo Bill museum, and a Totally Teen
The president promised his budgets would confront the "hard
choices" that President Bush had avoided by relying on budget
deficits. Then he offered a budget that would create as much
government debt as every other president from George Washington to
George W. Bush -- combined.
President Obama's speeches loudly denounce Bush policies. Yet
his budget doubles down on them. President Bush's spending spree
expanded government by $700 billion.
President Obama's budget would expand government by $1 trillion
(not even counting the stimulus).
President Bush began a seemingly endless series of financial
bailouts. President Obama's budget would accelerate those
President Bush created an expensive Medicare drug entitlement
and began a historic education spending surge. President Obama's
budget creates a $634 billion health care reserve fund and would
nearly double federal education funds.
President Bush's budgets included unrealistic assumptions and
gimmicks. President Obama's budget unrealistically assumes an
economic boom will begin next January.
President Bush oversaw budget deficits between $300 billion and
$400 billion while fighting a war. Even after (assumed) peace and
prosperity, President Obama would run permanent deficits between
$500 billion and $700 billion.
Where are the hard choices? Where is the new direction?
President Obama's only real divergence is his proposal to raise
taxes steeply. Yet all these tax increases would go toward
expanding government. None would reduce budget deficits even back
to President Bush's levels.
Over 10 years, President Obama would raise taxes by an average
$300,000 apiece for the 3.2 million individuals and small
businesses with the highest incomes. With the economy already in
recession, this is downright reckless; President Hoover's tax
increases, after all, helped turn a recession into the Great
Depression. And delaying these tax increases until 2011 won't stop
forward-looking businesses from immediately scaling back any
investment and hiring plans in anticipation of the painful tax
Everyone else's taxes would rise, too. Despite his promise that
"if your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see
your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime,"
the president has proposed an (at least) $646 billion cap-and-trade
energy tax. This would immediately be passed onto all consumers at
a cost that could average anywhere from $650 to $2,000 per
Overall, Washington spent $24,000 per household before the
recession. The president's budget would increase real annual
spending to $32,000 per household by 2019 - and that assumes he
proposes no additional government expansions.
Anyone who believes all these costs can be paid by the
wealthiest 2 percent of taxpayers is dreaming. We'll all be paying
this tab for decades.
And after all the talk about confronting "hard choices,"
President Obama's budget offers no solution to the coming cost of
paying Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits to 77
million retiring baby boomers. Absent reform, those costs could
push income tax rates to over 60 percent for the middle class-not
even counting the tax increases to fund the president's new
The president's proposals haven't restored the stock market's
confidence. The Dow Jones Industrial Average -- which had climbed
from November's 7,500 trough back to 9,000 by New Year's Day - has
already plummeted by nearly 25 percent this year. And Obama's call
to raise investment taxes will further depress the market.
All in all, it's a blueprint for higher taxes, lower incomes and
declining retirement funds.
The biggest winners are Washington lobbyists, one of whom
gleefully declared the president's budget "is like Christmas" for
The biggest losers are those not yet old enough to vote.
President Bush had already dumped $25,000 per household of new debt
into their laps.
President Obama plans to add an additional $48,000 per household
to their tab. Is that the kind of "change" America voted for?
Riedl is Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary
Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies
at The Heritage Foundation.
First Appeared in McClatchy
Last fall, presidential candidate Barack Obama promised revolutionary change in Washington.
Entitlements, Taxes & Spending Initiative of the Leadership for America Campaign
Brian M. Riedl
Grover Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973