• Heritage Action
  • More
Backgrounder Update #174

March 6, 1992

Subic Bay: How Bush Can Turn a Former Military Asset Into A Future Economic Asset


(Archived document, may contain errors)

3/02 174


(Updating Asian Studies Center Backgrounder No. 109, "Last Chance for the U.S.-Philippine Alliance," October 23, 1990.) Alter telling the United States last December 27 that it has one year to leave its last military base in her country, Philippine President Corazon Aquino now wants another favor. She is asking the U.S. to delay the depamire of two large U.S. Navy floating drydocks from Subic Bay, due to leave next month. She apparently hopes that the drydocks, which are used to repair large ships, will make Subic more attractive to American investors interested in turning the former U.S. naval base into a center for trade and industrial development. For sum, Washington owes Aquino no favors. America is justified in being angry at her for her failure to defend the August 1991 bases treaty and her subsequent failure even to allow the U.S. a more graceful three-year withdrawal from Subic. Yet despite Washington's justifiable anger, the Bush Administration should consider favorably Aquino's request. What is in it for America is America's long-term influence in Asia. No more than a speck of vision is needed to see that Subic could become a hub of American commercial activity in Southeast Asia. But for this to happen, Washington should be ready to help American investors such as the Perot Group, headed by Ross Perot, who are inter- ested in assuming control of some of Subic's impressive facilities. The Bush Administration thus should delay the departure of its drydocks in Subic until next November. This will give more time for American investors to lease or purchase the drydocks. These drydocks will make Subic's shipyard much more attractive to U.S. investors.by.increasing the num- ber of large commercial ships that can be repaireA thus increasing Subic's competitiveness with other shipyards in the region. In addition, the U.S. Navy should delay the transfer of such equipment as radars and air traffic control consoles necessary for Cubi Point Air Station to function as a com- mercial air field. This will allow the U.S. to turn a military asset of the past into an economic asset of the future. Assisting the transformation of Subic could benefit Americans economically. The U.S. Navy ap- pears to have no pressing need for the drydocks for the next six months. The cost of the delay is far less than the investment opportunities Americans stand to lose to Japan's Kawasaki Heavy Industries, or Singapore's Keppel Co., both of which are proposing to acquire Subic's ship repair facilities. TU Navy should consider its self interest: increasing opportunities for American commerce in Asia also will help justify a continued U.S. Navy presence in Asia to protect that comm=e. In addition, Subic still will be able to offer the Navy the advantage of low wage rates, compared to

Singapore or Japanj for a highly skilled, work force- with. generation& of experience repairing U.S. Navy shipir. With dkydocks, Subic will rewa@h capable of servicing U.S. ships at. great savings to the Naj.. Yet., to.date. the AdmWstratiorl has. shown little interest in helping U.S. companies. Instead., beffinning June 1, the Navy plans to fire about 4,500 Subic workem- This skilled work force then will sbm disperse. Delaying the transfer of the drydocks until November also will give the Philippine, government, which- will be. elected on May 11, time to decide whether it wants to rebuild a military relation 'ship. that will allow for continued U.S. access to Philippine bases. By supporting the transfer of Subic's facilities to American. investors, Manila will. be signaling its interest. in rebuilding military relations. with Washington. So far, front-running presidential candidates like Ramon Mitra and Fidel Ramos say that they are interested-in repairing U.S.-Philippine ties.- Such a new military relationship could be built. around the 1951 U.S.-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty. Instead of permanent bases in the Philippines, periodic access to bases during c rises could help the- U.S. respond more effectively to potential threats on. the Korean Peninsula and elsewhere in the region. A similar relationship based on. U.S. access and cooperadon@ is being. established with SingapQm, By using the Singapore arrangement as a model for military relationships -with the Philippines aq4 other countries in Southeast Asia, the U.S. can help preserve stability in Asia. Asia remains a vplatilp place where the end of the Cold War has unmasked long-dormant edmic and nationalist rivalries. The most important security question for the U.S. in Asia is the role of Japan. Washington liee4s to make sure that Japan does not again. become a military power. The best way in which the U.S. can prevent this is to envelop Japan in a web of U.S.-led military relationships that promote peace in Asia. A reconstituted.U.S.-Philippine strategic relationship should be part of this web. The privatization of Navy ship repair facilities at Subic advances the goal of rebiailding the relation- ship between Washington and Manila by helping American investors. andFilipino workers Mike. The U-.S. Navy, moreover, would benefit from. continued, albeit decreased, access to a strategically lo- cated repair and maintenance facility. And in the long run, hopes for a renewed military relationship between Washington and Manila would be'kept alive. These possible benefits far outweigh the negli- gible costs of delaying by six months the departure of the U.S. Navy's two drydocks from the Philip- pines.

Richard D. Fisher, Jr. Policy Analyst


Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.

The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.

More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.

Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."

Sign up to start your free subscription today!