Executive Summary: Washington must pressure Syria on other issues, limit pressuring Israel

Report Middle East

Executive Summary: Washington must pressure Syria on other issues, limit pressuring Israel

February 4, 2000 3 min read Download Report
Senior Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation
James Phillips is a senior research fellow for Middle Eastern affairs at The Heritage Foundation.

The Syrian-Israeli peace negotiations, currently frozen because of a procedural impasse and continued terrorist attacks against Israel, offer Washington a chance to end the state of war between Israel and its most dangerous neighbor. But this opportunity is fraught with risks for both Israel and the United States.

Syrian President Hafez al-Assad demands the unconditional return of the Golan Heights, a strategic buffer zone that Israel has occupied since its victory in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. Israel cannot surrender such a strategic asset without numerous security conditions, some of which are unacceptable to Syria. The Clinton Administration is trying to bridge the gaps between the two sides. It has promised to deliver economic aid and security guarantees, possibly including U.S. peacekeeping troops on the Golan, as inducements for both sides to sign a peace treaty.

While helping to shape a peace settlement between Israel and Syria, Washington must be careful not to undermine its ally's long-term security. A stable peace is not possible without a strong security foundation. If Israel decides to relinquish the Golan Heights, this is its prerogative; but the United States should not pressure it to do so. Nor should it lull the Israelis to sleep about the risks of withdrawing from the Golan by providing a cosmetic U.S. peacekeeping presence that would do little to lessen Israel's security risks but would reduce the ability of U.S. armed forces to meet security challenges elsewhere.

The United States also should assert its own national interests in shaping a peace settlement by insisting that Syria actively support U.S. foreign policy goals outside of the peace process as a condition of receiving American foreign aid. Washington should not reward Damascus with foreign aid merely for signing a peace treaty that is in Syria's own interest. Syria should be required to take concrete actions to crack down systematically on all terrorists it supports, help contain Iraq, help isolate Iran, stop its support for drug smuggling and counterfeiting, and help build a stable and independent Lebanon before receiving one dollar of U.S. foreign aid.

The Clinton Administration's role in the Syrian-Israeli peace talks in the future should be conducted carefully, in accordance with the following do's and don'ts.

What Washington Should Do:

  • Work for a peace settlement that minimizes Israel's long-term security risks.

  • Help compensate Israel for the loss of the Golan Heights.

  • Require Syria to crack down systematically on terrorists.

  • Require Syria to end its strategic cooperation with Iran and halt the flow of Iranian supplies to the radical Shiite Hezbollah militia in Lebanon.

  • Require Syria to end its support for drug smuggling and counterfeiting operations in Lebanon.

  • Require Syria to assist in containing Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

  • Work to build a stable, independent Lebanon.

  • Consult with Congress before making any commitments.

What Washington Should Not Do:

  • Do not commit U.S. peacekeeping troops to the Golan Heights.

  • Do not push Israel into any settlement that it believes would undermine its security.

  • Do not rush the negotiations needlessly.

  • Do not give foreign aid to Syria merely as a reward for peace.

  • Do not give U.S. arms to Syria.

James A. Phillips is a Research Fellow specializing in Middle Eastern affairs in the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies at The Heritage Foundation.


James Phillips

Senior Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation