May 21, 2008
By Israel Ortega
Between 1970 and 2005, the number of children living in
two-parent homes has dropped from 85 percent to 68 percent.
Essentially, one third of all U.S. children are now born outside of
wedlock. Of significance, 46 percent of all babies born out of
wedlock are Hispanic. Why should our community care? Or even yet,
why should our government care?
Well according to a recent report by the Institute for American
Values and the Georgia Family Council, broken families impose a
high cost on every single American taxpayer.
Lately, poverty and hunger have been generating increased media
attention thanks to the primary election. Unfortunately, rather
than talking about real ways to lift people out of poverty,
politicians have mostly talked about increasing government programs
that would make people even more dependent on federal handouts.
While such promises may make for good political sound bites on the
stump, they grossly disservice the very people they aim to
Empirical evidence continues to show that divorce and unwed
childbearing leads to higher rates of crime, drug abuse, education
failure, domestic violence and poverty. In fact, the authors of
"The Taxpayer Costs of Divorce and Unwed Childbearing" suggest that
marriage alone would lift 60 percent of households headed by a
single female out of poverty.
Using 2006 figures, married families are less likely to depend
on food stamps than single-family households. And according to a
paper published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
increases in the proportion of adolescents born outside of marriage
was linked to an increase in arrest rates for 15- to
Even if one doesn't think there's a moral imperative to stop the
growing number of children born out of wedlock and the rise of
divorce rates, the price tag from this sad trend is startling.
American tax payers pay approximately $112 billion every year to
support broken families. This number includes programs such as
Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance.
For far too long, lawmakers have avoided addressing these
troubling statistics. They keep throwing money around, apparently
hoping that through increased federal assistance, poverty and
hunger will magically disappear.
But it's been more than 45 years since President Lyndon B.
Johnson launched his "War against Poverty," and the numbers reveal
that this federal approach does not work.
A far sounder approach has been to encourage the promotion of
the family structure as a means to truly lift people out of
poverty. Instead of encouraging teens to engage in premarital sex,
conservatives have been arguing for a return to family values to
decrease the number of teens with sexually transmitted diseases in
Unfortunately too many politicians consider promoting
traditional family values too controversial, or taboo.
Sadly, as the data suggest unless our elected officials muster
up the courage to talk about the need to reduce unwed pregnancies,
we'll have no choice but to pay for the high cost of broken
families in our country--both in money and human pain.
Israel Ortega is a Senior Media Services Associate at the
First Appeared in Hola Kentucky
Between 1970 and 2005, the number of children living in two-parent homes has dropped from 85 percent to 68 percent. Essentially, one third of all U.S. children are now born outside of wedlock. Of significance, 46 percent of all babies born out of wedlock are Hispanic. Why should our community care? Or even yet, why should our government care?
Contributor, The Foundry
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973