November 25, 2012
By James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
They called it the Solarium Project.
Shortly after winning the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower met with his secretary of state in the Solarium room of the White House to set up a sweeping strategic review of American foreign policy.
Teams of "experts" from the administration and the national security community laid out three disparate options for dealing with Moscow and avoiding World War III. Ike settled on a course of containment. It became the foundation for U.S. strategy throughout the Cold War.
The Solarium Project is often cited as sine qua non of strategic planning. And as Evan Thomas reveals in his new book, "Ike's Bluff," there is more to the story. A first-class strategist, Eisenhower hardly needed a staff study to scope out the right solution for surviving the showdown the Soviet Union. Rather, the president used the Solarium review to help lead Washington to where Ike knew they needed to go. Eisenhower was guiding the bureaucracy to a reasonable place -- convincing them that they were persuading him.
Shortly after the elections, the Obama White House signaled that it, too, may be embarking on a broad strategic review -- fine-tuning the president's policies for the second term. Good for them. A review is certainly in order.
It is difficult for the administration to argue honestly that foreign relations -- on almost any front -- are better than they were four years ago. All the president's "signature accomplishments -- the drawdown in Iraq; winding down in Afghanistan; toppling Gadhafi; bagging Bin Laden -- have delivered no real strategic dividends. On top of that, the president plans to engage the world with a much smaller military, a less forceful foreign policy and greater reliance on the cooperation of other states and international organizations and institutions. That seems an awfully "small ball" approach while America's fortunes wane on so many national security fronts.
If there is a review, it will likely be undertaken and implemented by a completely new national security team. By this summer, the White House phone book could have new names listed under the secretaries of defense, homeland security, and state, the national security advisor and the head of the CIA.
Who fills these posts really matters. If the White House elects to select cheerleaders who will just rubber stamp the Obama Doctrine, the White House will likely just double down on failure. Obama, like Eisenhower, may already know what he wants. But world events have already shown that what Mr. Obama wants isn't working so well.
On the other hand, if the commander in chief really wants as honest assessment of what is going on the world, he will have to pick some top people who are not afraid to give him an honest grade.
The Senate has an important role to play in this process. Question one in any confirmation hearing must determine whether the president has selected men and women who will deliver advice with wisdom, candor and a critical eye. Of course, they need to be loyal to their commander in chief and willing to follow orders. But before the president makes any critical security decision, he deserves and needs more than yes-man groupthink from his top advisers.
There is certainly no shortage of issues that ought to come up in the strategic review and Senate confirmation hearings. For starters: How will the United States deal with the dual challenge of the rise of political Islam and a resurgent global Islamist insurgency? How can the U.S. pivot to Asia without ignoring the wars likely to come in the Middle East?
We know the president can win elections. Now, we'll get to see how wisely he can lead and serve.
Examiner Columnist James Jay Carafano is a senior research fellow for national security at the Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in The Examiner.
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
Vice President for the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, and the E. W. Richardson Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973