• Heritage Action
  • More

December 7, 2009

The War in Afghanistan: Costs in Context

The Real Costs

  • A Small Price to Pay: The war in Afghanistan cost $51 billion in 2009. The Administration has requested $65 billion in war funding for fiscal year 2010. The deployment of 30,000 additional troops will add approximately $30 billion in new costs, bringing total spending on the war in 2010 to approximately $95 billion.
  • War a Tiny Fraction of Federal Spending: The $51 billion cost of the war in 2009 is just 1.4% of the $3.5 trillion spent by Washington that year and 2.8% of the $1.4 trillion budget deficit. Even though overall defense spending has grown 81% in real terms since 9/11, it is still responsible for less than 19% of all new spending over that period.
  • Small Relative to America's Past Wars: Paying for World War II cost nearly half of the nation's economy or gross domestic product (GDP). Fighting the Korean War consumed about 14% of GDP, and the Vietnam War cost about 9%. By contrast, the portion of the defense budget that funds wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is just 1% of GDP in 2009.

<TaxonomyNode id='{B0ED56D4-C366-4054-A3D4-701B73FC8118}'>Afghanistan</TaxonomyNode> War Not a Budget-BusterThe Funding for a Vital National Interest in Context

  • Far Less Than TARP, Bailouts, and the Stimulus: The $210 billion lifetime cost of the war from 2001 to 2009 is just one-third of the $787 billion stimulus, or a fifth of the $1.2 trillion price tag for the first 10 years of the House health reform bill. The $241 billion net cost of TARP and the $389 billion bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac both exceed spending on the Afghanistan war to date.
  • Smaller Than the Annual Growth in Entitlements: The entire cost of military operations in Afghanistan in 2009 was less than the increase in Social Security spending, which grew by $66 billion over the course of the year from $617 billion in 2008 to $683 billion in 2009. Medicare, Medicaid, and other entitlements are also growing faster than tax revenues at an unsustainable rate of around 8% per year.
  • One Year of Welfare Under Obama Eclipses Seven-Year Cost of Iraq War: According to the Congressional Research Service, the cost of the Iraq war through the end of the Bush Administration was around $622 billion. By contrast, annual federal and state means-tested welfare spending will reach $888 billion in FY 2010. Federal welfare spending alone will equal $697 billion in that year.

Affordable Choices

  • Cut Domestic Programs to Pay for National Security: The federal government is projected to spend almost $3.8 trillion in 2010. Between Medicare fraud, government subsidies and bailouts, Cash for Clunkers, and so on, Congress should be able to cut spending by 2.6%. Not only would it then offset the costs of the war, but it would be a serious gesture of fiscal responsibility.

For more information, please visit: www.heritage.org.

Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.

The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.

More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.

Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."

Sign up to start your free subscription today!