November 26, 2012
By Hans A. von Spakovsky
The proposal that the federal government set new "minimum" standards for state voter registration systems is a bad idea. This is being pushed by so-called election reform and civil rights organizations as another step toward the federal takeover of the administration of elections.
Even ignoring the possible constitutional problems with such a pre-emption of state authority, it's a fantasy to imagine that federal bureaucrats would come up with better standards that would administer elections more effectively or efficiently.
After all, one of the reasons that state voter registration rolls are in such poor shape today — with large numbers of voters who are dead, have moved, or are non-citizens — is because of the restrictive standards imposed by the federal government in 1993 by the National Voter Registration Act.
That law made it very difficult to remove ineligible voters. Local jurisdictions were sued so often by the Justice Department when they tried to remove ineligible voters, many stopped trying to clean up their lists at all.
That is why there are many places around the country where the number of registered voters is greater than the Census says there are individuals of voting age.
The situation would only get worse if federal bureaucrats with no election administration experience in Washington were given the authority to set more standards for voter registration systems. Even if it there weren't constitutional problems, there is reason to fear that the federal government would make a terrible mess of it.
Many of the groups pushing this idea have a disproportionate influence on federal policy and a history of partisanship and opposition to common sense reforms such as voter ID. This is a recipe for incompetence and manipulation. Decentralization was designed to preserve our freedom and accountability. We should fight to keep it.
There are improvements that states can make in the administration of elections, and many are pursuing them. But a one-size-fits-all regulatory regime, run by Washington bureaucrats appointed by the president, won't work. The citizens of the 50 states, through their duly elected representatives, must keep control of the process.
Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation and a former member of the Federal Election Commission. He is the co-author of Who's Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk.
First appeared in USA Today.
Hans A. von Spakovsky
Manager, Election Law Reform Initiative and Senior Legal Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 200,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973