August 6, 2008
By Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
There aren't many who long for a return to the 1970s. Those of
us old enough to recall that decade tend to think of gas lines, a
hostage crisis and Watergate. President Jimmy Carter never used the
word "malaise," but he acted as if America was doomed to decline,
and it was his job to make sure it went smoothly.
There's some malaise around today, too.
High gasoline prices are back. Petroleum-producing nations (such
as Venezuela, Iran and Saudi Arabia) again hold us hostage -- this
time for petro-dollars, even as the value of our currency slides.
And polls show both the president and Congress have their lowest
approval ratings in decades.
With so much discontent, who would want to go back to the
policies of the 1970s? None other than the self-professed
presidential candidate of "change," Barack Obama.
Sen. Obama recently unveiled an economic plan that revolves
around raising taxes on the wealthy. His plan would jack up the top
marginal rate to roughly 50 percent for those making more than
$250,000 a year. And that doesn't include state and local
Obama promises to "soak the rich" three times over by 1.
repealing the Bush tax cuts on capital gains and dividends; 2.
bumping the top two tax rates back up to 36 and 39.6 percent; and
3. slapping them with additional Social Security taxes. The total
tax pain would be greatest for those who live in high-tax cities
and states, including New York, Maryland and California. Some there
would have to pay up to 66 cents in taxes on every new dollar they
earn. Confiscatory tax rates like that only encourage high earners
to work less and produce less.
Those sort of tax rates would take us right back to the Carter
era. That's the last time rates were that high.
Of course, when tax rates are high, wealthy people spend their
time developing tax shelters instead of reinvesting in their
businesses. That may be great news for lobbyists and tax attorneys,
but it's bad news for everyone else.
It was a true "candidate of change" who rescued the U.S. from
the doldrums of the '70s. "Reaganesque lower taxes and
deregulation," economic historian John Steele Gordon wrote in The
Wall Street Journal recently, "sparked an enormous economic boom
that has now lasted, with two brief and shallow recessions, for
more than 25 years."
The rest of the world learned Reagan's lesson, too. Most
countries slashed tax rates after we did, and generated growth of
their own. By reversing that policy, Obama would put the U.S. in
with an ever shrinking group of nations that cling to the failed
policies of the past, and are suffering for it.
Only six of the top 30 industrial nations have a tax rate for
all levels of government combined that adds up to more than 55
percent. Obama's tax plan would give us a higher top rate than such
high-tax nations as Sweden and Denmark. And these sorts of tax
rates slow the economy.
Among those six high tax countries the average unemployment rate
is 7.35 percent. Contrast that with our own unemployment rate,
which recently rose to 5.5 percent still a low figure by historic
The math is simple: Lower tax rates encourage more economic
growth and lower unemployment. Higher tax rates lead to slower
growth and lower wages. In 2001 and 2003, President Bush pressed
Ronald Reagan's tax-cutting policies even further, slashing tax
rates and boosting the economy into several more years of growth.
The sensible policy today would be to make those cuts permanent, so
business owners and entrepreneurs could plan for the future.
The only other option is a return to the discredited policies of
the '70s. And that's a change we simply can't afford.
Ed Feulner is
president of The Heritage Foundation.
First published in the Indianapolis Star
There aren't many who long for a return to the 1970s. Those of us old enough to recall that decade tend to think of gas lines, a hostage crisis and Watergate. President Jimmy Carter never used the word "malaise," but he acted as if America was doomed to decline, and it was his job to make sure it went smoothly.
Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
Founder, Chairman of the Asian Studies Center, and Chung Ju-yung Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2015, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973