Sound New Advice from the Agency for International Development


Sound New Advice from the Agency for International Development

March 17, 1988 3 min read Download Report
Edward L.

(Archived document, may contain errors)

3/17/88 191


Alan Woods, the new Administrat or of America's primar'y foreign aid agency, the Agency for International Development (AID), recently submitted his first annual report to Congress. In it he observes that, because of ill-conceived economic and social policies, the governments of less dev e loped countries (LDCs) often are more responsible than anything else for continuing poverty in their countries. Woods explains that stressing to these countries the importance of free markets is the best means of achieving economic-growth and prosperity. T he Woods testimony is as welcome as it is correct.: His candor contrasts greatly with what have been the standard operating procedures of the AID bureaucracy and the programs that it administers. Woods's challenge therefore is to make certain that his AID employees and AID- funded organizations promote the market-based policies that he calls for in his report. Con- gress needs to back Woods's efforts by rewriting AIVs policy mandate to emphasize the need for more U.S. aid programs to promote long-term, gro wth-oriented economic policies.

Since the end of World War II, the United States has recognized that worldwide prosperity serves America's economic, political, and moral interest as well as benefitting the citizens of the LDCs. Economically healthy countri es not only have higher living standards but are more politically secure, less susceptible to communist subversion, and potential customers for U.S. exports. Yet in recent decades, many recipients of U.S. aid have stagnated or. actually grown poorer.

Disc redited Theories. A key reason for this failure of AID is thatAIED's mandate is based on discredited theories of economic development policy. These theories see national governments as the engine of economic growth. In 1973, for example, Congress rewrote A ID's authorizing legislation to stipulate that "development. planning must be the responsibility of each sovereign nation." The 1973 rewrite also directed AID to focus on the "poorest of the poor" to meet such basic human needs as food and medical attenti o n. While such aims are laudable, they prompted AID to funnel aid money through the public sector of the recipient country. The result: Independent private entrepreneurship and the: private provision of food and health ser- vices were discouraged. Economic and social progress thereby was constrained.

Thanks to this congressionally imposed philosophy of development, AID has supported in- creased government intervention in the economies of many foreign countries. Example: In El Salvador, AID recently financed several extensions of state control, including the creation of a government monopoly for marketing coffee. Example: In many cases direct U.S. food aid to

LDCs lowers the prices that farmers receive for their crops, thus creating a disincentive for them to increase output. By contrast, one study found that only about 4.5 percent of AID ex- penditures go to the private sector.

Promoting Entrepreneurship. Woo ds is correct when he notes that the governments are responsible for the bleak prospects of most poor countries and that -as such only governments can reform their systems. He recommends that in countries with active private sectors, govern- ments should p romote rather than restrain entrepreneurship by transferring state-owned in- dustries to private hands. He cautions, however, that such privatization will not work if governments continue to over-regulate the economy and penalize productive business activ ity.

Woods now must ensure that AID officials actively promote growth-oriented, non-statist economic policies. He must appoint key administrators to execute'such policies. Since AID carries out many programs by contracting with private voluntary organizati ons, Woods also must see to it that these groups are selected according to their ability to fulfill AID's new policy. Of special importance is the need to fund private groups in LDCs that study and dis- pense information concerning free market reforms. Co ngress also should back Woods's efforts by rewriting AID's legislative mandate to give clear priority to long@term, growth-oriented economic programs.

Correcting Past Errors. AID's new Administrator is making an important effort to correct his agency's pas t errors. Anti-free market policies, combined with an overemphasis on meeting basic human needs - an understandable but insufficient strategy - actually has undermined economic growth and led to stagnant or even falling living conditions. The U.S. has a m oral, economic and political interest in worldwide economic growth. Congress and the Administra- tion should push ahead with efforts to make AID a more effective cure for worldwide poverty.

Edward L Hudgins, Ph.D. Director Center for International Economic Growth

F or further information:

"Statement of the Administrator," Congressional Presentation, Fiscal 1989, Agencyfor Intemational Development, main volume, pp. 1-19. Peter F. Schaefer, "Seven Steps to Improve U.S. Bilateral Foreigii Trade," Heritage Fou ndation Backgounder No. 599, August 19,1987.



Edward L.