Cument, may contain errors)
78 March 26, 1979 THE FR ON T-LINE S TA TES THE REALITIES IN
SOUTHERN AFRICA INTRODUCTION The Front Line States (FLS) are five
subsaharan African nations adjacent to Rhodesia: Angola, Botswana,
Mozambi que, Tanzania, and Zambia. All are relatively new nations,
all are former white-ruled colonies now ruled by black Africans,
and all have played and con tinue to play an important role in the
struggle against existing white-ruled states in Africa (Rhodesia
and South Africa).
The FLS share other characteristics as well. With one exception,
all are one-party states where Western ideas and institutions of
political and personal liberties do not apply. Some have
established special relationships with the Soviet Union and its
sate l lites. In all of them the economy is at least underdeveloped
and at worst in a state of crisis. Finally these five states are
among the most im- portant African states due to their size and
geographical location. Their policies play an important role in d
etermining the future of southern Africa and indeed of the whole
Third World.
The significance of the FLS in U.S. foreign policy reflects their
common characteristics. Their relationship with Rhodesia and South
Africa is crucial for the future stability of the region and the
American relationship with southern Africa. It is through the FLS
that the U.S. has sought to negotiate a peaceful settlement in
Rhodesia, but these efforts have so far been a failure.1 natural
resources make their economic development and accessibility
important to the U.S. and West European economies, as do their
inter national financial status. Their geopolitical position,
dominating Their 1. See, Samuel T. Francis Fthodesia in Transition
Heritage Foundation Back- grounder #62. 2 the peninsula of southern
Africa and facing both the Indian and South Atlantic Oceans, gives
them special strategic importance for the U.S and its access to
Mideastern oil.
In the recent past U.S. relations with these states have not been
friendly. Their anti -Western ideologies and policies have tended
to view the U.S. as an imperialist state allied with white
oligarchies in South Africa and Rhodesia (and previously with Portu
gal and the influence of the Soviets has encouraged this
perception.
In reassessing U.S. policy, some legislators advocate a more active
and sympathetic relationship with the FLS. Thus, it is urged that
economic assistance should be given to them to develop a friendlier
relationship and to promote their stabilization. Since the conflict
s in southern Africa have led to massive refugee problems for these
states, aid specifically oriented toward refugee assistance is
urged; Alsoisome-advocate international credit to assist the FLS
with their balance of payments deficit with the West and pro mote
economic linkages with Western states.
Clearly this involvesa.massive amount of aid. In 1975,for ex
ample,the Carter Administration sought congressional approval for 5
million for refugee as.sistance in Botswana, Mozambique, and
Zambia.
A further $50 0,000 was proposed to finance education and training
in Mozambique. From 1962 to 1977, total U.S. assistance tothese
five states was as follows TOTAL U.S. AID, 1962-1977 Angola
$200,000 (all in 1977 Botswana $45.9 million Mozambique $17.5
million Tanzania $195 2 million Zambia $14.2 million Source
Committee In addition, the World Bank and International Monetary
Development Association, as of June 30, 1978, had lent the
following amounts to the FLS Foreign Operations Subcommittee of
House Appropriations APP R OVED WORLD BANK IDA CUMULATIVE LENDING
OPERATIONS TO FRONTLINE STATES, JUNE 30, 1978 U.S Amount Number of
Loans Credits Angola 0 Botswana $108,050,000 14 Mozambique Tanzania
$604,900,000 15 Zambia $552,750,000 22 Total $1,265,700,000 51
Source: World Bank 3 The U.S.8 it should be noted, contributes over
28 gercent of the total World Bank subscription These
figures'contrast with economic aid and loans to Rhodesia.
From 1946 to 1975, the U.S. gave only $7 million in aid and loans
to Rhodesia (and none since 1966 of which all but $800,000 has been
repaid. The World Bank has lent about $87 million'to Rhodesia
through 1978 in five loans, less than to any single FLS borrower
and less than 10 percent of the total loans to all the FLS. The
principal reasons for th e lack of U.S. and international
assistance to Rhodesia have been the non-democratic and allegedly
oppressive nature of the government and the alleged unstable
political situationo The FLS, however, share many of th&
failings attributed to Rhodesia though t his has not deterred
economic aid to them Despite the humanitarian intentions of much of
this aid, some legislators feel that its usefulness has not been
demonstrated. The success of such programs depends on the nature of
the governments that receive it. T he inefficiencies, corruption,
instability, and outright tyranny in several of the E'LS raise
questions of how these governments would use increased assistance.
A survey of the in ternal politics, economic developments, and
international relations of the Front Line States is necessary to
assess the usefulness of continued or increased U.S. aid to their
governments ANGOLA Internal Politics Portugal granted independence
to Angola in 19
75. Prior to as well as after independence, three liberation move
ments c ontested for control of Angola. These were the Popular Move
ment for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) founded in 1956 and active
in armed struggle since 1961, led by Dr. Agostinho Neto, a Marxist
poet who was a member of the Portuguese Communist Party and a n
associate-of guerrilla leader Amilcar Cabral; the National Front
for the Liberation of Angola (E"LA which ip 1962 established a
Revolutionary Government in Exile in Zaire, led by Holden Roberto a
Baptist and reportedly the son-in-law of Zaire's Presiden t Mobutu
Sese Sob; and the National Union for the Total Independence of
Angola (UNITA founded in 1966 and led by Dr. Jonas Savimbi,
formerly associated with the FNLA. Neto's MPIA was closely
associated with the Soviet Union, which gave it assistance, while
the movements of Roberto and Savimbi were associated with Communist
China, which in 1974 provided considerable assistance to their
groups.
Angola became independent on November 11, 1975, and a bitter
struggle erupted among the three groups substantial ass istance
from the USSR and about 18,000 Cuban troops assisted them to become
dominant. The FNLA and UNITA formed a Net0 and the MPLA received 4
common government, the Peoples' Democratic Republic of Angola, in
January 1976, with Dr. Savimbi as President. D e spite the
dominance of Neto's faction, these rivals appear still to threaten
the MPLA government and to control considerable parts of the
country. Another resistance movement, the Front for the Liberation
of Cabinda Enclave FLEC long associated with the F NLA, is a
separatist movement in the oil-rich Cabinda province. More
recently, the Movement for the Socialist Union of Angola (MUSA) has
been founded by Moises Andre.
Andre was trained by the Soviets. in lbscow and was a member of the
FNLA and MPLA, though he now claims to be anti-Marxist and national
ist. The source of funds for the MUSA is not known.
Since taking power Net0 has stayed close to the Soviets and their
allies and has,sought to construct a "socialist" state on Marxist
lines. The government is that of a single party with no
constitution. The news media and much private property including
private medical care have been nationalized. The World Survey of
needoqpublished by Freedom House,in both 1978 and 1979 included
Angola in the "least freei" c a tegory in both political and civil
lib erties (along with North Korea and Cambodia On a rating of 1-7
seven being "least free" and 1 being "most free Angola is rated
seven in both categories 0-f 6 and 5 respectively in civil and
political rights in 1978 a nd this was upgraded to 5.&d 4 in
1979 Neto, who is a medical doctor with literary ambitions, appears
to be well versed in and dedicated to-Marxism-Leninism. He refuses
to allow any opposition or coalition with other liberation
movements.
Despite-his advoc acy of and assistance to "liberation" in Rhodesia
Net0 himself is a mulatto, married to a white Portuguese. He speaks
no African languages and few Africans hold position in the Angolan
leadership. He frequently sends his family to Portugal, where the
fami l ies of his Defense, Finance, and other high ranking
Ministers live. The MPLA is made up largely of mulattoes, who
represent only 5 percent of the population of Angola (about the
same percentage as whites in Rhodesia In contrast,Rhodesia had a
higher ratin g Neto's regime was effectively overthrown on May 27,
1977 by black dissident members of the MPLA led by former Interior
minister Nit0 Aves Batista, but this revolt was suppressed by Cuban
troops on behalf of Neto's government Econ'o The two most important
events for Angola's economy since in ependence have been the
Marxist orientation of the govern ment and the exodus of the vast
majority of white settlers following independence Prior to
decolonization, approximately 500,000 whites lived in Angola.
Almost e ntirely Portuguese, they were largely Set tlers who
provided the bulk of the technical and managerial infra structure
of the province. In the first six months of independence over
200,000 whites left Angola, and at the present time, 400,000 5
whites have l eft. Not only did the mass emigration mean the with
drawal of most of the trained personnel, but also the Europeans
left behind a vast amount of property and plant equipment. All of
this property was taken over by the new government and some was
redistrib u ted to the indigenous Angolans. In addition, Neto has
made no secret of his commitment to socialist ideology in economic
policy, his hostility to the private sector and the free market and
his general economic plans. Addressing a trade union conference Ne
t 0 has stated The long period of transition from a colonial
society to a socialist society will call for a multi-sided form of
economic organization transformation towards socialism will be
expressed by a steady growth of bath the State sector and the coop
e ra tive sector in the rural areas, and by a steady reduc tion of
the mixed sector, of the private capital sec tor But we do not want
to deceive anyone by conqealing the fact that we intend to follow
the road to socializing vices, and of everything that ca n be
socialized; and that we intend to do this as rapidly as possible As
of 1977, the government had implemented Neto's policies to The
progress of our economic our means of production, of finances of
trade, of ser I African Freedom Annual, 1978, p. 24) I t he extent
of nationalizing 100 percent of the production of coffee I media of
communication, One hundred percent of oil distribution and 61
percent of diamond production had also been nationalized Gulf Oil
facilities in Cabinda province, however, remain p r ivately owned
and provide 122,000 barrels per day in exports to the U.S The taxes
and revenues from these facilities account for 60-80 per cent of
the operating revenues of the Angolan government. As of the
beginning of 1978, the diamond production of Ang o la had fallen by
80 percent; the country imported over 50 percent of its food; and
the coffee crop, once one of the largest in the world, was down by
50 percent. One reason for the decline in coffee production was
that the coffee workers, members of the B akongo tribe, were active
in the support of the FNLA of opponents led to Neto's use of forced
labor.
Company has been asked by the government to return in order to in
crease diamond production and cotton, sugar, oil ship repairs, beer
breweries, banks, and the I The The civil war and repressive
treatment The De Beers Diamond 6 International Posture: Angola is a
member of the United Nations and the Organization of African Unity.
However, the U.S. vetoed its entrance to the U.N. on June 23, 1976
on the groun ds that a large Cuban military presence precluded
Angolan membership. On November 19, 1976 the U.S. reversed its veto
and Angola was admitted The OAU admitted Angola to membership on
February 11, 19
76. Since independence, Angola has aligned itself closely with the
Soviet Union and received substantial military and technical aid
from the U.S.S.R East Germany, and Cuba. Other Eastern bloc states
that have agreements with Angola include Bulgaria, Hunga ry,
Poland, and Romania Net0 has visited Moscow and Havana several
times since taking power, and Soviet and Cuban leaders have visited
Luanda.
Soon after independence, Senator DickClarkof the African Affairs
Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Com mittee stated that
If the MPLA wins, the Soviets will be lucky if they can hang on a
year or two Since this statement, the U.S.S.R. and its surro gates
have become more and more entrenched in Angola. The Soviets
contributed 170 million to Angola to put Ne t 0 in power and in
July 1976 Angola became the first African state to join the
Soviet-controlled Council for Mutual Economic Aid (CEMA In Oct
tober 1976, Net0 concluded a 20 year Friendship Treaty with the
Soviets. In June 1977 Angola signed a fishing agre e ment with the
USSR by which the latter may fish in Angolan waters, and Angola
receives 12 percent of the catch. This agreement in 1977 brought
20,000 tons of fish for Angola, though in 1974,under Portuguese
rule Angola's fishing catch was half a million t ons. As of April
1978 over 1
00. Soviets were stationed in Luanda to train secret police,
intelligence,and army officers. The Soviets have supplied tanks
MIG-Zl's, air defense equipment, and naval vessels. However, Net0
has not yet allowed the Soviets to e stablish bases in Angola. Cuba
as of the spring of 1978, had 23-25,000 troops in Angola and
literally placed Neto in power after the abortive coup of May 1977
troops have also been crucial supports of Neto's regime in the con
tinuing war against UNITA. Ho wever, the Cubans, Soviets, and East
Germans are unpopular with Angolans who regard them as racists.
According to Father Gottfried de Kinderen, who recently toured
Angola Cuban Their /the Cubans'7 occupation policy is similar to
that of thewSoviets in-East Europe after the "liberation; I They
are dismantling useable industrial installations and transporting
them to Cuba Freedom at Issue, March April 1978, p. 15 In 1977,
according to Fr. de Kinderen, Angola had to use its entire coffee
and sugar harvest'to pay for Cuban and Soviet arms.
In 1978, an armed force invaded Zaire's province .of Shaba (Katanga
and seized the mining town of Kolwezi. President Carter publicly 7
accused the Cubans in Angola of training and supporting the
invasion forces, though consid erable controversy developed when
the President was unable to offer persuasive evidence of their
support.
Newsweek's senior editor, Arnaud de Borchgrave, interviewed
prisoners of war in Shaba province who admitted that Cubans and
Portuguese communists had trained and supported them about 60
percent of the world's cobalt, a necessary metal for the production
of high grade steel, and contains 36 percent of known free world
reserves. Prior to the invasion of Shaba province, the Soviet
government had been pur c hasing massive quantities of cobalt at
unusually high prices during and after the invasion invasion of
Shaba province However, Shaba province produces Cobalt production
was temporarily halted In May 1978, Angola supported another In
June 1978, Secretary o f State Cyrus Vance aMdWced that the He
omitted refer- U.S. would seek to improve relations with Angola
ences to the President's earlier accusations of Cuban involvement
in the Shaba invasion, and Donald F Henry of the U.S. delegation to
the UN, was dispat c hed as a special envoy to Angola
motivationsofthis new policy were to seek a reduction in Eastern
Bloc aid to Angola, to stabilize relations between Angola'and its
neighbors, and to protect oil production on the Angolan coast was
said to be eager to devel o p closer ties to the West to adid
dependence on the Soviets. He began exploring new relationships
with Poztugal, France, and other Western states. The U.S. has sig
nificant business ties to Angola through the Gulf Oil Corporation
the Boeing Corporation (w h ich has sold commercial jets and air
traf fic. control systems Mobil Oil, Texaco, Cities Service, and
National Cash Register of Angolan international economic
transactions. The Cabinda facili ties of Gulf Oil, threatened by
the FLEC insurgency, are guarde d by Cuban troops The apparent Net0
Morgan Guaranty Trust has explored the financing Despite its own
internal instability, Angola has interfered in the affairs of Zaire
(e.g the Shaba invasion South Africa (open support for SWAPO in
Namibia, though Net0 ha s recently acted as a restraint on SWAPO
forces due to his desire to stop South African and Zairean aid to
UNITA and FNIA and Rhodesia (the Patriotic Front main tains
training camps in Angola, from which its terrorists and guerrillas
are moved to Zambia fo r deployment against the Rhodesian
population 3 2.
No. 5 (19781, pp. 98 and 104, for the Cuban involvement in Angola.
See ~obert MOSS on standing UP to the Russians' in Africa policy
Review 3. For Namibia and SUAPO, see Jeffrey B. Gayner Namibia:
South Af rica, SWAPO and the Settlement Heritage Backgrounder No.
64, October 20, 1978 8 In July 1978, Angolan Foreign Minister Paulo
Jorge was inter In response to the question So viewed by a French
news service majority rule' does not mean much to you Jorge resp o
nded It is revolutionary movements which we regard as impor tant.
We support any movement in any country and con sider that its main
aim is to seize power. Once we recognized that the Patriotic Front
in Zimbabwe, SWAP0 in Namibia and the National Council i n South
Africa were the true representatives of their respective peoples,
the only problem was how these revolutionary organizations could
seize power that is all. This view is held by all the Ufrontline"
states FBIS July 12, 1978, p. 4 BOTSWANA J POLitie al' B'ackqm-uhd:
Botswana, formerly the British Protec torate of Bechuanaland,
became independent as a republic in' 1966.
Unlike the other four frontline states 0- and almoit unlike any
other government in Africa 0- Botswana has been a multi-party
democrac y since independence. The majority party is the Botswana
Democratic Party (BDP led by Oxford-educated Sir Seretse Khama. The
BDP won 80 percentof the popular vote in the first elections in
1965 and took 28 of 31 seats in the National Assembly. Opposition p
arties are the Botswana People's Party (BPP) and the Botswana
Independence Party (BIP) espousing social democratic platforms, and
the Botswana National Front (BNF a; Marxist party that is the major
opposition force. Freedom House places Botswana in the se c ond
category for political rights and the third category for civil
liberties. The media of communications are government owned but
there is no censor ship The political capability of Botswana has
been disturbed by the continuing war in neighboring Rhodesi a , by
the presence of Cuban troops in other adjacent states, and by tha
general leftward drift of African politics since the Soviet-Cuban
.ntervention. The Bots wana government denies that it provides
basaa for guerrillas opera ting in Rhodesia, but guerri lla forces
undoubtedly use Botswanan territory as sanctuaries. This has led to
occasional Rhodesian raids in Botswana on reprisal missions against
the guerrillas.
Although Botswana has maintained good relations with its small
white minority of about 5,000, President mama in 1975 admitted the
rise of anti-white sentiment. In March 1978, Botswanan troops
murdered three whites in the northern part of the country. The
arrest of one of those implicated in the murder led to student
demonstrations and clashes wit h the police in the capital of
Gaborone in September. 9 The BNF has sought to develop links with
Cuba and other Communist states, and in June the government revoked
the passports of 17 BNF members who were planning to attend a youth
conference in Cuba The g overnment charged that they planned to
receive military training in Cuba for the subversion of the
country. The increase of politi cal tensions in the area has led
Botswana to create an army for the first tine since independence.
It consists of 12-15,000 men and cost the government $20 million,
though a-U.N. survey predicted increased costs of $60 million in
the near future.
Economv: Although Botswana is the smallest of the five FLS and has
the lowest Gross Domestic Product, its per capita income in 1974 w
as higher than those of Mozambique and Tanzania (that of Mozam
bique is from pre-independence days and has undoubtedly declined
since).
Much of Botswana is composed of the Kalahari desert in the west and
the Okavango swamps in the north. The per capita ar able land is
2.1 acres, though this compares favorably with other FLS and with
Rhodesia. The major industry is meat exports, but U.S. and South
African development of diamond mines at Arapa and other minerals
including copper and manganese have provided $ 130 million invest
ment.
South Pifrica, and labor migration is permitted. The government has
not pressed for nationalization and controls only 15 percent of the
diamond, coppernicke1,productiOn The Botswanan economy has been
closely linked to that of Inter national Posture: Botswana is
land-locked between Rhode.sia and South Africa, and thus its
foreign policy, like its economy, has been largely dependent on
these two white-ruled states.
Rhodesia accuses Botswana of harboring guerrilla forces, but other
African states have accused her of not doing enough to promote the
liberation struggle" in Rhodesia MOZAMBIQUE Political Backgrolirid:
Mozambique, like Angola, was settled by the Portugues e in the 16th
century and became a formal colony in 1884 In 1952 it was
incorporated fully into the Portuguese state. In I967 the Front for
the Liberation of Mozambique (FRELIMO) was founded in Dar es Salaam
by Eduardo mndlane. After Mondlane's death in 19 69, leadership
fell to Samora Machel, who became head of state in 19
74. FRELIMO engaged in acts of terrorism and guerrilla warfare
prior to establishing an independent state on the voluntary
withdrawal of Portugal nization and some resisted through their own
short-lived effort at Many white Portuguese settlers objected to
the decolo 10 establishing a separate state. However, Machel's
movement soon be came dominant. From its early days, FRELIMO was
close to the Soviet Union, and Machel has shown himself to be a
full-fledged Marxist since taking power adapted to African
conditions Afrocommunism and insists that it is pure "scientific
socialism i.e Marxism-Leninism FRELIMO he has declared, is a
"democratic revolutionary dictatorship" which will be the vanguar d
of the dictatorship of the proletariat should be notedhowever, that
Machel is a former hospital orderly and far less educated or
knowledgeable of Marxism than his Angolan counterpart, Agostinho
Neto He has denied that his Marxism is peculiarly It Unlike A
ngola, Mozambique has not until recently had major pro blems with
resistance movements, though so= opposition existed from the first.
The main reason for the lack of opposition appears to be that
Machel has massively suppressed potential opposition. In th e first
six monthsof his rule, Machel crushed a revolt of about 400 rebels
from FRELLVO- He established his secret police, the People's
National Security Service (SNASP) which makes use of some Portu
guese fascists and Nazi sympathizers. He created "dynami sation
committees" for psychiatric reconditioning of the "colonial
mentality."
These committees are frequently purged of corrupt elements through
the use of government informants who are then promoted to replace
those expelled. Machel also sought to end pr ostitution, but any
woman who lived alone was liable to be classed as a prostitute and
subjected to "re-education According to the New York Times, FRELIMO
theorists say The first step..,is to eliminate all other centers of
power in Mozambique July 2, 1975 , p. 4) in order to control the
country and transform the society sne -U.S visitor J'-Douglas
White, was imprisoned without charge: and forbidden to contact US.
He'a 75- pFisE--khi-at--em the other prisoners had been arrested
and tortured so that the gov e rnment could seize their property
and find out if they had more wealth.
Portuguese or Asians Sow had beeg-i-n Prison fo-r--2l_mnn
s gashinu ton Post, August 14, 1977, p. B2 Machel has established
FRELIMO as the only legal party. All candidates must be nom inated
by FRELIMO. Elections were held in 1977 under tight FRELIMO
control. Broadcasting is also government controlled. Machel stated
in September 1977 that the press should be "an instrument of the
broad masses of the people and as their vanguard, an off ensive
instrument It should seek to liquidate .liberalism, individualism"
and enforce Party supremacy.
Independent trade unions are being destroyed by state controlled
ones: private lawyers are forbidden; and religions (especially the
Jehovah's Witnesses) are persecuted systematically. There is forced
re-settlement, and emigration is restricted. About 100,000 persons
are estiptated to be prisoners in concentration camps. SNASP,
directly under Machel's control, has incarcerated more political
prisoners than there were under the Portuguese. Freedom House
places Mozambique in the "least free" category, seventh in both
political and civil lib erties for both 1978- and 1979. diploma* or
friends' ih Mozambique Most of the prisoners were blacks and only-a
handful w ere I I 11 In late 1978 a serious armed resistance
movement against FRE LIMO began. This movement, organized as the
National Mozambican Resistance RNM is composed of- FFtELIMO
defectors. According to 21 year-old Lacerda Ceatano, a former
commanding office r in the FRELIIO army and now a member of the
RNM, Mozambique is training Rhodesians, Malawians, Swazis, Kenyans,
and other Africans for guerrilla warfare in their own countries
There they receive military training and communist in doctrination
and are lat e r sent back to their countries to foment uprisings
against their governments Machel I s ambition is to turn. the
African continent into a con tinent of communist states against the
will of the peoples of those countries To The Point, January 19,
1979, p. 3 7 Economv: Like Angola, Mozambique's economic problems
derive from Virtually all major industries have been completely it
Marxist ideology and the emigration of 260,000 of the 270,000
whites who had lived 1 this country prior to 1975 fled the country
nati onalized without compensation 1978, Mozambique will need to
import at least 192,000 tons of food stuffs in 1978 and 386,000
tons in 19
79. Prior to independence Mozambique had been an agricultural
exporter. It will be virtually impossible for the country t o
import this amount without major inter national assistance. In
1978, the government had an estimated accu mulated debt cis $171.3
million and a balance of payments deficit of 185 million in 19
77. The response of Machel to his country's eco nomic proble ms has
been to blame them on floods and Rhodesian in cursions, Floods,
however, caused little damage under Portuguese rule, and the GNP
expanded from an. annual 4.2 percent in 1967 to 9 5 percent in 19
71. Mozambique. lacks the natural resources that enrich some other
south African countries, but still has great agri cultural
potential. The country is reportedly considering joining the World
Bank and other Western international financial groups.
Despite Mozambique's official policy of opposing apartheid, its
foreign exchange has been largely derived from South Africa itself
through the wages earned in South Africa by 100,000 Mozambicans.
The closure of its borders with Rhodesia in 1976 cost Mozambique
about $200 million per year. In 1928, the Portuguese g o vernment
con- cluded an agreement with South Africa whereby 60 percent of
the wages earned by migrant workers in South Africa would be paid
in gold. The Mozambique government then bought the gold from them
with its own currency. This arrangemeht still con t inues today,
though the Mazam- bican currency received by the workers for their
gold, is now worth The black elite also According to a UN report Qf
July less, (See TO The Point,-October 13, 1978, p. 45) Machel
receives 115 million per year through this ar r angement. 12 One
example of the disastrous economic policies of Machel's government
is the ruin of the Sena Sugar Estates, which was British owned and
provided most of Mozambique's exports of sugar, its thizd largest
currency earning export. After indepen dence, the workers on the
Estates demanded and received higher wages, and absenteeism became
a serious problem, Crime rates in the surrounding areas rose
dramatically and forced an exodus of skilled white personnel.
According to FRELIMO itself, one plantat ion recently showed a rate
of wilted sugar cane of 70 percent and the ruin of the soil. In
1974, the last year of Portuguese rule, SSE profits were close to 5
million. At the present time, SSE has a debt of $50 million.
The response of the government to S SE's problems has been to
accuse the two-British managers of SSE with "premeditated economic
sabotage a crime punishable by solitary confinement in an East
German-run prison International Fos'tee: FRELIMO was originally
sponsored by Com munist China, but has abandoned the PRC in favor
of the Soviet Union and her satellites. At present, there are
estimated to be 1,000 Cuban military personnel in Mozambique, up
froxu 500 in June 1978.
Machel has concluded several treaties with the states of the Soviet
bloc. These treaties include (a) a fishing agreement with the
U.S.S.R.r by which the Soviets keep 75 percent of the catch and Mo
zambique keeps only 25 percent, and the U.S.StR. pays no royalties
for its fishing rights, unlike most other nations; (b) agreements
with other Eastern Bloc states by which Mozambique receives
machinery and vehicles in return for agricultural produce (Much of
this machinery is unsuited to the tropical climate of the country
and breaks down soon after it is put in use. Much of the milit a ry
equip ment received is obsolete c) a Friendship Treaty with the
Soviet Union, signed in March 1977, when President Podgorny of the
Soviet Union and other high ranking Soviets toured Africa, which
resembles similar treaties between the U.S.S.R. and Viet n am,
Ethiopia, Afghani stan, and Angola. It provides.for expansion of
economic, technolo gical, scientific, and cultural contacts between
the U.S.S.R. and Mozambique, for the "development of national
cadres i.e ideolo gical training for the joint adherence ' of
FRELIMO and the CPSU to "proletarian internationalism i.e that
aspect of Soviet Marxism-Leninism that asserts that the defense of
the U.S.S.R. is to be given priority for other Communist Parties
and to Marxism Leninism. The treaty also forbids any alli a nce by
either state that is aimed at the other partner, provides for
future military cooperation, and for consultations in the event of
situations that threaten or break the peace, and for mutual
cooperation with other peaceful states" in the struggle for
"freedom, independence sovereignty and social progress" (i.e for
coo
eration in the in ter national direction of the subversion of other
states). I I 13 Mozambique's relations with the U.S. have been
confined largely to economic contacts Machel met with President
Carter in New York in October 1977, and with U.S. businessmen to
encourage investm e nts and trade, but this led to 1ittIe new U.S.
economic involvement The U.S. has given Mozambique about $20
million in foreign assis tance since independence; this is largely
confined to food assis tance, and the International Security
Assistance Act of 1 9 77 spe cifically forbids funds appropriated
under the Act being expended for direct assistance to Mozambique or
Angola. However the same Act provides $45 million for refugee
assistance in southern Africa The Carter Administration contends
that the languag e of the Act pezmits U.S. assistance to Mozambique
for refugee assistance.
Mozambique has been one of the principal sponsors of the guerrilla
war against Rhodesia. It provides sanctuaries and training bases
for the Zimbabwe African National Union of Robert Mugabe, a
self-proclaimed Marxist, and the more radical section of the Patrio
tic Front. Rhodesia h.as conducted punitive incursions and air
attacks against ZANU forces and bases in Mozambique. ZANU receives
am and training from Cuban advisers in Mozambi q ue TANZANIA
Tanzania consists of Tanganyika, Zanzibar and the island of Pemba
The. former was a German colony until World War I and was occupied
by the British as a League of Nations mandate thereafter. Zanzibar
and Pemba islands in the Indian Ocean were placed under British
protection by the Sultan of Zanzibar in 18
90. Zanzibar became independent in 1963, as did Tanganyika in 19
61. In 1964 they combined as the United Republic of Tanzania.
Julius Re Nyerere of the Tanganyika National Union (TANU) be ca me
President of Tanganyika in 1962 and remains so today. In Zan zibar,
African nationalists overthrew the Arab-dominated sultanate little
over a month after independence. The Africans established a
People's Republic under the leadership of Abeid A. Karume of the
Afro-Shirazi Party (ASP Nyerere appealed to Zanzibar to unify with
Tanganyika and the unification took place in October 19
64. A popular election led to an overwhelming victory for Nyerere
as President of both countries. Karume was assassinated in 1972,
and in 1977, the ASP and TANU merged to form the Revolutionary
Party of Tanzania (CCM The CCM is the official party in an
officially one-party state. Only individuals nominated by the.CCM
may contest elections, in which it is forbidden to discuss is s ues
in the campaign. The media are owned by the government and strikes
are illegal. location of the population of the cities has been an
important aspect of the government's policy of economic development
Forced re According to 14 Freedom in The World4 th ere were 2-3000
political prisoners in 1977 and "torture and killing by the
security services appeared to be conkin, although there has been an
attempt to control the excesses of the security forces."
Tanzania in the sixth category for political rights and civil lib
erties the "not free" category slightly higher than Angola and
Mozambique but lower than Botswana and Rhodesia in civil liber
ties. According to the U.S. State Department In contrast to its
stance on violations of human rights in other countrie s , Tanzania
tends to ignore, or at best to justify in the interests of state
security, most domestic violations of human rights In 1977 and 1978
Freedom House placed E'c'ollo,my The economic policyof Tanzania has
flowed almost en tirely krom Nyerere's pape r , Ujamaa-The Basis of
African Socialism. U'amaa is a Swahili word which means roughly
harmony or "a condition 11 e that of the family In Nyerere's
thought this state is character istic of Africansocietyandis
anon-Marxistversion of socialism. Unlike Marxis m , it emphaizes
consensus and community rather .than struggle and class conflict.
In accordance with this ideology, Nyerere has departed from mst
socialist doctrine by trying to develop rural collective
settlements rather than urban development. Moreover, h e has been
particularly concerned with inequality between rural and urban, but
also between different strata of urban society and between the
Third World and the industrialized world. Consequently, he has
sought to redistribute wealth and economic rewards within Tanzanian
society.
I The results of these ideological experiments have been disastrous
for the Tanzanian economy and Nyerere has himself engaged in pro-
tracted self-criticism. When Tanzania achieved independence,
Nyerere promised that the country would achieve more in the next
ten years than in the past 40 years of colonial rule. About 13
million peasants are now said to live in communal villages, though
in 1973 the govern ment claimed only 2 million lived in them. The
11 million who have moved we r e forced to do. so though Nyerere.
has denied this cultural productivity fell during the transition
period while the Agri population increased, and aurfcul-ture
absorbed more resogrses than ever before at 30 .d-llion in 1976
compared to 3.1 million in 196 7 Out of a population of 15 million,
only 500,000 persons not on the collective farms are in paid
employment. In 1975, Tanzania had an urban unemployment rate of 17
percent. The movement for forced egalitarianism has had the effect
of punitive taxation for pro fessionals and the prohibition of
civil servants from engaging in any form of business. Nyerere has
also engaged in massive nationali zation of production. Tahzania in
1974 (the last year for which figures are available) had the lowest
per capita inco m e of all the FLS an'd Rhodesia, the-lowest life
expectancy at birth, the second lowest ratio of The government now
controls virtually all the major means 4. Raymod' D. Gastil et
al.,Freedom in the .World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties
1978 (Boston 6 New York: G. IC. Hall and Company, and Freedom
House, 1978) p. 310 15 population per hospital bed, and the third
lowest literacy rate Since this ranking predates the civil war in
Angola, the disruptive insurgency in Rhodesia, and the Marxist
regime in Mo z ambique, they may no longer be valid. But it should
be recalled that Nyerere's regime has not been oppressive or
corrupt on the same scale that Angola and Mozambique have been, nor
has it had the experience of civil war and insurgency movements as
Angola a nd Rhodesia have above ranking came after 13 years of
independence and are in,compari son to the colonial regimes in
Angola and Mozambique. In short Tanzania's economic crises cannot
be blamed on tyranny, internal violence, corruption, international
discr i mination, or the colonial legacy. They are the result only
of the ideological persuasions of its leadership The International
Relations: Nyerere has been one of the strongest critics of both
the white minority regimes of Rhodesia and South Africa as well as
of the dictatorial regime of Idi Amin in Uganda.
Tanzania has also had strained relations with Malawi because of bor
der and territorial disputes. Tanzania is an influential member of
the U.N the OAU, and, until its dissolution in 1977, the East Afri
ca Community with Kenya and Uganda. In October 1978, war broke out
between Tanzania and Uganda when the latter country invaded
Tanzania and occupied an area of 700 square miles in the Kagera
district in northern Tanzania. Uganda had an army of 20,000 men wi
t h 35 Soviet tanks and over 30 Soviek MIGS. Tanzania, having
relied on the PRC I until recently, had an army of 17,000 with 33
Chinese MIGs, but had also reportedly received in 1978 24 Soviet
MIGs and an unknown number 1 of SAM missiles. Neither the Soviet
Union, which has ties to both countries, nor the OAU, which
condemns all border changes in Africa condemned the Ugandan
invasion and reduced its hard currency holdings to $50-60 million.
It has severely undermined Tanzania's ability to pay for imports,
wh ich was already weak. Nyerere has stated that the war was
costing his coun try $1 million per day. However, Ugandan reverses
in the war appeared to be destroying the rule of Idi Amin at the
most recent report.
As the first African President to visit President Carter, Nyerere
was considered one of the President's strongest supporters in
Africa.
However, in June 1978, Nyerere denounced Western intervention in
Africa and criticized Carter specifically for listening to
"hysterical voices" protesting the Cuban presence in Africa.
Nyerere also de fended the Soviet and Cuban role in Africa. He
accused Carter of caring only "about confrontation with the Soviet
Union and defense of capitalism in Africa Washington Post, June 9,
1978, p. 1 In a recent interview in th e Washington Post (February
25, 1979 p. BZ Nyerere reaffirmed hi% support for Soviet and Cuban
interven tion I The war hurt the Tanzanian economy 16 for those
Africans who feel they need to enlarge the-'ir areas of freedom
their problem is not the Soviet U n ion Their problem is Western
Europe These remarks show a move away from support for the U.S. and
toward the Soviets and their supporters in southern Africa.
Although Communist China has provided considerable aid to Tanzania,
including the building of the T anzam Railway that linked Zambian
copper mines to the port of Dar es Salaam 1200 miles away, Nyerere
has abandoned China for the Soviet orbit. In 1977 Tanznia had 1,000
Chinese eco nomic technicians and only 365 Cuban and Soviet ones,
and recently it appe a rs to have received arms from Libya,
formerly a close sup porter of Amin who has received arms from
Iraq. werere's defense of the Soviet hvoluement in Africa and his
acceptance of arms from the Soviet Union indicates a closer
reapprochement with the Sovie ts at the expense of China
notwithstanding Chinese economic aid ZAMBIA I Political Background:
Zambia is the former British colony of Northern Rhodesia and became
independent in 19
64. Kenneth D. Kaunda became President in 1964 as leader of the
United Nati onal'Indepen dence Party (UNIP). Kaunda won elections
as President in 1964 and 1968, but in 1972 issued a law declaring
Zambia a "one-party par ticipatory democracy" with UNIP as the sole
legal party. A new con stitution later in the year confirmed this.
In 1973 Kaunda was again easily re-elected for a five year term,
though the new consti tution stipulates that only the president of
UNIP is eligible for the Presidency and only 39 percent of the
eligible electorate voted.
The President has an absolute veto over all legislation passed.by
the National Assembly (all of whose members must be members of
UNIP).
The President also appoints the Secretary-General of UNIP (the
second highest ranking official in the country the Prime Ministe r,
dl1 Cabinet officials, and all judges The official transition to a
one-party state was precipitated by the rise of political
opposition to-Kaunda in 1971 a new party, the United Progressive
Party,was formed, and a Cabinet minister, Simon Kapwepwe, resi g
ned to lead it. In late 1971 and early 1972, however, Kaunda's
secret police arrested over 200 members of the UPP, including
Kapwepwe. Amnesty International has reported that these prisoners
were subjected to torture in the form of beatings, strippings, a n
d electro-shock, and leaders of the UPP showed signs of having been
severely beaten occurred due to interrogation on the membership and
nature of the UPP. While these prisoners were interned, Kaunda
proceeded to the suppression of opposition and the creat ion of the
one-party state.
In 1978, Kaunda was again re-elected for a five year term, though
again he was the only candiaate. Certain changes were introduced in
the legal requirements for candidacy that brought the Presidency
even more under the control o f UNIP was to undercut any possible
challenge to Kaunda from Kapwepwe, who In that year The torture The
reason for these reforms I 17 'I had been released after adoption
of the new cc3stitution in 1973 In 1976' Kaunda allowed Kapwepwe
and four other oppon ents to join UNIP, thus making them
technically eligible for the Presidency in 19
78. However, at the Mulungushi party conference in October, the
rules were changed to forbid his candidacy. It is now required that
an aspirant candidate have the support of 20 delegates from each
province of the country and that he has been a dues-paying member
of UNIP for three years (thus automatically excluding Kapwepwe and
his. colleagues All private newspapers in Zambia have been placed
under govern ment control in 1975 , and the government also
controls the radio and TV networks effect in Zambia, and some 200
.political prisoners are ourently incarcerated detention of
individuals, and habeas corpus does not apply to presidential
detainees According to the State Departmen t 's Report on Human
Rights Practices in Countries Receiving U.S. Aid (1979 Since 1964,
a state of emergency has been in Under the state of emergency the
President may order The President's detention powers have been used
in recent years against political o p ponents, Rhodesian
nationalists and dissident Namibians comnion cri minals, striking
university students and professors and violators of currency
control regulations p. 201 Freedom House in 1979 ranked Zambia in
the "partly free" cate gory With a rathg of five in both political
rights and civil liber ties a I- bc0n.m In 1973 Zambia produced the
followingpercentages of free world minerals: Zinc, 1 percent; Lead,
1 percent; Cobalt, 9 percent; Beryllium, 8.5 percent; and'copper,
12 percent 18 percent of the f r ee world reserves of cobalt and 8
percent of free world reserves of copper and selenium prices in
1975 hurt the Zambian economy and forced adoption of an austerity
program with an estimated annual growth rate in gross domestic
product of 13 percent. By 19 7 8, however, copper production and
exports had declined to their lowest point in ten years. Although
Zambia has one of the most arable land surfaces in southern Africa
(40 percent only about 5 percent of its land is agriculturally
developed of its agricult ural produce is the work of the
approximately 300 white farmers who are former colonists the
cattle, 90'percent of the pigs, 65 percent of the fruits and
vegetables, and 99 percent of the wheat.
Zambia in 1964, the population has declined to 44,000 Fifty-o ne
per cent of its copper production in the Anglo-American Corporation
and It contained The fall in world copper From 1965 to 1969, the
Zambian economy advanced Most They produce 60 percent of From
75,000 whites in Zambia has engaged in massive nationaliz a tion 18
Roan Selection Trust, all privately owned land, and all private
newspapers have been taken over by the government, as have banks
and insurance companies, transporation, power, and communications
industries Part of Zambia's recent economic difficul t ies have
been caused by the closure of its borders with Rhodesia in 1973
which ended the use of Zambia's railway links with Rhodesia. This
railway carries 50 percent of Zambia's copper exports and 66 per
cent of its imports. Due to the worsening economic c onditions
Kaunda reopened this railroad in October 1978 Like Mozambique,
Zambia provides assis specifically for the forces of
theZimbabweAfrican People's Union (ZAPU) of JoshuaNkomo. Nkomo
maintains a guerrilla army of 6-8,000 men with 12 training camps, m
ainly in Angola, but with forward bases ZAPU attacks on Rhodesia
and his reliance on the Cubans for fears of Rhodesian
counterattacks, but Nkomo's shooting down of a civilian airliner
and the terrorist murder of 10 of its 18 passengers on September 5,
197 8 precipitated Rhodesian raids into Zambia against ZAPU bases
he guerrillas of the Patriotic Front in Zambia-wi-w-about 75 Cuban
advisers. Kaunda has sought to moderate Kaunda wishes to preserve
his independence of the Soviet Union and its allies and for t h at
reason wishes to avoid confrontation with Rhodesia that could
strengthen ZAPU's forces in Zambia and require him to increase his
reliance on the Soviets. The Soviet ambassador in Lusaka, V-
Solodovrrikov, is considered an important strategist who helpe d
plan both Cuban intervention in the Horn of Africa and Cuban
intervention in Angola. In October 1978, other African states
criticized Kaunda for re-opening the railroad through Rhodesia to
South Africa and the Indian Ocean. The immediate reason for this d
ecision was the emergency needs of Zambian agriculture for
fertilizer imports before the November rains began and before the
election of that month. The decision marked- the end of Zambia's
closuresf its borders with Rhodesia since 1973 and indicated a ne w
division among the FLS in their policy toward Rhodesia.
On October 29, a meeting of the other leaders of the FLS was held
in Dar es Salaam at the request of Nyerere to discuss a comxtton
policy toward the war in Rhodesia. However, the meeting ended in di
smal failure as only the most moderate of the leaders, President
Khama, bothered to stay overnight the same day and Machel did not
come at all these leaders centered on Nkomo's recent talks with Ian
Smith, on a response to Rhodesian raids against the stat e s
hosting the guerrilla forces, and on Kaunda's re-opening of the
railway. The failure of the 5s to achieve agreements on a common
policy indicates their weaknesses and their need to attend to
internal problems over the external and ideological matter of R
hodesian affairs Net0 and Kaunda left The disputes amongd 1 19 The
economic distress of Zambia and Kaunda's comparatively restraining
role on the Soviet influence and terrorist action in Rhodesia led
Western leaders in the summer to extend massive economi c aid to
Zambia committed $390 million to Zambia for a three year period and
the Carter Administration prmised $100 million more. West Germany
offered $100 million and.Great Britain offered.$27 million and
large amounts of military equipment. for defensive purposes (on
condition that they would not be given to anti-Rhodesian forces In
June the World Bank promised $1 billion to Zambia over the next
three years be placed under its surveillance for that time period
Earlier in the year the International Monetar y Fund The IMF loans
were made on condition that the Zambian economy CONCLUSION The
politico-economic pattern that predominates in the Frontline States
is that governments with little support come to power through force
or because they represent the only o r ganized political move ment
in the area. Without adequate training or with preconceived
ideological opinions, these governments have embarked on social and
economic experiments with grandiose objectives of transforming
their societies. The experiments .in evitably fail to wozk and
discontent develops. The discontent takes the form of political
oppositidn usually based on tribal and religious identities, or
armed resistance.
The government then relies increasingly on force and outside
military help in order to stay in power and curtails civil and
political liberties It adopts a foreign policy- nominally based on
appeals to "African unity anti-apartheid, nationalism, or racial
appeals to disguise its own particularist base of support. While
the govern ment ma y seek Cuban and Soviet military aid, its
economic needs can be suet only by increased aid from the West (the
Communist economic relationship with these states has been largely
exploitative Western governments are understandaly reluctant to
advance economi c aid when the Frontline States show no capacity
for efficient or honest economic mangement, but the natural
resources, strategic position, and political role of these states
require some Western assistance Three principal pohts have
consistently sustained American support for the Frontline States.
However, as indicated below, the recent historical record in
Southern Africa does not sustain these contentions I 1) Economic
assistance to the FLS will improve U.S. relations With turned to
the Soviets only beca u se the U.S persisting in its "cold war"
mentality and fear of Communism, has colonial movements them and
decrease their dependence on the Soviets. The FLS have refused to
support anti- I 20 However, one of the most striking features of
recent political de velopments in Africa has been the exclusion of
the PRC from African affairs and the increased role of the Soviet
bloc nations.
This turnabout occurred despite the fact that the PRC had long been
the most generous supporter of African independence movements and
had given substantial aid to those states already independent The
following table shows Communist economic credits and grants to the
FLS from'1954 to 1977 Angola Botswana o USSR Eastern Europe (Soviet
Bloc) PRC 11 million $12 million 0 0 $3 million M o zambique 3
million $15 million 59 million Tanzania 40 million Sa.3 million
$362 million Zambia $6 million SO million $307 million Total $60
million $90 million 371 million Source: Communist Aid to Less
Developed Countries of the Free World CIA November 19 7 8, Table 4,
p.5 Only in Angola, then, did the Soviet.bloc contribute more aid
than the PRC, but.the PRC's massive economic aid has been
meanincrless for the but political linkages or advantages. In
Mozambique, for eGample, PRC gave over three times what t h e
Soviet bloc had contributed Mozambique fs now closer to the
U.S.S.R. than any other African state except perhaps Ethiopia to do
with political alignment. The FLS depend on the Soviets and Cubans
-because they-provide the.military coercion that maintains these
regimes in power and protects them from external suppprt for their
dissidents. The famine, illiteracy, and disease of their own
populations appear to be less of a concern for the leaders of the
FLS than their ability to imprison or destroy any hint o f
opposition to their power In fact, economic aid has little 2) The
U.S it is also argued, should give economic aid to the FLS because
they contain valuable natural resources necessary to the Western
economy The mineral resources of Southern Africa could b e vitally
im portant to the U.S. and European economies. However, some of the
FLS do not have such vast natural resources; Mozambique, for
instance is lacking in them. Curiously, natural resources are also
possessed by Rhodesia and South Africa, but moral i stic policies
based on a 21 concern for democracy and human rights seem to
prevail in the discus sion of these two states. While Mozambique
receives assistance from the U.S Rhodesia, much richer in such
natural resources as chromium ore, receives nothing, and the U.S.
continues to label Rhodesia an illegal regime. Presumably, the same
standards and the same balance Of realpolitik and moralistic
foreign policy should apply to Rhodesia and south Africa as well as
to the FLS, but in practice this does not See m to be the case. In
any event, it is not certain to what degree U.S. aid to the FLS
would-improve access to their natural resources There has been a
recent trend in these states ta promote U,S aid and to restore to
private corporations their facilities. T h is has come about
because of their economic dependence on such enterprises and not
because of economic assistance from the US government 3) It is
important for the U.S. to develop closer ties to the FLS in order
to promote a peaceful and stable-transition to democracy in
Rhodesia and South Africa The Carter Administration has actually
sought to do this through Ambassadors Young's and McHenry's mission
in southern Africa. However, even after U.S. overtures and offers
of economic assistance the leaders of th e FLS refused all
compromises on these questions. Even though Ian Smith and his
colleagues in the Rhodesian government offered to attend an
all-parties conference in October 1978, this was rejected by
President Kaunda, Robert Mugabe, and Joshua Nkamo. In O c tober
Mozambique reaffirmed its ?upport for sanctions against Rhodesia,
Inin as much as it has been noted that at present imperialism is
launching a campaign to rehabilitate an smith Nyerere in his recent
interview said that, What has happened is that the Patriotic Front
has been fighting an-d Smith naw realizes that he will lose that
war Washin~ton Post, p. Bl The leadership of the FLS now sees that
as long as the U.S. and Great Britain en force sanctions against
Rhodesia their forces can win through guer rilla war and terrorism
mean more to them and offer better opportunities for gaining poli
tical power than eqonomic assistance of diplomatic: conferences.
While the importance of the Frontline States requires some U.S
involvement with them, it is difficult to advocate further
financial commitment unless certain guarantees are forthcoming
conditions which U.S. legislators and policymakers might consider
are the following 1 that would result iqeconomic developments
rather than ideological experiments or the s atisfaction of
particular political groups-and sectors Once again, military power
and coercion Among the An indication that the recipient states will
undertake policies 2 terrorist operations against.other countries,
such as Rhodesia and Namibia for furth e r destabilization of
southern Africa A commitment that the economic assistpnce will not
be used for I 22 3) An agreement to respect existing borders and
internal arrange ments in other African states. I 4 stabilize their
relations with internal political m ovements, improve tfieir
records on human rights observations, and control corruption in
their governments A serious undertaking by the recipients that they
seek to 5) A decrease in thefr reliance on or cooperation with the
Soviet Union Cuba, East Germany , and other Communist states I I 6)
An agreement to permit Western or international supervision of at
least those sectors of the economy in which Western investments or
loans are involved and a commitment to the security of these
investments from nationali z ation or harmful regulation States as
the continuations of Western "imperialism. I' However the FLS
leaders should be aware that their countries have serious economic
and political crises, and that continuation of their present
policies will only worsen t h eir internal problems, drive
their-Western friends out of Africa, dd lead to further reliance on
the Soviets The Frontline States need Western assistance more than
the West needs 1 them, regardless of their importance, and the
Western states must have som e assvance of change before they renew
their economic and political commitments to them I Such conditions,
of course, would be resisted by the Frontline I I I Samuel T.
Francis Policy Analyst