October 28, 2006
By Eugene Hickok
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings recently commented that
the No Child Left Behind Act is nearly perfect. "I talk about No
Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It's 99.9 percent pure,"
Even if Secretary Spellings were right that NCLB is 99.9% pure,
it still would not be the formula for what ails American
The current debate over NCLB overlooks a critical problem:
Nothing the administration does under NCLB will ensure the law's
promise that every child will be proficient in reading and math by
2014. For reasons unrelated to the law's merit, NCLB is simply not
up to the task. Something far more profound and transformative must
happen for American education to offer every child the opportunity
The deeper problem is the existing institutional architecture of
American public education. No Child Left Behind erects an
accountability system atop the status quo and requires states to
provide families with options when schools fail. But public
education governance, structure, finance, management and politics
Here is the heart of the problem: American public education --
because of the way it is structured, administered, funded and
understood by parents, teachers, administrators and taxpayers -- is
incapable of delivering on the promises of NCLB. The root of the
problem isn't in the law; it's in the American education system. It
can't get there from here.
Today's public education system essentially tells parents: "This
is the school your child will attend. This is when we teach, what
we teach and who will teach." In short, it puts the system ahead of
We need an education environment that listens and responds when
a parent says: "This is my child; these are my hopes and dreams for
my child, his needs and interests, his strengths and weaknesses.
Why should I entrust my child to your care?" We need educational
opportunities that put the child first.
NCLB likely will show just how much needs to happen to achieve
this. But the law itself can't help us do it. No federal law ever
To move us in the right direction, we need to toss aside certain
assumptions. First, we must not confuse education with schooling.
Education takes place long before a child enters school and lasts a
lifetime. Schooling is about institutions and infrastructure. We
need to focus on education in America, not just schooling.
Second, we need to put aside the tiresome debate over public
versus private education. What matters is the quality of the
education a child receives, not where he or she receives it. In the
name of preserving public schooling, we have created obstacles to
improving education for all our children. Public education belongs
to the people. Shouldn't we be the ones deciding where our children
go to school? Why should we feel comfortable with the government
making such a fundamentally important decision?
A new vision of education in America should embrace the
principles on which America is supposed to be based: freedom,
equality, opportunity, responsibility and ownership. The status quo
lacks freedom, and the façade of equality has allowed an
achievement gap to haunt the nation. Millions are denied a real
opportunity. Newly minted accountability systems have school
administrators gagging and leave too many parents confused,
resulting in too many failing to take responsibility for the future
of our children.
As for ownership, our public schools have become institutions of
government, serving bureaucracies rather than the public. It's as
though the system owns us rather than we owning the system.
Imagine what education in America could look like with these new
principles in place. With freedom, families could decide how best
to educate their children. Equality would be measured in terms of
the education children receive and each student's achievement,
rather than merely in dollars spent per student. Responsibility
would begin at home; parents would have the power to determine
whether their children are receiving a quality education. This more
robust notion of accountability would enable people to determine
how much their investment yields in terms of a child's
Gradually, families might begin to take back ownership of their
children's education. Ownership is essential, giving a sense of
authority that could drive ongoing improvement in education. The
relationship of family, child and education is direct and tangible,
rather than distorted by the demands of a system.
Of course, we have far to go before this becomes reality. But it
would be a mistake to think that No Child Left Behind delivers the
education system we need. At best, it will help us understand just
how far we have to go, fueling our frustrations and disappointments
along the way. NCLB is a wake-up call. What's needed is an American
Eugene Hickok is a Bradley fellow in education at The
Heritage Foundation and Senior Policy Director at Dutko Worldwide.
He was deputy secretary of education during President George W.
Bush's first term.
First appeared in WashingtonPost.com
Education Secretary Margaret Spellings recently commented that the No Child Left Behind Act is nearly perfect. "I talk about No Child Left Behind like Ivory soap: It's 99.9 percent pure," Spellings said.
Bradley Fellow in Education Policy
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973