October 31, 2005
By Peter Brookes
The most immediate threat Iran poses to
American national security isn't its nuclear (weapons) program.
It's the safe haven Tehran is giving al Qaeda terrorists, who are
planning and directing jihad across the globe.
If the United States and its allies in the War on Terror don't
take firm action against Iranian support to al Qaeda, the price in
blood and treasure attributable to Osama bin Laden's killers - in
Iraq and elsewhere - will continue to soar.
Shockingly, it's been long forgotten that Iran became home to some
of al Qaeda's most wanted after the fall 2001 invasion of
Afghanistan. Tehran admitted as much, claiming that al Qaeda
operatives were under "house arrest" and would be tried.
Of course, nothing of the sort happened . . .
So al Qaeda "refugees" from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, North
Africa and Europe - including senior military commander Saif al
Adel, three of Osama's sons and spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith - now
operate freely from Iran.
In fact, just last week, the German monthly magazine Cicero,
citing Western intelligence sources, claimed that as many as 25 al
Qaeda thugs are living in Iran under the protection of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Cicero cites a "top-ranking" Western intelligence official saying,
"This is not incarceration or house arrest. They [al Qaeda members]
can move around as they please." The IRGC even provides logistics
help and training to al Qaeda.
Cicero doesn't mention which al Qaeda operations Iran is
supporting, but there's little doubt that Tehran is aiding the
terror in Iraq, where there are more and more Iranian
"fingerprints" on insurgent/terrorist attacks.
Iran and al Qaeda have been tight for some time. The 9/11
Commission said that al Qaeda passed freely though Iran before
9/11, including at least eight of the 14 "muscle" hijackers that
commandeered the four ill-fated planes. After the USS Cole bombing
in 2000, Iranian officials approached al Qaeda to propose a
partnership for future anti-U.S. attacks. (Osama nixed the offer
for fear of alienating Saudi supporters.)
Al Qaeda also collaborated with Iran in the 1996 bombing of the
Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. And U.S. intercepts caught al Qaeda
operatives in Iran communicating with terrorists in Saudi Arabia
before the 2003 attacks there.
And, though conventional wisdom has bin Laden somewhere along the
Afghan-Pakistani border, there have also been rumors that he and
his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, are under Iran's protection.
Of course, Iran and al Qaeda aren't natural allies. Iran is
Persian/Shia, while al Qaeda is Arab/Sunni. But, for the moment,
Iran and al Qaeda seem to be looking beyond this and toward a
common goal - global Islamic rule and American failure in
Getting Tehran to cough up Saif al Adel, al Qaeda's No. 3, would
be a major coup. The former Egyptian Special Forces colonel was
involved in attacking U.S. forces in Mogadishu (1993) and the U.S.
embassies in Kenya/Tanzania (1998). He was also a player in the
Cole assault, trained 9/11 hijackers, orchestrated Saudi attacks
and acts as an al Qaeda-Hezbollah liaison. He's surely involved in
supporting Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's thugs in Iraq.
And not addressing the Iran-al Qaeda axis could allow Iran to
become al Qaeda's "new Afghanistan" - a base where Osama's henchmen
could raise funds, recruit/train new footsoldiers and plan/direct
Repeated calls for Iran to turn over al Qaeda members to their
countries of origin have gone nowhere. It's time to stop giving
Tehran a pass.
Tough, multilateral economic sanctions against Iran are long
overdue. Iran's economy has been on the skids for a while; Tehran
would feel the pain if the United Nations - or simply its major
trading partners, such as Germany, France and Italy - put the
The sound of Tehran's high-pitched squeals whenever economic
sanctions are even mentioned - usually over its nuclear (weapons)
program - seems to indicate that these measures are something the
mullahs would rather avoid.
There's no guarantee that sanctions will get Tehran to swear off
its terrorist ways. But, because Iran's economy is so centralized,
trade gives the mullahs pocket change to cause trouble at home and
across the globe.
So while a nuclear-armed Iran is a serious - but future - threat
that has a (slim) chance of a diplomatic solution, the Iranian-al
Qaeda terrorist threat is here and now, making the time for action
- not negotiations - long past.
Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow. His
book, "A Devil's Triangle: Terrorism, WMD and Rogue States," is
First appeared in the New York Post
The most immediate threat Iran poses to American national security isn't its nuclear (weapons) program. It's the safe haven Tehran is giving al Qaeda terrorists, who are planning and directing jihad across the globe.
Senior Fellow, National Security Affairs
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2015, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973