December 27, 2001 | Commentary on Political Thought
Jefferson, pilloried as the village atheist during his first
presidential campaign, was unruffled. "Sir," he replied, "no nation
has ever yet existed or been governed without religion. Nor can
be." He explained that, as the nation's chief executive, he was
obliged to give religion its public due.
The story is worth recalling as we mark the 200th anniversary of
Jefferson's famous statement on religion and politics -- that the
First Amendment built "a wall of separation between church and
state." Many will celebrate the wall metaphor as the defining
feature of America's secular republic. But recent scholarship into
its background may temper the festivities.
The expression is found nowhere in the Constitution, appearing
instead in a letter to Connecticut Baptists dated Jan. 1, 1802. It
was largely unheralded, in fact, until the Supreme Court invoked it
in a 1947 case concerning government aid to parochial schools.
Courts now cite the phrase to deny any form of public support for
religion. Liberals quote it as holy writ, while conservatives
dismiss the letter as marginal to the religious temper of the
Historians are casting fresh doubts on each of these views. In a
forthcoming book, "Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation,"
American University Professor Daniel Dreisbach argues that the
letter's meaning cannot be understood apart from the politics of
the time. A culture war was raging: Jefferson's Republicans,
jealously protective of the separation of powers, accused the
Federalists of secretly being monarchists, keen to exploit religion
for partisan purposes.
Jefferson meant to counter the smear campaign against him and
his Republican principles. But he also intended to soothe his
allies. "It was a political statement," Dreisbach writes,
"carefully crafted to reassure Jefferson's Baptist constituents in
New England of his continuing commitment to their religious
rights." In much of colonial America, where Congregationalism or
Anglicanism enjoyed tax support as state churches, Baptists
struggled as a beleaguered minority.
Their resentment fueled the political quest for religious
liberty. Jefferson agreed with these dissenters -- as did virtually
all the Founders -- that when government coerces conscience in
matters of faith it threatens both civic peace and the purity of
religion. That's why he begins the letter by insisting that
"religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God."
It was the same argument he used 17 years earlier in a "Bill for
Establishing Religious Freedom" in his native Virginia -- a
landmark victory made possible by massive evangelical
Here was a view of the sanctity of conscience held as
tenaciously by Baptist preacher John Leland as it was by
Enlightenment leader John Locke. Jefferson's wall, Dreisbach
concludes, wasn't meant to bar religion from public life but to
prevent faith from being either politicized or tread upon by
James Hutson, manuscript curator for the Library of Congress,
agrees. He says Jefferson placed great value on symbolic support to
religion. Two days after writing the letter, the president attended
church services in the House of Representatives, a practice he
would continue for years. He opened up federal buildings to a
variety of religious services. "It is no exaggeration to say that,
on Sundays in Washington during Thomas Jefferson's presidency, the
state became the church," Hutson says.
Jefferson was no closet Christian, nor did he approve of federal
subsidies for churches. He notoriously declined to proclaim
national days of thanksgiving. But government at all levels could
accommodate religious expression -- even worship services -- as
long as it was voluntary and the state didn't pick favorites.
Jefferson saw no conflict between the First Amendment and the
availability of public property, public facilities and even
government personnel to religious bodies.
The reason went beyond mere politics. When Jefferson remarked
that no nation could be governed without religion, he did not have
in mind the corrupted variety of government churches. In this, he
argued exactly as the most pious Founders did: Religious belief --
freely chosen and given wide public space -- nurtured morality and
thus supported a free society.
That ought to make both the theocrats and the secularists uneasy. For Jefferson's wall between church and state was meant to serve a greater goal -- to promote and preserve religious liberty for Americans of all faiths.
Joseph Loconte is the William E. Simon fellow in religion and a free society at The Heritage Foundation, and a commentator for National Public Radio.
Distributed nationally by Knight-Ridder/Tribune News Wire