June 7, 2007
By Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
You can learn a lot by reading someone's diary. Consider The
Reagan Diaries. Anyone who still buys the absurd notion that
our 40th president was an "amiable dunce" will be shocked to read
the words of a first-rate leader, guiding policy and easily
outflanking his political opponents.
To some, including author and historian Lee Edwards, Reagan's
grasp of policy is no surprise. Edwards visited the former actor's
home in the 1960s and was impressed with his book collection,
including many volumes on conservatism. The margins were filled
with Reagan's notes.
Listening to some reporters, though, you'd never guess Reagan
could even read. "[Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret
Thatcher] quickly formed a bond that overcame their differences of
age, gender and -- many whisper -- IQ scores," wrote Washington
Post columnist David Broder in 1989. Or as former CBS White House
reporter Leslie Stahl put it, "he was a person who didn't
understand the issues at all . . ."
The diaries shred that insult. Even those who disagreed with him
can't seriously pretend Reagan didn't know the issues. In 1981,
Reagan wrote about Thatcher. She "expressed regret that she tried
to reduce govt. spending a step at a time & was defeated in
each attempt. Said she should have done it our way -- an entire
package -- all or nothing," he wrote. Maybe there wasn't such an IQ
gap after all.
Reagan also described how he outfoxed congressional liberals.
"They want to include a reduction of the inc. tax rate on unearned
income from 70 percent to the 50 percent top rate on earned inc. We
wanted that in the 1st place but were sure they'd attack us as
favoring the rich," he wrote in May 1981. "I'll hail it as a great
The diaries also show a president guiding foreign policy. "I
told Al H[aig] I had decided to accept his resignation," Reagan
wrote in 1982. Why? "The only disagreement was over whether I made
policy or the Sec. of State did." So much for the idea that Reagan
was a puppet of his advisers.
The key foreign policy issue was the Soviet Union. "We're
convinced they want above all to negotiate away our right to seek
defensive weapon [sic] against ballistic missiles," Reagan wrote in
1984. "They fear our technology. I believe such a defense could
render nuclear weapons obsolete & thus we could rid the world
of that threat." After Mikhail Gorbachev became Soviet premier,
Reagan met with him several times. "He really wants more reduction
of nuclear weapons. I think we'll make progress on the 'Start'
Treaty [START, the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks]," Reagan wrote
A year later he noted, "Soviets have stopped jamming radio
broadcasts such as Radio Liberty & all the others. They have
also announced they are releasing 120 pol. prisoners." Seemingly
against the odds, the Cold War ended peacefully.
Still, Reagan occasionally failed. In 1983, he requested a
meeting with photographer Ansel Adams. "He has expressed hatred for
me because of my supposed stand on the environment." Reagan
couldn't bring Adams around. "I'm afraid I was talking to ears that
refused to hear," he wrote.
When the diaries first came out, reviewers focused on the family
squabbles that any parent deals with. But the real story of the
diaries is its revelation of Reagan: the inspiring leader, full of
big ideas and working hard to make those ideas a reality. To a
large extent, he succeeded.
Not bad for an unemployed actor who supposedly "didn't
understand the issues at all."
Ed Feulner is
president of the Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times
You can learn a lot by reading someone's diary. Consider The Reagan Diaries. Anyone who still buys the absurd notion that our 40th president was an "amiable dunce" will be shocked to read the words of a first-rate leader, guiding policy and easily outflanking his political opponents.
Edwin J. Feulner, Ph.D.
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973