February 12, 2012
By James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
Anwar Sadat had a plan. He would "challenge the Israeli Security Theory by carrying out military action ... aimed at inflicting the heaviest losses on the enemy ...." On October 6, 1973, a coalition of Arab armies led by Egypt and Syria attacked.
The Israelis defeated the invasion ... decisively. But the 1973 war left the region unsettled, a dangerous hot spot. Henry Kissinger summarized the aftermath this way: "A stalemate in the Middle East marked by American incompetence .... Washington's influence with Arab countries has dissipated ... Egypt and Syria, in particular, became client states of the Soviet Union. The situation did not serve U.S. interests, nor ultimately those of Israel or the cause of peace in the region."
History may be about to repeat itself. The confluence of inept U.S. Middle East policy, the Arab Spring, the rise of Iran, and the consolidation of Hamas' influence set the stage for another Arab attack on Israel.
Upon entering the Oval Office, President Obama identified three pillars of his Middle East strategy: brokering peace between Israel and Palestine; engaging with Syria and Iran, and withdrawing from Iraq. None of these initiatives has turned out well.
The prospects for a brokered peace are much diminished. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas recently moved to reconcile with Hamas, a U.S.-designated terrorist organization. After hearing the news, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared, "Its either peace with Hamas or peace with Israel. You can't have both."
Engagement with Damascus and Tehran hasn't worked out either. The administration is now openly calling for Syrian President Bashar Assad to step down and seeking new economic sanctions on Iran. Clearly, three years of attempting to "engage" these odious regimes has produced nothing but failure.
Only in pulling out of Iraq has the White House achieved its policy objectives. That looks to be cold comfort. American forces had dampened violence there, deterring aggression among Iraqi factions and combating outside terrorists. The withdrawal of U.S. forces produced an almost immediate resurgence of violence and instability.
These policy shortfalls have been complicated by the Arab Spring. It is very possible that, when the final shock waves settle, most of the governments arising from those protests will not be strong friends of the United States, much less Israel.
Meanwhile, Iran is doing everything possible to whip-up anti-Israeli sentiment in the region. Recently, Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared, "From now onward, we will support and help any nations, any groups fighting against the Zionist regime across the world, and we are not afraid of declaring this."
With Hamas firmly entrenched in Palestine, it is not hard to envision a scary future: Hamas engineers a military confrontation with Israel, then calls on like-minded Arab nations to ride to the rescue. A nuclear-armed Iran serves as a checkmate to Israel's nuclear deterrent. A bloody conventional war follows.
The United States needs a clear strategy to counter this nightmare scenario. A regional war that could well spill out of control is not in America's interest or anyone else's. The right strategy may start with three key countries -- Israel, Turkey, and Iraq.
These nations have every reason to work together to counter Iranian influence and promote economic growth and stability in their part of the world. The U.S. ought to be doing everything possible to build bridges between them.
Likewise, the U.S. has to have the capacity to act in the region. Selling military hardware to potential adversaries of Iran is not enough. Without a U.S. presence to back it up, those transactions are just an arms race.
Arms sales, plus a continued robust American military presence -- working closely with NATO and Gulf Cooperation Council allies -- equals deterrence.
James Jay Carafano is a senior research fellow for national security at the Heritage Foundation.
First appeared in The Examiner
James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.
Vice President for the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, and the E. W. Richardson Fellow
Read More >>
Request an interview >>
Please complete the following form to request an interview with a Heritage expert.
Please note that all fields must be completed.
Heritage's daily Morning Bell e-mail keeps you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.
The subscription is free and delivers you the latest conservative policy perspectives on the news each weekday--straight from Heritage experts.
The Morning Bell is your daily wake-up call offering a fresh, conservative analysis of the news.
More than 450,000 Americans rely on Heritage's Morning Bell to stay up to date on the policy battles that affect them.
Rush Limbaugh says "The Heritage Foundation's Morning Bell is just terrific!"
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) says it's "a great way to start the day for any conservative who wants to get America back on track."
Sign up to start your free subscription today!
The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute,
with hundreds of thousands of individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in
February 1973, has a staff of 275 and an annual expense budget of $82.4 million.
Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free
enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national
defense. Read More
© 2014, The Heritage Foundation Conservative policy research since 1973