For the last 35 years, educators and analysts at The Heritage
Foundation have been intimately involved in the nation's great
public policy debates. In all that time, we have never encountered
legislation with such far-reaching and revolutionary policy
implications as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
currently before Congress. And never have we seen a bill more
cloaked in secrecy or more withdrawn from open public exposure and
honest debate.
In addition to being the single most expensive bill ever
proposed, this measure calls for a massive expansion of the federal
government's reach into the day-to-day life of virtually every
citizen, business and civic organization in the nation. That, in
itself, should be the subject of an extensive public conversation
and thoughtful debate. Instead, we have seen Congressional leaders
schedule snap votes on a 1,434-page bill that no one-repeat, no
one-has had a chance to read in its entirety, much less digest and
deliberate.
This bill has been advertised as an economic stimulus
bill-despite the fact that the Congressional Budget Office
estimates it will actually weaken our nation's long-term economic
growth. While the stimulative utility of the bill is, at best,
questionable, it would unquestionably rewrite the social contract
between the American people and their government. For example:
- The bill reverses the bipartisan and highly successful welfare
reforms of 1996 and drastically expands the welfare state. For
instance, it will start rewarding states for adding people to their
welfare rolls, rather than for helping them find gainful
employment. And contrary to long-established practice, it will
entitle able-bodied adults without children to receive cash
assistance.
- It does extreme violence to the concept of federalism-bailing
out states that have spent irresponsibly at the expense of
taxpayers in states that have been fiscally prudent.
- It greatly shifts the responsibility and power over health care
delivery and decision making from individuals to government. Among
other things, it would create a new federal health board to decide
which medical services are "effective" in America, paving the way
for government effectively to overrule the clinical decisions of
private physicians.
- It deliberately censors religious speech and worship on school
campuses by prohibiting use of any "stimulus" funds for facilities
that are used for sectarian instruction, religious worship, or a
school of divinity.
The list goes on. These and similar provisions will mean
fundamental changes in our society. In many instances, the bill
would establish policies that directly challenge widely held
American values.
We are appalled that Congress is even contemplating such
profound changes with so little openness and due diligence. In the
past, major policy changes in our welfare system, or health care,
or trade policies, etc., were always, quite properly, preceded by
extensive public conversation and full debate. That is how a
democracy should make important decisions.
The failure of Congress and the Administration to allow that
debate is damaging to our democracy. Both chambers of Congress
suspended their budget rules to push it along. And both the
President and the leaders of the House and Senate have violated
their solemn promises that the bill would be available for several
days of public review prior to voting, so that the American people
might have a chance to learn what is in the bill and to make their
views known to their elected officials.
This reckless approach to governance can only undermine public
faith in our elected officials and our government as a whole. We
call on Congress and the Administration to live up to their
promises and stated ideals, and give the democratic process a
chance to work.
Ed Feulner
is president of The Heritage Foundation.