February 23, 1984

February 23, 1984 | Backgrounder on International Organizations

The.U.N. Department of Public Information: A House of Mirrors

(Archived document, may contain errors)

332 z February 23, 1984 THE U.N. DEPT. OF PUBLIC INFORMATION A HOUSE OF MIRRORS INTRODUCTION At the United Nations, the Secretariat'.s Department of Public Information has the responsibility "to promote to the greatest possible extent an in formal understanding of the work and pur oses of the United Nations among the peoples of the world to undertake "positive informational activities that will supple ment the services of the existing agencies of information,Il and specifically prohibits it f rom engaging in Ilpropaganda. Yet, just as almost all other parts of the U.N. have fallen far short of fulfilling the aspirations and meeting the goals of its founders, the Department of Public Information (DPI) has increasingly veered from its original m a ndate Its 1946 Mandate from the General Assembly calls on it Certainly, the United Nations is not the organization it was 38 years ago, and therefore the functions of DPI have evolved over the period since 1946 with the organization itself. But the purpos e s of the U.N. remain in essence unchanged: to maintain international peace and security, to reaffirm fundamental human rights, and to promote social and economic development. Although the U.N. has a poor record in progress toward.these goals, the Departme n t of Public Information portrays the U.N. as moderately successful. Where the U.N. has,not been successful, DPI, through an unbalanced and often heavily biased interpretation of events, attempts to blame the failure on the Western industrial democracies..

Such misinterpretation is' dangerous in three respects. First it creates' false hopes and expectations among nations and General Assembly Resolution 13 (I February 13, 1946 Ibid. 2 their citizens--particularly in developing countries--who look to the U.N. to represent principles of free speech, political and economic self-determination, and human rights but find that the U.N. is neither capable nor willing to fulfill these expectations. Second, by ignoring fundamental flaws and problems at the U.N DPI pre v ents the U.N. from addressing and solving these problems. Third, DPI's misrepresentation of reality significantly affects the way in which nations and their citizens view critical global issues. Like the House of Mirrors at an amusement park, DPI. distort s reality--exaggerating some things, diminishing others and obscuring most. Unlike a House of Mirrors, however, DPI's distortions form a predictable pattern. This pattern can be seen readily 0 0 0 0 0 in the follbwing aspect: of DPI's actibities The promot i on of an anti-Western, anti-free market, and anti-democratic Ifdouble standard" through biased reporting and interpretation of events, particularly on the issues of the Middle East and South Africa, through the publica tion of documents, and the media of television, radio, and cinema.

Disregard of the widespread aggression and human rights violations by the Soviet Union and its proxy states, particularly during the past five years in such places as Ethiopia, Angola, Syria, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Cambodia, and the air-space ov er the Sea of Okhotsk.

Promotion of restrictions on free speech, and particularly on freedom of the press, through active advocacy, together with the U.N. Information Committee, of the New World Information and Communication Order (NWICO).

Refusal to ackn owledge the successes of free market principles and incentives to economic development, and active support and promotion of the New International Economic Order (NIEO the U.N.'s concept of a global scheme for redistribution of income, technology and indus t rial capacity from North to South. This has been most prevalent in DPIIs hundreds of radio programs over the past year 171 in the third quarter of 1983 alone and in the DPI booklet, Towards a World Economy That Works.3 Promotion and encouragement of lobby i ng efforts by non- governmental organizations accredited to DPI in behalf of legislation before the U.S. Congress affecting either the U.N. or U.N. programs. This violates U.S. law and the sense of Congress that prevent recipients of federal funds from lo b bying Congress on legislation. One quarter of DPI's budget, of course, is funded by Congress U.N. Department of Public Information, Towards a World Economy that Works, New York, United Nations, 1980, p. 43. 3 o The successful attempt to influence the priv a te media through selective subsidies--at one point amounting to $432,000 to fifteen foreign newspapers--for supplements promoting DPI's views on aid to the developing nation o The placement, promotion, and encouragement of Soviet and Eastern bloc national s in positions of effective control or influence within DPI and the U.N. Committee on Informa- tion. The Soviets, who maintain among the most severe restrictions on the press and media in their own country, thus can tap the rich resources of the U.N.Is inf o rmation bureaucracy DPI has failed to control its budget. In the past four years alone, this budget has increased at twice the pace of the5 U.N. budget as a whole: 68.6 percent compared to 35.3 percent. The U.S. paid $10.2 million of DPIIs 1982-1983 bud e t of $40.9 million and $16.2 million of the entire budget of ? 64.6 million for the DPI Headquarters, the Geneva Information Service, and the U.N. Information Centers in that same biennium. While the growth of DPI's budget for the next biennium (1984-1985) appears under control, it is not certain that such moderation will continue.

While many of these problems are endemic to the entire United Nations system, their pr'edominance in the work of DPI may be far more damaging to the interests of the United State s and its allies--and in the long run, to the interests of the develop- ing nations of the U.N.--than even the Problems of the General Assembly and its various committees. With a staff of approximate- ly 800 operating from U.N. headquarters in New York, a n Informa- tion Service in Geneva, and from 64 U.N. Information Centers UNICs) in as many countries--from Papua, New Guinea, and Managua, Nicaragua, to Washington, D.C and Madrid, Spain--DPI reaches about 150 countries.

I, Close cooperation with almost 30 national broadcasting organizations throughout the world and almost all major news organizations allows DPI to convey the distorted image of the world that is portrayed at the United Nations--railing against violations of the human rights of Marxist Illib e ration" groups whi4e ignoring human rights violations throughout the Soviet empire, and promoting the economic development models of centrally planned economies to the exclusion of other models various bodies, agencies, committees and conferences to the w orld Whether by merely reporting on the U.N. and the work of its 4 "U.N. Gave $432,000 to the Foreign Press to Publish its Views The New York Times, May 28, 1982.

Statement by Ambassador Charles Lichenstein, Alternate U.S. Representative to the United Nati ons, in the Committee on Information, June 22, 1983 USUN 48-(83 p. 5. 4 public, or by becoming an active catalyst in the interpretation of events and circumstances, DPI furthers the Ildouble standard" of the U.N. and thus betrays the original vision of th a t organiza- tion and by openly directing and assisting the active lobbying of the U.S. Congress by private non-governmental organizations, DPI is an active player in the shaping of events outside the United Nations in a way designed to legitimize the new l lordersll envisioned by the General Assembly, UNESCO, UNIDO, UNCTAD, the Center on Transnational Corporations and others By buying influence and support from the private media DPI: FORM AND FUNCTION In 1946, the General Assembly called for the establishme n t of a IIDepartment of Public Informationi1 to Ilpromote to the great est possible extent an informed understanding of the work and purposes of the United Nations among the peoples of the world.116 To carry this out, the first General Assembly declared th a t DPI Ilshould primarily assist and rely upon the co-operation of the established governmental and non-governmental agencies of informa tion to provide the public with information about the United Nations.Il7 would not undertake the primary role in promot i ng the Ifinformed understanding1' throughout the world. Akashi, an affable former Japanese representative to the U.N who is now Undersecretary-General for Public Information. He says The General Assembly thus stipulated that the DPI This is confirmed by Y a sushi We consider, in brief, our role as supplementary to the efforts of various national and other agencies of information, althouqh, as the same resolution states, we must on our own initiative engage in "positive information activitiesi1 to the extent t hat these national and other efforts are insufficient to realize the purpose which has been stipulated.8 More recently, Akashi has taken the "supplementary" role one step further, and maintained that, because of Ilserious budgetary constraints" on DPI's b u dget and the increasing amount of new activities that DPI has had to undertake, DPI has played an increasingly Ifcatalytic rolei1 in stimulating outside media organi zations and producers to cooperate with the United Nations in Ilcoproducing information p r ograms I9 Since the General Assembly also has stipulated that DPI may not engage .in propaganda activi- ties, the challenge posed to Akashi and DPI has been to ensure that the "catalytic1I role not 'become a Ilpropagandall role. DPI s General Assembly Res olution 13 (I op. cit.

Statement of Yasushi Akashi, Undersecretary-General for Public Information Ibid to the Committee on Information, June 20, 1983, p. 5.

Ibid '9 P. 6- -I 5 record in meeting this challenge is mixed, for it has engaged in activities which differ little from traditional propaganda.

While many DPI activities understandably are tied to General Assembly resolutions, particular.ly those on the subjects of South Africa, Namibia, the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Jordan River's Wes t Bank, DPI still has considerable latitude, particularly in terms of providing balance and fairness in cover- age of a wide range of issues. In the majority of these cases, DPI lacks balance and fairness, most often through omitting facts and events and s ometimes by distorting data. For example, the. apparent refusal to consider or mention Soviet or Soviet-sponsored aggression anywhere in the world in DPI material; the manipulation of economic data to support generalized statements against trans- national corporations; the encouraging of non-governmental organi zations to lobby Congress on legislation and decisions affecting the United Nations; and the misuse of statistics on the U.S voting record at the U.N. in an attempt to show that the U.S. has not bee n lfisolated.ll These, in effect, constitute some form of propaganda.

DPI Priorities The funding for DPI programs and activities, as Undersecretary General Akashi told The Heritage Foundation, follows directly General Assembly priorities. issues outside th e Assembly's list of priorities. In this way, DPI has become a llcatalystll for promoting the General Assembly's Ildouble standard I' for politicizing technical and non-political issues, and for exacerbating tensions among member-states of the U.N. Among t he resolutions setting DPIIs agenda are those calling for "special attention" to the issues of apartheid, the work of the U.N. Council on Namibia lo colonialism, the New International Economic Order, the New World Information and Communication Order l3 an d the World Disarmament Campaign. l4 DPI cannot direct attention to DPI Activities and Publications In 1946, the General Assembly divided the functions of the DPI into seven major categories: press, publications, radio, films, graphics and exhibitions, and public liaison and reference.

DPI's Press and Publications Division (PPD) publishes a wide range of materials for various audiences throughout the world. Division personnel, when queried by The Heritage Foundation, only could guess at its output of press releases, briefing notes lo l1 l2 l3 l4 General Assembly Resolution 36/149, December 16, 1981.

General Assembly Resolution 34/95, December 13, 19.79.

General Assembly Resolution 3535 (xxx December 17, 1975.

General Assembly Resolution 34/ 182, December 18, 1979.

General Assembly Resolution 371 194, December 10, 1982. 6 round-ups, backgrounders, publications, and the frequency with which those publications are updated. The estimates are that this Division of DPI sends out approximately 11,000 press releases a year in French and English, and holds around 150 press confer- ences a year on various topics. Additionally, the Press and Publications Division releases the following periodicals, pamphlets and referenc e books on a recurring basis U.N. Chronicle, published monthly (except August). This covers the events and issues at the U.N and the U.N. system, including the 'specialized agencies Objective Justice, a quarterly which discusses human rights topics with he a vy emphasis on such issues as Namibia, apartheid, South Africa and Israel. This is published in English only and has a press run of 12,000 copies, the larger portion of which is distributed to the Information Centers and the national delegations to the U. N. There is a small number of subscribers as well.

The United Nations Yearbook, published annually in English only, with a press run oi 6,000 copies. This volume presents facts and figures on the U.N. and its member states.

Everyone's United Nations, publ ished every five years, in English only, with a press run of 2,000 copies. This publication reflects and magnifies the political biases and double standard of the U.N. system. While spending several sections of the volume on alleged human rights violation s in Namibia and South Africa, and even giving credibility to African complaints against Israel for its 1976 rescue of hostages.held by terrorists at Entebbe Airport in Uganda, the volume makes no mention of Cuban violations of the human riqhts of Ethiopia n citizens, or the thousands of Ugandan citizens who perished during the rule.of Idi Amin prior to 19

79. The most recent volume published in December 1979, devotes several pages to U.S. involvement in Vietnam from 1966 to 1975, but makes no mention of the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia begun in January 1979 Basic Facts on the United Nations, published every four years, with a press run of 30,000 in English, 15,000 in French and 15,000 in Spanish. This contains basic infor- mation on the U.N.

The United Nations Charter, published as needed. The last press run was in 1980, with 175,000 copies printed.

Imaqe and Reality: Questions and Answers About Manaqement, Finance, and People, published as needed. The most recent issue was published in 1983, with a pres s run of 100,000 in English. Between 5,000 and 10,000 were pub 7 lished in Spanish, French, Russian, German and Japanese. All' are distributed to the Information Centers, national delegations, and selected non-governmental organizations. Through a questio n and answer format, it addresses some of the "oft-repeated criticisms" of the U.N It is as unbalanced as Everyone's United Nations and other U.N. publications. Example: In answer to the question: "Are the poorer countries in the 'United Nations out to soa k the rich DPI answers No. What the poorer countries are asking for is a fairer system of international economic relations. In calling for a 'new international economic order' (NIEO in 1974, the General Assembly was aiming for the common interest of develo p ing and deve.loped countries.1115 objection to the NIEO-that it emphasizes redistribution of income rather than investment of income, and does not therefore help the developing countries which it purports to serve--but it fails to mention any of the more e xtreme and punitive economic proposals by the Group of 77 within the U.N. These include a plan to prop up world commodity prices by establishing new international price supports and a major revamping of the world trading system designed to favor developin g countries Not only does this misstate the major DPI's External Relations Division ERD) maintains relations and communications with schools, governmental and non-governmental organizations, other entities outside the U.N. system, and parti- cularly with t h e U.N. Information Centers. It sends out some 16,000 information cables each year to the Centers, and is the primary source for the some 120 "briefing notes and round-ups that go out annually to the non-governmental organizations associ- ated with DPI. Th i s Division's publications include o United Nations Today--Suggestions for Speakers. This is supposed to be published every year, but was not released in 1983, due to controversy over its lack of balance and evenhandedness on a wide range of issues in its 1 981 and 1982 editions At a U.N. dailv Dress briefina in October 1981, a reporter commented thac kuggestions f6r Speakers was "extraordinarily tendentious both in its subject matter and its choice of subjects.1116 pointed out that Afghanistan was mentioned without any reference to foreign troops in that country, and Kampuchea was discussed in three paragraphs, without any mention of Vietnam, which had invaded the country in 19

79. On the other hand, the reporter noted correctly, ten pages were devoted to th e Middle East and seventeen to southern Africa*.17 The reporter Suggestions saw little improvement in its 1982 l5 l6 l7 Ibid U.N. Department of Public Information, Image and Reality, New York October 1983, p. 18 U.N. Daily Press Briefing, October 29, 1981 , p. 3 8 edition, and, as one U.N. delegate told The Heritage Foundation, the 1983 edition was .so 'Itotally unacceptable in draft form that even DPI did not dare publish it o World Concerns and the United Nations: This comprises model teaching units tor p r imary, secondary and teacher education and is published by the Education Information Programs section of the External Relations Division. Addressing topics from disarmament and peacekeeping to the New International Economic Order and human rights in teach ing units for all grade levels, it was prepared in part by a UNESCO project and reflects the bias found in many other U.N. publications.

DPI's Division of Economic and Social Information (DESI serves as a focal point for economic and social issues and agen da within the entire U.N. system, and publishes press releases and documentation on development and economic issues. These include o o Development Forum, published monthly. It addresses Background reports on development and Third World economic issues, se n t to around 5,000 selected recipients issues and problems of economic development and allows NGOs to publish their views on development, views which strongly support the wealth redistribution goals of the New International Economic Order. The articles by t he NGOs and the DPI staff ignore the economic accomplishments of the free market countries of the developing world, such as Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, and the Ivory Coast o Towards a World Economy that Works: Questions and Answers published in 198 0 , and distributed to U.N. Intormation Centers and NGOs throughout the world, and to national delegations at the U.N world economy is not working but would work under the New International Economic Order This argues that the current DPI's Radio and Visual S ervices Division (RVS) produces ,television and radio news and information programs on U.N. and world events. in 18 languages over a two-year period, covering the daily range of U.N. activities; a daily quarter-hour. program dealing with U.N. efforts agai n st apartheid; the photographic coverage of U.N meetings; and 'Iin-depth" media information. The Division also produces its own films and has assisted various agencies, commit- tees, and centers within the U.N. to produce and distribute films In a letter t o The Heritage Foundation, Undersecretary-General Akashi emphasizes the distinction between what the U.N. Secretariat does on its own initiative based on material it prepares, on the one hand, and public information activities which are mandated sometimes i n great detail--by various bodies of the U.N., on the This division has produced some 6,200 radio programs 9 other. In the latter case, Akashi points out, there is often a consultation clause with the committee concerned, which further restricts freedom o f action by the Secretariat.

While there is some truth to this, the fact remains that DPI's material maintains the double standard through obfuscation of basic facts and by avoiding evenhandedness in addressing various issues. The lack of balance is most r eadily found in DPI's handling of the issue of economic development in Development Forum and Towards a World Economy that Works, and in its treatment ofan rights and security issues in such publications as Everyone's United Nations and Suggestion for Spea kers. When DPI works from the request or under the guidance of a U.N. Committee or agency, it often becomes an agency that publicizes and promotes the double standard.

DPI Finances DPI's two-year budget for 1982-1983 was $65.3 million, of which the United States paid $16.3 million or 25 percent. This included U.S. contributions to the U.N. Information Services in Geneva ($883,17-5 and to the 64 U.N. Information Centers ($5.4 million).

The U.S. contribution also included $4.9 million to the DPI's Radio and Visual Services Division which is responsible for, among other items, the production of radio and television news summaries which support the New International Economic Order NIEO) and New World Information and Communication Order (NWICO the integration o f women in the struggle for peace and development, and the promotion of human rights sponsored photographic or poster exhibits on !Ithe plight of the Palestinian people,Il which imply that Israel is solely responsible for the fate of the Palestinians, and thus exacerbate tensions between Israel and other member states of the U.N. The Press and Publications Division of DPI to which the U.S. contributed $2.1 million in the 1982-1983 biennium, shares these priorities.

The U.S. Congress should question continue d U.S. financial support for the information activities of the U.N. Secretariat. NWICO, for example, encourages nations to impose what would amount to censorship of Western journalistic activities and products. DPI's support of the NWICO. and NIEO most ha rms the countries in greatest need of private direct investment and a free press.

Among the proposed new projects for DPI are a short-wave radio station and a U.N. satellite communications system. The cost of the proposed satellite system i s $145 million, of which the U.S. would be forced to pay $54 million It has also displayed or I The DPI Staff The nature of DPIIs staff, and particularly the strong influence of its Soviet members, contributes to DPIIs lack of 10 balance. Former U.N. Unde r secretary-General Arkady Shevchenko, who defected to the U.S. from the Soviet Union in 1978, has pointed out that DPI plays a crucial role in the Soviet Union's disinformation campai at the U.N The whole Department is mobilized I' he said. lF The .princip al Soviet national at DPI is Anatoly Mkrtchyan, head of the External Relations Division. Shevchenko identifies Mkrtchyan as a KGB colonel in fact, Shev- chenko asserts, the post has been held by a KGB officer since 19

68. Among the divisonls main functions is the dissemination of U.N. material to the 64 U.N. Information Centers throughout the world.

Other problems with the DPI staff include under-representation of U.S. nationals on the staff.

While the U.S. pays about a quarter of DPIIs budget, U.S. citiz ens in 1982 numbered only 117 of the total 862 personnel (14 percent) at DPI and the U.N. Information Centers. Only three of nationals are posted at DPI Headquarters in New York--on a total staff of 38O2*=-the near absence of Americans in key posts within DPI, combined with the strong presence of Soviet nationals, poses many problems for the U.S. It means, for example, that the U.S can do little to prevent DPI's anti-U.S. and anti-Western bias. Congress should investigate the degree to which information is thus influenced by staffing policy at DPI. these 117 were in the highest grade of D-

1. While 105 U.S.

Non-Governmental Orqanizations (NGOs) at DPI The U.N. Charter recognizes the importance of citizen in- terests in and support for the United Nations in the form of non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

More than 425 national, regional and international NGOs are associated with DPI. DPI I'encourages and actively assists1' these organizations. There is even an NGO section at DPI, headed by Sally Swing Sh elley, an American who proudly regards herself as a globalist bureaucrat. Her section assists various NGOs in organiz ing NGO committees on subjects ranging from human rights to disarmament. Many of these NGOs officially participate in U.N conferences, su ch as the U.N. Second Special Session on Disarma- ment (1982 and the Conference on Primary Health Care (1978) in Quoted in Juliana Geran Pilon MOSCOW'S U.N. Outpost Heritage Founda tion Backgrounder No. 307, November 22, 1983, p. io.

WGeneral Assembly, 37th Session, Fifth Committee, Item 111 (a) of the l9 Ibid Agenda, Personnel Questions the Secretary-General, A/C.5/37/L.2.30, August 19

82. Figures in this study include General Services Staff at DPI. U.N. Information Center in Washington showed that, in th e professional staff alone at DPI, Americans number 47 out of a total of 222 (21 percent Composition of the Secretariat, Report of Figures provided by the 11 Alma Ata in the Soviet Union. This provides an important and respectable forum to such anti-West groups as the International Organization of Consumers Unions and the World Peace Council.

One of the most serious deviations by DPI from its mandate has been its encouragement of NGOs to lobby the U.S. government. Not only is this not authorized by the U.N . Charter, it very likely violates U.S. law-since one-quarter of DPI's budget is provided by U.S. taxpayers, federal funds cannot be used to lobby. At a November 1983 DPI/NGO Orientation Course, NGOs were instructed through the use of llskitsll and formal presentations to lobby their national legislators, including U.S. Congressmen, on such issues as the U.N. Law of the Sea Treaty At a briefing for representatives of NGOs on December 15, 1983, Undersecretary-General Akashi confirmed that, due to budget- in g limitations, the General Assembly had recommended that DPI rely Itprimarily on the assistance of the mass media as well as governmental and non-governmental organizationsv1 in order to make its work 'Ifully understood by the peoples of the world.1121 Aka s hi also stressed that DPI, which had always had a very high esteem of NGOsI support, now felt a need for a more active coope ration with NGOs, llparticularly as they can influence the decision- making process at the national level.I1 While Akashi himself has been careful not'to advise NGOs to lobby the U.S. Congress, members of his staff openly promote and encourage active lobbying..

Extensive Soviet influence within many of DPIIs NGOs and the publication and distribution of anti-Western, specifically anti - U.S., anti-Israeli and anti-free enterprise propaganda through these organizations also should be of concern to the U.S. Congress. At present, several Soviet front groups routinely llsponsorl' NGO conferences in cooperation with such U.N. units as the C e nter Against Apartheid. Their proceedings subsequently are adopted by the U.N. and widely distributed by DPI. Because NGOs obtain and redistkibute DPI materials, their impact is many times greater than the official publication data may indicate ties and r e lations with its non-governmental organizations. In the near term, the Congress, at a minimum, should request that the State Department review the DPI-NGO relationship within the context of the comprehensive review of U.S. participation in the U.N called f or in the State Department Authorization Act for FY The Congress should request an investigation of DPIIs activi 1984-1985, P.L. 98-164.23 21 U.N. Department of Public Information, Non-Governmental Organizations Section, DPI/NGO/SB/83/33 The Work of the U n ited Nations: Department of Public Information January 6, 1984 See: Juliana Geran Pilon P.L. 98-164: The U.N. Under Scrutiny 22 Ibid. 23 Heritage Foundation Issue Bulletin No. 101, January 17, 1984. 12 HOW DPI SHAPES AND REPORTS THE NEWS One of the danger s posed by the United Nations is its role in affecting the way in which nations and their citizens view critical global issues. World reality is distorted by DPI when it gives the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO Southwest .African People's Organizat i on (SWAPO), and a handful of other favored groups flattering treatment. is the silence with which DPI treats human rights violations by socialist and communist nations in pro-Western countries warrant unrelenting U.N. attention and denunciation Equally di s torting reality Minor or even alleged misdeeds If DPI were to perpetuate the double standard only within the United Nations system, the dangerous effects of the Depart- ment's media campaign might be relatively minor news stories, press releases, and tape d radio broadcasts to the public media throughout the world. As such, DPI multiplies the impact of the U.N.'s "Hall of Mirrorsll distortions But DPI provides In offices in New York, Geneva and Vienna, DPI releases scores of press releases and news items ea c h day. During the third quarter of 1983, for example, DPI Ilcoverage activities1' at the New York Headquarters consisted of over 3,000 press releases, and 4,223 information cables.24 There were 1,352 information cables issued from the two conferences whic h took place during this quarter--the Second World'Conference to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination and the International Conference on the Question of Palestine. While the U.S. paid 25 percent of the costs for DPI coverage of both these conferences, t he U.S. did not participate in either conference In an interview with The Heritage Foundation, Gilbert0 Rizzo, Director of DPI's Press and Publications Division, pointed out that while approximately 250 to 300 newspapers are accredited with the United Nat i ons' DPI, the greatest distribution'of news and information from the U.N. is made by the major international news agencies-United Press International, the Associated Press Reuters, Agence-France Presse, TASS, and the News Agency of the People's Republic o f China. In addition, all the major television and radio networks, as well America's National Public Radio, have representatives accredited with DPI and who pick up the U.N daily press briefings for wider dissemination.

Example nuclear physicist Roger Eato n maintained that a Soviet nuclear DPI is curiously selective in its coverage of U.N. activities. in a 1983 debate in the Outer Space Committee, Canadian 24 "Monitoring System for DPI Programme Implementation," United Nations Department of Public Informat i on Memorandum from F. Lwanyantika Plasha Chief, Planning Programming and Evaluation Unit, to Yasushi Akashi Chart I 13 powered communication satellite had fallen from Canadian territory, and had not, as the Soviets its orbit onto were insistins burned up o ver the ocean. At a time when journalists throughout the world were covering this issue, DPI ignored the debate and did not release a statement by the Canadian scientist queried by the reporter concerning the omission, Undersecretary- General Akashi maint a ined that the issue llwould not warrant wide enough interest If When DPI reaches millions throughout the world in other ways In the third quarter of 1983, for example, U.N. Information Centers distributed and screened 3,351 films to a total audience of 72 , 651,974 in developing and developed countries.25 In the same quarter, the Centers distributed and showed 705 films on the subject of disarmament to a total audience of 12,388,983; 200 films on the subject of apartheid to a total audience of 11,543,433; 12 3 films on Namibia to a total audience of 10,878,53.7; and 395 films, highlighting the importance of the New International Economic Order in Development, to a total audience of 14,449,058.26 Some of these films treat their subjects in a balanced and relati v ely unbiased manner and deal with subjects worthy of attention. Most of the films, documents, video and radio tapes that are distributed and most of the briefings that are given, however, obscure or ignore significant issues and problems facing developing countries. Material on economic development, for example, does not address the real challenges to creating wealth and prosperity in the developing world and ignores the economical- ly most successful of the developing countries; material on disarmament ig nores Soviet aggression in Afghanistan and the enormous threat that conventional armaments pose to regional peace.

U.N., and in particular to promote the theory of global redistribu tion economics in the guise of the New International Economic Order. newsp apers for supplements on the NIEO and the U.N.'s view on development. Such activity appears to have been halted under Akashi Two years ago, DPI attempted to promote news coverage of the Subsidies of at least $432,000 were given to 15 foreign DPI has also b egun to target the U.S. Congress "to influence the decision-making process at the national level.Il In addition to encouraging lobbying, DPI has communicated with Congress directly on a wide range of subjects. A recent letter from the U.N. Washington Info r mation Center to key members of Congress contradicted, by using irrelevant data, the claims of key U.S. officials that the U.S. regularly is outvoted at the U.N.27 Example 25 Ibid. 26 27 Ibid Monitoring System op. cit Chart VI 14 Though DPI's priorities a n d public information activities to a large extent are mandated by the General Assembly and its committees, this does not explain DPI's double standard or its continued assault on the free enterprise system and multinational corporations. The General Assem b ly has not, for example, passed a resolution barring DPI from discussing the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in its publications or media broadcasts but DPI operates as though there were such a resolution control by the Soviet Union of the various media wi t hin DPI, and as one former Secretariat official described it, effective Soviet intimidation of key staff positions within the Department precludes the need for such a resolution and radio broadcasts. Examples Effective DPI's distortions appear throughout i ts documents, pamphlets Colonialism and South Africa In a 1983 radio broadcast on IICooperation Between the United Nations and the OAU (Organization of African Unity),Il the DPI narrator presented the taped view of a Soviet spokesman We fully support the c omplete elimination of the remnants of colonialism and racism. The Soviet Union is profound- ly opposed to Africa's becoming an arena of political confrontation. We support the desire of the African people that their continent be spared the presence of fo r eign military bases and be turned into a nuclear- weapons-free zone.28 While saying nothing of the Soviet, Cuban and East German military bases in sub-Saharan Africa, the narrator followed the Soviet's remarks with a comment on the U.S. relationship with t he OAU Although the United States still opposes U.N. assistance to liberation movements recognized by the OAU, it feels that cooperation between the two international organizations is necessary.29 By this commentary, the listener is told that because the U .S neither recognizes nor negotiates with the Southwest Africa .Peoples' Organization (SWAPO a major terrorist group, the U.S does not support the Ilcomplete elimination of the remnants of colonialism and racism in southern Africa. Of course, for many yea r s, the United States has voiced its opposition to colonialism and racism, including Soviet and Soviet backed neo-colonialism in Afghanistan and Southeast Asia. But DPI, in radio broadcasts and documents, continues to depict the U.S. as one of the main stu m bl- ing blocks to the end of colonialism 28 United Nations Radio Service, PERSPECTIVE EIGHTY-THREE, No. 21, May 25 1982 29 Ibid. 15 i There were so many complaints about imbalance in 'the DPI's United Nations Today-l982.(Suqqestions for Speakers) that a U . N. Secretariat spokesman indicated that Undersecretary-General Akashi had Ilconveyed his dissatisfaction at the lack of balance in some of the contents1I and had ordered it to be rewritten. Yet it was not revised and some 60,000 copies in English, plus th o se in French and Spanish were distributed by the United Nations' 64 Information Centers. Several diplomats at the U.N. have suggested that Soviet control of the DPI's External Relations Division had ensured publication despite Akashi's objections the cont i nued problems of achieving Namibia's independence are fully justified, and the U.S. Mission to the U.N. works extensive ly with U.N. organs to bring Namibia independence and to end racial discrimination in South Africa. But there would be no way of knowin g this from DPI's products. Through its unbalanced approach, DPI has not helped the efforts of the United States and other countries at the U.N. to resolve these issues Criticism of the apartheid policies in South Africa and of I The Middle East Nothing ch a racterizes DPI's coverage of the Middle East issue so much as its campaign against Israel. issue of U.N. Chronicle, an official DPI publication, for example, reported on Israel's operation in Lebanon. The Israeli forces are depicted in shrill pejorative t e rms, whereas action by the Palestine Liberation Organization was reported in studiously neutral terms. Examples: in covering the U.N. debate on the Israeli operation, DPI states A number of speakers compared Israeli actions in Lebanon-where it was accused of carrying out a 'genocide' of Palestinian and Lebanese people--with the crimes of Nazi Germany.1130 A picture of Damur, Lebanon, is captioned The town had 16,000 people in early June. ten people remained in its ruins.Il The truth was that the town had b een destroyed in 1976, when the PLO killed hundreds of its Christian inhabitant This llerror,ll which was never corrected, was distributed worldwide in an official DPI publication.

DPI has prepared or displayed poster and photogra phic exhibi- tions which have implied strongly that Israel alone has been responsible for the plight of the Palestinian people exhibit, shown at the U.N. in New York, was so starkly anti- Israeli that it was removed by the Secretariat within hours of its i nstallation at the request of Israeli Ambassador Yehuda Blum. Yet an official of the DPI admits that this and other exhibits continue to be distributed to U.N. Information Centers around the world The October.1982 A month later only One 1983 30 United Nat ions Chronicle, October 1982, p. 18 31 See Juliana Geran Pilon The United Nations' Campaign Against Israel,"

Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 271, June 16, 1983, p. 9. 16 In his interviews with The.Heritage Foundation, Akashi declined to comment whethe r the U.N. treats Israel unfairly. He did, however, admit that he sometimes has sleepless nights over the exhibits presented by the U.N. in celebration of Palestinian Solidarity Day. Asked what he would do differently, Akashi replied: This is also the imp ression of some diplomats who have indicated that Akashi may be manipulated by members of his staff sympathetic' to the PLO against Israel lYoulll be very surprised how little power I have."

Problems of Economic Development In dealing with the world econom y, DPI has a strong bias against free market solutions and in favor of the model offered by the centrally planned economies of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. This is demonstrated in DPIIs enthusiastic support and promotion of the U.N.Is New Internat ional Economic Order (NIEO).

DPI also endorses the U.N. argument that the problems of the world economy have been exacerbated by multinational corporations. In a 1982 issue of the DP1fl.N. University publication, Develo ment Forum, the Department printed a n article which maintaine among other claims, that !!the unprecedented TNC (transnational corporation) penetration of the world economy has become a leading catalyst in the global crisis of mounting unemployment, inflation and stagnation.'I DPI ignores th e overwhelming evidence that the private sector, particularly the multinational corporations has provided developing countries greater access to world markets, and develo ed new job opportunities in the countries where they invested. 3 Other arguments are p resented in favor of the NIEO, and against the free,enterprise system and the multinationals in a recently published DPI document, World Concerns and the United Nations. This document is to provide teaching units for primary andondary schools and for teac h er education. It presents a. heavily biased teaching unit for Grades 10-12 (ages 15-18) on IfDeveloping the World We Want: A Model U.N. Meeting on the New International Economic Order (NIEO which calls for an end to the llvicious cyclelf of staggering pri c e increases and dropping output in the developing world, and the implementation of "addi- tional financial flowsi1 and Itan entirely new range of international economic ground rules.1134 This document's pro-NIEO rationale 32 33 "The Ever-Grasping Drive De velopment Forum, November 1982, p 3. Address by Paul Belford, Director, International Issues Analysis, Inter national Division, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, to a Workshop on "Third World Development, U.N. Economic Agencies and U.S. Business,"

International Chamber of Commerce.

U.N. Department of Public Information, World Concerns and the United Nations Model Teaching Units for Primary, Secondary and Teacher Education New York, 1983, p. 1

46. This document is based on the work of participants in the U.N. Fellowship Program for Educators (1975-1981) and the UNESCO Associated Schools Project 34 17 ignores the development successes achieved by such countries as Taiwan,,Malaysia, Singapore and the Ivory Coast which have avoided adopting the disast rous economic policies of the centrally planned economies of the Soviet Union and other states within the Communist bloc.

Peacekeeping In the document Images and Reality, the DPI poses questions and attempts to provide answers on the "management, finance and peoplei1 of the U.N. system.

In answer to the question What are Peacekeeping operations and how effective have they been DPI provides the reply The peace-keeping activities of the United Nations have certainly been effective in preventing the renewal o f hostilities and in containing conflict situations in a number of sensitive areas of the DPI fails to explain, however, how it measures U.N. effective- ness, for the U.N. has not been able to effectively keep the peace in a world which has seen 140 confl i cts since 1945 in which approximately 10 million people have died. No mention is made, moreover, of the lack of discipline and effectiveness in many national contingents of U.N. peacekeeping operations where U.N. troops were found to have assisted various terrorist elements, particularly the Palestine Liberation Organization in Lebanon and the Golan Heights.

CONCLUSION The Department of Public Information has become more than .just an agency promoting "an informal understanding of the work and purposes of the U.N. among the peoples of the wor1d.I' become a source of propaganda to further the U.N.'s anti-Western and anti-free enterprise ideology double standard which gives favored treatment to the PLO, SWAP0 and a handful of other groups, while overlooking o utrages committed by socialist and communist nations. resources and undermine the credibility of the United Nations but also seems to provide a U.N. sanction, by its silence, for some of the world's worst contemporary violations of political and human rig hts.

DPI further has borne the double standard and spread its biases beyond the walls of the Secretariat building by openly It has The DPI also has become a powerful articulator of the U.N.'s Not only does this waste DPI 35 U.N. Department of Public Inform ation, Image and Reality, New York October 1983. 18 buying influence and publicity in the,world media, by carrying out an advocacy campaign for the U.N. through the 64 U.N. Informa tion Centers, and by directing non-governmental organizations associated w ith the Department to lobby before the U.S. Congress.

Last, the DPI has assumed a role as "defender of the faith while striving to protect the U.N. from all criticism, castigat- ing those who would criticize the U.N. organization for whatever reason, and d efending the U.S. role in that organization by presenting inaccurate and misleading .data on the U.S. voting record at the U.N While the DPI's activities are circumscribed by the priorities of the General Assembly, the DPI, and particularly Undersecretary - General Akashi still can recommend some programs and advise strongly against others. some programs cannot be carried out because of budgetary con straints, or because they are unbalanced and unfair, or because they will alienate those who are asked to pa y for them. Some U.N. diplomats maintain in private that Akashi has tried to do this in consultation with the Assembly and its various committees, for example, the Committee on the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. They regard Akashi as a man o f high integrity who personally must be very displeased by much of what DPI does. Yet he ultimately must bear responsibility for DPIIs record He may inform the General Assembly that If Akashi is intent on making the Department of Public Information an agen cy which does not merely publicize and promote the U.N.'s double standard, he must stand up to those who use his organization for such promotion and for the furthering of anti- Western ideas and values.

The U.S. already has begun a fundamental reappraisal of its role within the U.N. and the review has had results. President Ronald Reagan, for example, has notified UNESCO that the U.S intends to withdraw from participation in that body on December 31, 1984 The U.S. also is reconsidering its participation in the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD an agency based in Rome that fails to meet its goal of assisting small farmers in the poorest countries. Beyond this, however Washington must review U.S. support for the informational activi- ties o f the U.N. Secretariat, and particularly for the DPI In the State Department Authorization Act for FY 1984-1985 P.L. 98-164, Congress has asked the Executive Branch to conduct an immediate review of U.S. participation in the U.N and to make recommendation s based on the review. The report, which is due to Congress by June 30, 1984, should'evaluate the role of DPI in the U.N and how that role affects the ffimportance of the U.N. in fulfilling the policies and objectives-of the United States 36 U.S Congress, S tate Department Authorization Act for FY 1984-1985, P.L 98-164. 19 Before this report is completed, the Congress should demand that the U.N. cease all promotion of lobbying activities before Congress, and all support'for non-governmental organizations whi ch participate in such activities. Congress should stop all U.S. funding of DPI activities that promote the interests of the Palestine Liberation Organization, SWAP0 and other terrorist groups.

The U.S. should also seek the-suppor t of other states within the U.N. to change the rules by which the DPI distributes its publications. and press releases, particularly to the U.N. Informa- tion Centers and the non-governmental organizations. The U.S. should seek to ensure that, if DPI dis t ributes material based on a General Assembly resolution requesting that information on a particular topic be "made available,Il it does so only for those resolutions that are either adopted without a vote or on.the basis of consensus--that is, resolutions that reflect the views of all member states of the U.N. Since around one-third of all General Assembly resolutions are adopted without a vote, this would give DPI the opportunity to distribute information that truly reflects the views. of all member state s of the U.N. and to avoid publicizing information on issues that were voted on by the General Assembly only after heated debate, and not approved by all member states.

If the DPI is not willing to end these activities; to offer a more balanced and unbiase d interpretation of policies and events; and to demonstrate an ability to order priorities and accurately measure program effectiveness, the U.S. Congress should vote to withhold a portion of its annual contribution to the U.N. Secretariat in an amount co mmensurate with the U.S. portion of the DPI annual budget.

Roger A. Brooks Roe Fellow in United Nations Studies United Nations Assessment Project

About the Author