September 21, 1995
By Marshall Wittmann and Charles P. Griffin
Washington lobbyists may be in your state -- and they are trying
to scare you.
They believe that once you hear what the House of
Representatives is up to -- it voted recently to end welfare for
lobbyists -- you'll be as scared as they are.
If the proposed reform legislation passes, these "beltway
bandits" no longer will be able to use government grants -- your
hard-earned tax dollars -- to subsidize their political advocacy.
Never mind that they didn't ask you whether you agree with their
causes or not. They just want your tax dollars. And they won't rest
until they are sure they can continue to feed at the public
Unknown to most Americans, these lobbyists have relied on 40
years of political patronage in Congress to obtain billions of
taxpayer dollars that routinely are used to lobby for even more
government money. It works like this: A non-profit advocacy group
searches through the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance -- a
guide to more than $40 billion in annual government giveaways -- to
find some program related to its activities. The organization then
applies to federal bureaucrats in Washington for a "grant" and
receives a fat check from the U.S. Treasury.
Unfortunately, each federal dollar these advocacy groups receive
from Washington frees up other money, which can then be spent on
lobbying and other political activities you may or may not agree
with. In addition, federal grantees are allowed to "skim" a certain
percentage of each grant to apply toward "overhead" or
"administrative" expenses. This percentage can range anywhere from
10 to 30 percent or more.
A perfect example is the National Council of Senior Citizens
(NCSC). Although this organization has actively lobbied Congress
against a balanced-budget amendment and other policies, and
operates a political action committee that contributes thousands of
dollars each year to political candidates, NCSC is 96 percent
taxpayer funded. According to its 1993 IRS filing, $72,910,930 of
$75,956,825 in revenue came from the government. The bulk of this
money came from one of the giveaways in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance called the "Senior Community Service Employment
Did the NCSC ever ask you whether you wanted a balanced budget
or if you support their slate of political candidates? It didn't
ask us either. But it didn't hesitate to take our money -- and
Of course, your local non-profit couldn't get money from this
program. The NCSC is one of only nine national groups allowed to
receive the $320 million available from this grant. Why? Because
they have the clout and the lobbyists -- bought, in large part,
with your money.
Needless to say, these folks aren't going to take Congress's
effort to end such practices lying down. One of their "watchdog"
groups, OMB Watch, has been sent out to scare small local
non-profits. They want these local groups to call Washington and
express concern that the proposed reforms will prevent them from
pursuing their activities. In fact, local non-profits that take
money from the government usually spend the money wisely -- by
directly helping people, not by paying high-priced lobbyists in
Believe it or not, OMB Watch is now financing a 27 state "road
show" to stir up local non-profits. Given the number of states
being visited, the costs are likely to be substantial.
Who is financing this little circus? After a little digging, we
found out that OMB Watch is linked to an organization called the
Unison Institute, which receives a taxpayer subsidy. In fact, the
two organizations jointly run the "Right-to-Know" computer network
(RTK Net) on the Internet, which is being used as a primary tool
for the campaign to protect welfare for lobbyists. The credits on
RTK Net proudly proclaim that it is paid for by "multiple
philanthropic and government agencies," including the Environmental
Protection Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban
In other words, the same shell game these groups use to obtain
your tax dollars for lobbying is being used to preserve the shell
So, when the "road show" arrives in your town, and you hear
horror stories about babies crying and old folks dying because of
what the new meanies in Congress want to do to non-profit
organizations that lobby, don't be fooled.
Just ask if the people making the claims receive any government
funding. Then ask why they didn't check with you before they used
your money to lobby for their cause.
Note: Marshall Wittmann is former Senior Fellow in Congressional
Affairs and Charles P. Griffin is former Deputy House Liaison at The Heritage Foundation, Washington,
D.C. Heritage receives no federal funds and does no lobbying.
Return to The Heritage Foundation's Commentary section.
ED092195b: Lobbyists Bring Scare Tactics To Your Hometown
Read More >>
Charles P. Griffin
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973