What Are Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits?
- States provide unemployment insurance (UI) benefits to involuntarily unemployed workers. UI benefits typically replace 35–40 percent of a worker’s weekly income.
- Normally, states provide UI benefits for up to 26 weeks. Workers in states with high unemployment rates may collect “extended benefits” for an additional 13 weeks for a total of 39 weeks. The federal government and the states normally split the cost of these extended benefits.
- Congress has modified the UI program so that workers in states with high unemployment now qualify for a maximum of 99 weeks of UI benefits—almost two years. In addition to the basic 26 weeks of UI, Congress created the Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) program, which provides benefits for an additional 34 weeks in all states. Workers in states with unemployment above 6.0 percent qualify for an additional 13 weeks of UI benefits, and workers in states with unemployment above 8.5 percent qualify for an additional six weeks of benefits on top of that. Congress also increased the extended benefits program to 20 weeks and now covers the full cost of providing them.
- Congress has maintained extended benefits temporarily and periodically votes to reauthorize them at their extended level. In the absence of congressional action, the EUC program would expire and the extended benefits would revert to 13 weeks with joint state/federal funding.
- Higher unemployment
- By reducing the need to look for new work, extended UI benefits cause some unemployed workers to take longer to find new work. Studies show that extending UI benefits to 99 weeks has increased the national unemployment rate by roughly 0.5 percentage points.
- Longer unemployment
- The consequences of extended unemployment benefits are some of the most conclusively established results in labor economic research. Extending either the amount or the duration of UI benefits increases the length of time that workers remain unemployed. UI benefits reduce the pressure to make difficult choices—such as moving or switching industries—to begin a new job.
- Economic research shows that each 13-week extension of UI benefits increases the average length of time workers receiving benefits stay unemployed by approximately one week.
- Reduces other income
- Ineffective monitoring and job search assistance
- The law requires UI recipients to actively search for work, but the government does little to enforce this requirement or assist unemployed workers in finding new jobs. This hurts workers in genuine need while allowing unscrupulous recipients to game the system.
- Congress can alleviate this problem by strengthening the job search requirements and by giving states waivers from the federal system to experiment with ways to return the unemployed to work faster.
- Ineffective stimulus
- Extended UI benefits are frequently claimed to provide significant economic stimulus.
- Unfortunately, Congress does face trade-offs with UI spending. The studies that conclude that UI benefits boost the economy ignore their effect in raising unemployment and incorrectly assume that unemployed households spend every dollar of UI benefits they receive. Empirical studies contradict both of these assumptions.
- Heritage Foundation macroeconomic modeling accounting for both these factors shows that extending UI benefits beyond nine months slightly depresses economic activity.
- Extended UI benefits are not a free lunch. Congress does not boost the economy by increasing UI spending. The arguments for extending benefits must be made on humanitarian grounds.
- Negligible wage effects
- Some analysts suggest that extended UI benefits should enable workers to find better jobs and increase their wages when they return to work.
- Other analysts suggest that workers’ skills deteriorate when they are unemployed, and by encouraging longer unemployment, extended benefits reduce workers’ wages.
- Economic research finds neither effect: Extended benefits neither increase nor decrease unemployed workers’ wages when they find new jobs.
James Sherk is Senior Policy Analyst in Labor Economics in the Center for Data Analysis at The Heritage Foundation.