National Security and Defense

America must be capable of proactively protecting the nation and its citizens. Our armed forces must be ready to act anywhere in the world where vital national interests are threatened. This can be achieved by giving the military the resources it needs to keep us safe and maintain freedom.

HIGHLIGHTS

Our Research & Offerings on National Security and Defense
Find more work on National Security and Defense
  • Backgrounder posted August 2, 2004 by Jack Spencer The Use of Directed-Energy Weapons to Protect Critical Infrastructure

    America's critical infrastructure--e.g., power plants, transportation hubs, and telecommunications facilities--is becoming increasingly vulnerable to precision missile attacks. Guided missile technology and the missiles themselves have been available for years, but the emergence of global terror networks, sophisticated smuggling techniques, and the post-September 11 security environment have made the… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted November 18, 2008 by Theodore Bromund British Defense Cuts Threaten the Anglo-American SpecialRelationship

    Great Britain is a founding member of NATO. It is currently fighting wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, but is spending less of its gross domestic product (GDP) on its armed forces than at any point since the Great Depression. A failure of political leadership in Britain has allowed defense issues, and the standing… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted March 30, 2007 by Baker Spring Ten Myths About the Defense Budget

    "Immense Expense Is Mainly in Defense" is a parody tune performed by the Capitol Steps, a Washington-based troupe; but while the tune has a nice rhyme scheme, it does not reflect the facts concerning recent federal budgets. By historical standards, the federal government's investment in defense is relatively modest.… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted March 8, 2007 by Mackenzie Eaglen The DHS Budget for FY 2008: Time for a Comprehensive Approach toHomeland Security

    In the years since the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was established, the Bush Administra­tion has demonstrated its commitment to homeland security by proposing reasonable budgets. The Administration's proposed DHS budget of $46.4 bil­lion for fiscal year (FY) 2008 continues this tradition by requesting an 8 percent increase over the FY 2007 budget.… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted July 23, 2008 by Ray Walser, Ph.D. Mexico, Drug Cartels, and the Merida Initiative: A Fight We CannotAfford to Lose

    Since Mexican President Felipe Calderón took office in 2006, a virulent war has raged with the Mex­ican drug cartels, and this drug-related violence has spilled across the U.S. border, threatening U.S. lives and public safety. Geostrategic pessimists fear that the U.S. has been taking Mexico's stability for granted and warn… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted June 27, 2007 by Ariel Cohen, Ph.D. How to Confront Russia's Anti-American Foreign Policy

    President George W. Bush's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Kennebunkport, Maine, on July 1-2 may be the last opportunity to improve U.S.-Russian relations before the two leaders leave office in 2008-2009. In Kennebunkport, President Bush may find out whether Putin's proposal at the G-8 summit to cooperate on missile defense with the U.S.… Read more

  • WebMemo posted September 25, 2009 by Hans Von Spakovsky Defunding ACORN: Necessary and Proper, and Certainly Constitutional

    Barring the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) from receiving federal funds through the Defund ACORN Act is perfectly constitutional. It certainly is not a bill of attainder, as some recent reports have claimed.[1] The House of Representatives voted on September 17, 2009, to specifically prohibit ACORN from receiving… Read more

  • Backgrounder posted June 15, 2007 by James Carafano, Ph.D. Enduring Alliances Empower America's Long-War Strategy

    The threats of the new century are international in character and indeterminable in length, and they require an international response. Alone, the United States cannot win the long war against transnational terrorism, nor can it respond effectively to the other emerging national security concerns of the 21st century. America… Read more

Find more work on National Security and Defense
Find more work on National Security and Defense