January 26, 2010 | WebMemo on Budget and Spending
The new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) 10-year budget baseline provides a sobering picture of a federal government that has committed itself to trillions more in spending than taxpayers can afford. Once the baseline is scrubbed of several unrealistic assumptions that Congress demands CBO use, the more realistic baseline shows that massive spending increases are set to keep the budget deficit to $1.4 trillion in 2010 and drive it to $1.9 trillion by 2020.
A Sea of Red Ink
The CBO baseline contains two important messages. First, Washington is accumulating debt at an unsustainable rate. After the debt slowly grew to $5.8 trillion through 2008, the more realistic baseline shows the federal government adding an astonishing $16.3 trillion in new debt between 2009 and 2020—$130,000 per household over those 12 years.
Budget deficits would average $1.3 trillion annually as the debt climbs to 98 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) by 2020—and continues growing thereafter. This steep rise in debt would eventually become too large for global capital markets to absorb, potentially triggering a financial crisis, interest rate spike, and gigantic tax increases.
The second message is that surging government spending—not low revenues—is driving these deficits. Historically, spending has averaged 20.7 percent of GDP, and revenues have averaged 18.3 percent of GDP, leading to sustainable average deficit of 2.4 percent. Under the adjusted CBO baseline, 2020 spending would surge to 25.9 percent of GDP, while revenues would reach 17.6 percent (still slightly below the historical average), leaving a deficit of 8.3 percent of GDP.
This means that 88 percent of the additional deficits would come from higher spending, and only 12 percent would come from lower revenues—and that assumes all tax cuts are extended. Clearly, spending is the problem.
Thus, President Obama’s spending agenda—which would be unaffordable even in good budget times—is completely unrealistic in this sea of red ink. On top of this baseline, the President would spend trillions of dollars on a new health care plan. This cost would be partially offset by painful tax increases and deep Medicare cuts that, if enacted, would be better spent on meaningful deficit reduction. The President’s stimulus did not create 3.5 million jobs as promised, but it did add $1 trillion in new debt. The effect of these policies is to dig the fiscal hole deeper, forcing future lawmakers to choose between even larger tax increases and deeper spending cuts.
Building a Baseline
Congress requires the CBO to include in its 10-year baseline the following unrealistic assumptions: The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts and all other temporary tax cuts will expire, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will not be annually adjusted for inflation, and non-war discretionary spending will grow no faster than inflation through 2020.
Using the “alternative assumptions” section of the CBO report, this paper’s projections adjust the CBO’s baseline with the following assumptions:
Under this more realistic budget baseline, the budget deficit reaches $1.4 trillion in 2010, drops to $1.0 trillion by 2013, and rises back to 1.9 trillion by 2020.
General Budget and Spending Trends: A Look Back
General Budget and Spending Trends: Looking Forward
Deficits and Public Debt
Difficult Decisions Needed
Genuine spending reforms are the only way to bring the budget under control. Lawmakers should rescind the remaining funds from TARP and the failed stimulus bill. Next, they should enact tough spending caps to help lawmakers set priorities and make trade-offs. Then, Congress should disclose the massive unfunded obligations of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid; put those programs on long-term budgets; and create an entitlement reform commission. Finally, lawmakers should enact the necessary entitlement and programmatic reforms that can keep government within those limits.
These spending reforms may not be easy, but the alternative—record government debt and gigantic tax increases—is even worse.
Brian M. Riedl is Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation.
These figures represent the 40-year average through 2008.
Including net interest costs.
Past budget data comes from Office of Management and Budget, “Budget of the United States Government: 2009 Historical Tables,” at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/historicals/ (January 26, 2010). Future projections were calculated by The Heritage Foundation using Congressional Budget Office, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2010 to 2020,” January 2010, at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10871/01-26-Outlook.pdf (January 26, 2010).
Adjusted for inflation.
Adjusted for inflation.
For Fiscal Year (FY) 2009, President Bush is assigned in $1.186 trillion in deficit spending (the CBO estimate for FY 2009 when he left office), while the remaining $228 billion in 2009 deficit spending is attributed to President Obama.
See Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director, Congressional Budget Office, letter to Representative Paul Ryan (R–WI), June 30, 2009, at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/104xx/doc10416/RyanLetterInterestRates.pdf (January 26, 2010).
Congressional Budget Office, “The Long-Term Budget Outlook,” June 2009, Figure 1.2, at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10297/toc.html and supplemental data for Figure 1.2, at www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8877/SupplementalData.xls (January 26, 2010). This represents the alternative fiscal scenario.
See Stuart M. Butler et al., “Taking Back our Fiscal Future” Heritage Foundation White Paper, March 31, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wp0408.cfm. See also Alison Acosta Fraser, “The SAFE Commission Act (H.R. 3654) and the Long-Term Fiscal Challenge,” testimony before the Committee on the Budget, United States House of Representatives, June 25, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/tst062508b.cfm.
 For proposals, see Brian M. Riedl, “A Guide to Fixing Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 2114, March 11, 2008, at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/bg2114.cfm.