January 29, 2009
By Helle C. Dale
Do actions really speak louder than words? Not always. Sometimes
words speak louder than actions. In politics that is actually often
the case. President Obama's announcement last week that he will be
closing Guantanamo Bay has been greeted here and abroad with
jubilation, every bit as much as if the gates of the detention
center had been permanently shut, chained and padlocked.
Some people didn't even seem to realize that there is a
difference between word and deed. As The Washington Post on Friday
crowed: "Bush's war on terror ends abruptly." And not a minute too
soon, from the perspective of The Post. But sorry, no. The world
did not change substantially on Mr. Obama's second day in office
(any more than it did on his first, actually).
Abroad, Mr. Obama's election in and of itself has been a
watershed event for the image of the United States. Not only is he
the first elected African-American leader of a Western nation, but
he is also considered the "Anti-Bush." Former President George Bush
did actually announce in the fall that his administration would
look for a way to close Gitmo, but did that earn him any goodwill
here or abroad? Of course not.
Mr. Obama's signing of the executive order to close the camp on
Thursday, however, has been hailed by international leaders as a
great moral victory - even though there is a more than a good
chance that it will make the world a more dangerous place for all
of us. Reclaiming America's moral leadership was what Mr. Obama
himself called it, and moral leadership is a fine thing indeed -
Europeans in particular are great ones for reaching the moral high
ground. But reclaiming moral leadership is nowhere as difficult to
attain as keeping a nation safe from crazed Islamist fanatics, as
the new U.S. president will soon find.
European leaders lost no time claiming the credit for Mr.
Obama's decision. Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos
said that closing Guantanamo is a move "which Spain and Europe have
demanded." So did German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier,
who told the BBC: "Germany belongs to the group of countries like
the UK who demanded closure of Guantanamo. It's a question of
credibility. Its closure is necessary for the USA, especially if
the U.S. wants to restore its credibility in the Middle East and in
the Arab world." At least Mr. Steinmeier offered to help with the
detainees (an offer that was notably never extended to the Bush
administration): "If Europeans are asked, we should not rule out
helping." U.N. Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay praised Mr.
Obama for making the closure of Guantanamo Bay a priority and for
caring about the fundamental rights of its detainees, who have not
had court appointed lawyers and Miranda rights read to them, poor
Fortunately for Mr. Obama, words in this case do speak louder
than actions. For Mr. Obama, the issue of Guantanamo Bay is red
meat to be thrown to his liberal supporters, who have been getting
more and more restless. When he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos on
"This Week" that he thought Gitmo might be closed within his first
term, liberal alarm bells went off. So now the president is on
record as per executive order that it will happen within a year, or
at least "as soon as practicable." It is not very clear, though,
how much the president is in command of his own policy. During
Friday's signing ceremony, Mr. Obama appeared not to know that he
would be signing four separate orders and had to refer repeatedly
to White House Legal Counsel Greg Craig for answers to questions
from the media. Nor was he able to answer a question about the
future of the detainees. For the Obama White House, closing Gitmo
is essentially a symbolic action.
(One order related to the actual closing of Guantanamo and what
to do with the detainees. One addressed the issue of future
detainees. One made the Army Field Manual the standard by which
interrogations should be conducted and closed the CIA "secret
prisons" that caused such consternation in Europe. And one dealt
with the Ali Al-Marri case, a U.S. resident who is in detention in
Charleston.) But symbols are undeniably important in foreign
affairs, as they are in all walks of life. Gitmo, interrogation
techniques, secret prisons - these have been some of the worst
irritants in the relations between the United States and its
allies. As has often been the case, the United States did the dirty
work, while the Europeans got to claim moral superiority by
denouncing U.S. actions.
Well, Mr. Obama has learned from their example and taken a step
towards reclaiming that ground. Here's hoping that he is enjoying
the glow of the moment, for it will only last until the first of
the released terrorists strikes and kills again.
Helle Dale is
director of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy
Studies at the Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in the Washington Times
Do actions really speak louder than words? Not always. Sometimes words speak louder than actions. In politics that is actually often the case. President Obama's announcement last week that he will be closing Guantanamo Bay has been greeted here and abroad with jubilation, every bit as much as if the gates of the detention center had been permanently shut, chained and padlocked.
Helle C. Dale
Senior Fellow for Public Diplomacy
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973