July 27, 2011
By Lachlan Markay
A former special agent from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms told a House committee that the agency had, in fact, allowed firearms bought in the United States to be transported to Mexico, in the hope that “we could further the investigation” against Mexican drug cartels.
The admission came during a line of questioning from Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) at today’s House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on ATF’s Fast and Furious operation. William Newell, the former head of ATF’s Phoenix Field Division and a key player in the implementation of Fast and Furious, repeatedly insisted throughout the hearing that the ATF “did not let guns walk” (meaning that it did not allow them to be transported into Mexico).
Chaffetz produced a January 2010 memo from Newell’s office, which stated that “our strategy is to allow the transfer of firearms to continue to take place … in order to further the investigation and allow for the identification of additional co-conspirators who would continue to operate and illegally traffic firearms to Mexican [Drug Trafficking Organizations].”
Asked how that passage squared with his denials, Newell essentially reiterated the sentiment expressed in the memo. “Our efforts to allow the transfer to identify additional co-conspirators was so that we could further the investigation [and] take out the whole organization,” he told Chaffetz.
So the ATF did “allow the transfer” of firearms into Mexico, according to Newell, in an effort “to disrupt and dismantle the entire organization.”
That claim supports testimony given by others involved in the Fast and Furious investigation. ATF agent John Dodson told the committee last month, “my supervisors directed me and my colleagues not to make any stop or arrest, but rather to keep the straw purchaser under surveillance while allowing the guns to walk.”
“Allowing loads of weapons that we knew to be destined for criminals, this was the plan,” Dodson claimed. “It was so mandated.”
Newell also confirmed that officials at three other federal agencies – the Internal Revenue Service, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (a division of the Department of Homeland Security), and the Drug Enforcement Administration – aided in devising the Fast and Furious strategy. That strategy, again, included gun walking, according to Newell’s tacit admission and other evidence obtained in the investigation.
Rep. Pat Meehan (R-PA) asked whether the three agencies, which Newell called “full partners in this case,” were “aware that guns were being walked to Mexico?”
“Sir, again, I’m assuming – I mean, I know they were aware of the strategy,” Newell replied.
Lachlan Markay is a staff writer at The Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in Opposing Views
Protect America Initiative of the Leadership for America Campaign
Read More >>
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2013, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973